<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hydrogen &#8212; Tomorrow&#8217;s Biofuel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/hydrogen-tomorrows-biofuel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/hydrogen-tomorrows-biofuel/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/hydrogen-tomorrows-biofuel/#comment-121345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38120#comment-121345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOOGLE:  Prop 87 (510) 537-1796

Bill Clinton, Al Gore &amp; Senator Obama supported the California 2006 Prop. 87, a GMO corn ethanol welfare program.

Bill, Al, have changed opinion on the ethanol mandate, I wonder if Obama will make this the time for CHANGE?

I support a waiver of the ethanol mandate, voluntary use of ethanol in my gas.

Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.

It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.

We do NOT support AB 523 or SB 1396 unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.

Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water &amp; air need better, it is time.

The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.

AB 523 &amp; SB 1326 are just a short put (waiver) from better results.

GOOGLE:  Prop 87 (510) 537-1796

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOGLE:  Prop 87 (510) 537-1796</p>
<p>Bill Clinton, Al Gore &amp; Senator Obama supported the California 2006 Prop. 87, a GMO corn ethanol welfare program.</p>
<p>Bill, Al, have changed opinion on the ethanol mandate, I wonder if Obama will make this the time for CHANGE?</p>
<p>I support a waiver of the ethanol mandate, voluntary use of ethanol in my gas.</p>
<p>Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.</p>
<p>It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.</p>
<p>We do NOT support AB 523 or SB 1396 unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.</p>
<p>Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water &amp; air need better, it is time.</p>
<p>The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.</p>
<p>AB 523 &amp; SB 1326 are just a short put (waiver) from better results.</p>
<p>GOOGLE:  Prop 87 (510) 537-1796</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Miles</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/hydrogen-tomorrows-biofuel/#comment-121261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Miles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38120#comment-121261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great article Joshua, thanks.

Previously when thinking of Brazils alt-fuel program I only thought of sugar cane ethanol.

I&#039;d just written a few posts on my own blog about promising Hydrogen Fuel Cell technologies- but one of the challenges I noticed that still remains is creating hydrogen inexpensively and sustainably.

Fuel Cell implementation-
 
http://work-bench.org/?p=1520

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article Joshua, thanks.</p>
<p>Previously when thinking of Brazils alt-fuel program I only thought of sugar cane ethanol.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d just written a few posts on my own blog about promising Hydrogen Fuel Cell technologies- but one of the challenges I noticed that still remains is creating hydrogen inexpensively and sustainably.</p>
<p>Fuel Cell implementation-</p>
<p><a href="http://work-bench.org/?p=1520" rel="nofollow">http://work-bench.org/?p=1520</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/17/hydrogen-tomorrows-biofuel/#comment-121245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38120#comment-121245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t the carbon in the bioethanol come from non-fossil fuel sources so it shouldn&#039;t add to CO2 ppm. Unless you&#039;re referring to a change of land use which reduces the amount of carbon locked up in plant matter. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the carbon in the bioethanol come from non-fossil fuel sources so it shouldn&#8217;t add to CO2 ppm. Unless you&#8217;re referring to a change of land use which reduces the amount of carbon locked up in plant matter. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
