CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power british flag

Published on May 25th, 2012 | by Zachary Shahan

5

HUGE Cut in 2020 UK Solar Target (Nearly 50% — from 22 GW to 11.9 GW)

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

May 25th, 2012 by Zachary Shahan
 
 

As many in the UK solar industry and elsewhere have claimed for months, the UK’s sharp and rapid cuts to its solar Feed-in Tariff (FiT) policy is projected to make it nearly impossible for the country to hit its 2020 solar target. In fact, amidst the positive news that the country is delaying its next round of solar FiT cuts and is making the whole program more predictable, it apparently tried to sneak through the fact that it has cut its 2020 solar forecast from 22 GW to 11.9 GW.

The change was included in the government’s impact assessment of the FiT cuts released yesterday (but, for some reason, was not trumpeted in the news release).

“The figures are significantly lower than those the government released when it launched the subsidy review in February, which forecast capacity would hit 22GW by 2020, with 3.3 million installations,” Business Green reports. Here’s more:

The February review based its ambitious predictions on a report by consultancy Parsons Brinkerhoff (PB), which said capital expenditure costs for new installations were likely to fall 10-30 per cent by the end of 2012, with further falls of 5-25 per cent in 2013-14, and smaller on-going reductions in 2015 and beyond.

At that time, solar insiders raised doubts about some of PB’s conclusions, including the rate at which capital costs would fall over the coming year. They also expressed concern that the report was rushed out over a few days in January, and as such offered only a snapshot of the industry.

The government’s new impact assessment (IA) now confirms the initial PB report had overestimated the rate at which costs will fall, leading to a lower central deployment forecast.

“At 11.9GW the central 2020 deployment projection is considerably less than the central estimate in the draft February [impact assessment] at 22GW,” the impact assessment states. “This is largely because PB’s estimate for the cost of large-scale PV installations is significantly higher than in their February report, and PB projects much slower reductions in installation costs from 2014 onwards than previously estimated.

“Furthermore, it is assumed that investor hurdle rates are higher than before, leading to less uptake at a given tariff.”

Figures from the solar industry reacted angrily to the news, accusing the government of attempting to conceal its downgraded forecast for industry growth.

This news again hurts many people’s confidence in the UK government’s honesty and predictability when it comes to solar as well as other industries.

However, solar industry leaders noted that they were still happy about yesterday’s announcement and the increased predictability that came with it.

Additionally, Paul Barwell of the Solar Trade Association noted that the cuts are coming not because of solar industry failures but because of their great successes in reducing the costs of solar.

“It is vital consumers understand tariffs can come down because the costs of solar have come down – there is a faulty perception out there that cuts mean solar doesn’t pay. In fact, solar offers similar returns today as when the FIT scheme began because the industry has been so successful at reducing technology and installation costs,” Barwell said.

Image: British flag via Shutterstock

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

is the director of CleanTechnica, the most popular cleantech-focused website in the world, and Planetsave, a world-leading green and science news site. He has been covering green news of various sorts since 2008, and he has been especially focused on solar energy, electric vehicles, and wind energy since 2009. Aside from his work on CleanTechnica and Planetsave, he's the founder and director of Solar Love, EV Obsession, and Bikocity. To connect with Zach on some of your favorite social networks, go to ZacharyShahan.com and click on the relevant buttons.



  • Hope

    I think I may start writing some letters. Because this has kind of pissed me off.

    Small upside is local government (councils) started installing PV on the roofs of social housing,wo hopefully council initiatives will bypass coalition attempts to piss off every demographic in the UK.

    • Bob_Wallace

      What’s going on in the UK? Have pro-nuclear interests taken over the government?

      Between wind, solar, tidal and the ability to share power with Iceland and Europe there’s no need for wasting money on glow in the dark generation. No need to put people at risk and leave nasty problems for those who follow.

      • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Conservative government has taken over. At least, though, try to speak green, but not doing green in the background. (Think Chris Christie in NJ talking about how much his green program will do to help the environment when it’s actually a program he inherited and then watered down.)

  • wattleberry

    This, on top of the recent nuclear announcement, looks gloomy indeed, but the the UK does gloom well these days, probably to prevent the pound rising too high against other currencies and reducing its export competitiveness.
    Never mind the rock-bottom morale of the public.
    Plenty of time to boost renewables, but not to abandon radioactive commitments.

  • Captivation

    I was about to write that Adam Smith must be rolling over in his grave. But then I remembered that the father of economics was actually Scottish and Scotland has been quite aggressive in its pursuit of Clean Energy.
    Why Britain would choose to forgo the advantages of Clean Energy is one of those mysteries that will puzzle us in the future. Its sort of like the question of why conservatives hate to conserve anything. We can ask again and again but the only reply is silence.

Back to Top ↑