<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coal Falls While Clean Tech Rises in Survey of Electric Utility Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/05/coal-falls-while-clean-tech-rises-in-survey-of-electric-utility-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/05/coal-falls-while-clean-tech-rises-in-survey-of-electric-utility-industry/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 03:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcacci Communications</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/05/coal-falls-while-clean-tech-rises-in-survey-of-electric-utility-industry/#comment-141745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcacci Communications]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38807#comment-141745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This analysis comes from the Union of Concerned Scientists’ “Ripe for Retirement” report, which found that 18% of all U.S. coal generation capacity would not compete with natural gas or wind energy generation after being upgraded with modern pollution controls. The findings mirror a recent survey of utility executives that found coal’s fiscal outlook plummeting. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This analysis comes from the Union of Concerned Scientists’ “Ripe for Retirement” report, which found that 18% of all U.S. coal generation capacity would not compete with natural gas or wind energy generation after being upgraded with modern pollution controls. The findings mirror a recent survey of utility executives that found coal’s fiscal outlook plummeting. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal down, cleantech up in electric utility survey &#124; Grist</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/05/coal-falls-while-clean-tech-rises-in-survey-of-electric-utility-industry/#comment-123312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coal down, cleantech up in electric utility survey &#124; Grist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38807#comment-123312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A version of this article originally appeared on CleanTechnica. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A version of this article originally appeared on CleanTechnica. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captivation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/05/coal-falls-while-clean-tech-rises-in-survey-of-electric-utility-industry/#comment-123229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captivation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38807#comment-123229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;coal may rise from the dead&quot;

If natural gas displaces coal, I picture coal plants being mothballed or closed completely.  If natural gas prices then go on to rise higher than coal, I imagine a lot of expense in recommissioning / rebuilding those coal plants.  Thus the re-invigoration of coal is hard for me to accept.  Granted, a coal plant can probably be brought online for just a fraction of the price of a nuclear plant, ... but considering all the regulatory hurdles I don&#039;t think it will happen easily. Its expensive to ramp down, and will be more expensive to ramp back up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;coal may rise from the dead&#8221;</p>
<p>If natural gas displaces coal, I picture coal plants being mothballed or closed completely.  If natural gas prices then go on to rise higher than coal, I imagine a lot of expense in recommissioning / rebuilding those coal plants.  Thus the re-invigoration of coal is hard for me to accept.  Granted, a coal plant can probably be brought online for just a fraction of the price of a nuclear plant, &#8230; but considering all the regulatory hurdles I don&#8217;t think it will happen easily. Its expensive to ramp down, and will be more expensive to ramp back up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
