<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK&#8217;s Lincs JV Secures $662mm Project Financing for 270-MW Offshore Wind Farm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/07/uks-lincs-jv-secures-662mm-project-financing-for-270-mw-offshore-wind-farm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/07/uks-lincs-jv-secures-662mm-project-financing-for-270-mw-offshore-wind-farm/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/07/uks-lincs-jv-secures-662mm-project-financing-for-270-mw-offshore-wind-farm/#comment-123546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38872#comment-123546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I&#039;ve been reading onshore capacity is now in the 40% to 50% capacity range.  I&#039;d expect offshore to be at least that good, if not better.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve been reading onshore capacity is now in the 40% to 50% capacity range.  I&#8217;d expect offshore to be at least that good, if not better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brak</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/07/uks-lincs-jv-secures-662mm-project-financing-for-270-mw-offshore-wind-farm/#comment-123545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38872#comment-123545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is $662.15 million the total cost for the project?  If so, it&#039;s very cheap, about $2,450 per kilowatt.  Assumming the turbines operate at 33% of capacity that&#039;s under $7,400 per average kilowatt of output.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is $662.15 million the total cost for the project?  If so, it&#8217;s very cheap, about $2,450 per kilowatt.  Assumming the turbines operate at 33% of capacity that&#8217;s under $7,400 per average kilowatt of output.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
