<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Renewables Jump 13 Percent in 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Solar energy, while still one of the smallest renewable generation sources at just 36 MWh in 2011, registered an incredible 153 percent increase from 2010’s 14 MWh.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Wrong units: 36 GW-h or 36,000 MW-h. That&#039;s an increase from an average of 1.6 to 4.2 MW. It&#039;s not really incredible to see a big percentage jump when going from &#039;insignificant&#039; to &#039;trivial&#039;. 

Texas&#039;s residential demand in 2010 was 137 TW-h, or about 5.3 MW-h per person. I don&#039;t have a figure for number of people per household. 
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/pdf/sep2010.pdf (p. 263)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Solar energy, while still one of the smallest renewable generation sources at just 36 MWh in 2011, registered an incredible 153 percent increase from 2010’s 14 MWh.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Wrong units: 36 GW-h or 36,000 MW-h. That&#8217;s an increase from an average of 1.6 to 4.2 MW. It&#8217;s not really incredible to see a big percentage jump when going from &#8216;insignificant&#8217; to &#8216;trivial&#8217;. </p>
<p>Texas&#8217;s residential demand in 2010 was 137 TW-h, or about 5.3 MW-h per person. I don&#8217;t have a figure for number of people per household.<br />
<a href="http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/pdf/sep2010.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/pdf/sep2010.pdf</a> (p. 263)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May be right? How about definitely right. There is absolutely no way that the average home in Texas consumes over a million Kwh per year. Let&#039;s just say that the average home consumes 25,000 kWh per year. Still too high. But if that was the case then 31.7 million Mwh would be enough for  1,268,000 homes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be right? How about definitely right. There is absolutely no way that the average home in Texas consumes over a million Kwh per year. Let&#8217;s just say that the average home consumes 25,000 kWh per year. Still too high. But if that was the case then 31.7 million Mwh would be enough for  1,268,000 homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silviomarcacci</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silviomarcacci]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all,

You may be right about the 31,000 figure - I&#039;m not sure. That number came from an NPR report found here: http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2012/05/16/renewables-still-on-the-rise-in-texas/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>You may be right about the 31,000 figure &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure. That number came from an NPR report found here: <a href="http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2012/05/16/renewables-still-on-the-rise-in-texas/" rel="nofollow">http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2012/05/16/renewables-still-on-the-rise-in-texas/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas has 10,400 MW nameplate of wind. So the 31 Million MWh figure sounds right but certainly not the 31,000 homes figure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas has 10,400 MW nameplate of wind. So the 31 Million MWh figure sounds right but certainly not the 31,000 homes figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/texas-renewables-jump-13-percent-in-2011/#comment-121293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38173#comment-121293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;31.7 million MWh sounds like a massive amount, but it only represents the annual power demand of 31,000 Texas homes&quot;

I know everything his bigger in Texas, but this can&#039;t be right... That&#039;s 1 million KWhr per home per year or an average draw of 114 KW 24/7 all year. I don&#039;t think the average Texas home runs the equivalent of over 1000 100W light bulbs continuously...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;31.7 million MWh sounds like a massive amount, but it only represents the annual power demand of 31,000 Texas homes&#8221;</p>
<p>I know everything his bigger in Texas, but this can&#8217;t be right&#8230; That&#8217;s 1 million KWhr per home per year or an average draw of 114 KW 24/7 all year. I don&#8217;t think the average Texas home runs the equivalent of over 1000 100W light bulbs continuously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
