<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Million Homes Can Be Powered by Mid-Atlantic Solar (Today)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[some slight edits made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some slight edits made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In D.C. and Virginia, oil burning is the main source of electricity, according to the EPA.&quot;

Not really.
&quot;The District of Columbia has two distillate fuel oil-fired power plants, Benning and Buzzard Point. Both plants are more than 35 years old, and for many years now have been used primarily as peaking plants, operating only a few hours per year during times of highest electricity demand.&quot;
http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-analysis.cfm?sid=DC

&quot;Coal-fired power plants typically account for nearly one-half of the State’s electricity generation. Two nuclear power plants account for about one-third of the State’s generation, and natural gas- and petroleum-fired power plants account for much of the rest.&quot;
http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-analysis.cfm?sid=VA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In D.C. and Virginia, oil burning is the main source of electricity, according to the EPA.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really.<br />
&#8220;The District of Columbia has two distillate fuel oil-fired power plants, Benning and Buzzard Point. Both plants are more than 35 years old, and for many years now have been used primarily as peaking plants, operating only a few hours per year during times of highest electricity demand.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-analysis.cfm?sid=DC" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-analysis.cfm?sid=DC</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Coal-fired power plants typically account for nearly one-half of the State’s electricity generation. Two nuclear power plants account for about one-third of the State’s generation, and natural gas- and petroleum-fired power plants account for much of the rest.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-analysis.cfm?sid=VA" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-analysis.cfm?sid=VA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what PJM, the source says, &quot;One gigawatt of
electricity generated would power between 800,000 and one million homes.&quot;
http://www.pjm.com/~/media/about-pjm/newsroom/2012-releases/20120515-pjm-region-shines-with-one-gw-solar-power.ashx

I am sure everyone knows sunlight is not available 24 hours a day. So when solar power is mentioned as powering a home, it is assumed there is not yet available widespread storage capacity for power at night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what PJM, the source says, &#8220;One gigawatt of<br />
electricity generated would power between 800,000 and one million homes.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.pjm.com/~/media/about-pjm/newsroom/2012-releases/20120515-pjm-region-shines-with-one-gw-solar-power.ashx" rel="nofollow">http://www.pjm.com/~/media/about-pjm/newsroom/2012-releases/20120515-pjm-region-shines-with-one-gw-solar-power.ashx</a></p>
<p>I am sure everyone knows sunlight is not available 24 hours a day. So when solar power is mentioned as powering a home, it is assumed there is not yet available widespread storage capacity for power at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your source is the first link then the source says &quot; when the sun is shining&quot;.

For ~4.5 hours per day there is enough electricity produced to power 800,000 to a million houses.

For the other ~19.5 hours there is no electricity produced.

That makes your title incorrect.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your source is the first link then the source says &#8221; when the sun is shining&#8221;.</p>
<p>For ~4.5 hours per day there is enough electricity produced to power 800,000 to a million houses.</p>
<p>For the other ~19.5 hours there is no electricity produced.</p>
<p>That makes your title incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob, the source says up to one million homes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, the source says up to one million homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the big plus side, assuming double in two years is correct, then that is 500MW added in two years. That is fast compared to building a coal plant and way faster than building a nuclear plant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the big plus side, assuming double in two years is correct, then that is 500MW added in two years. That is fast compared to building a coal plant and way faster than building a nuclear plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1

Let&#039;s not inflate figures to unrealistic values and stay with our feet on the ground. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not inflate figures to unrealistic values and stay with our feet on the ground. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/16/one-million-homes-can-be-powered-by-mid-atlantic-solar-today/#comment-121178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38127#comment-121178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jake, need to be careful with the &#039;one million homes&#039; claim.  

Here&#039;s what your linked source says - &quot;That&#039;s enough - when the sun is shining - to power 800,000 to 1 million homes.&quot;  And that&#039;s also not a great way to present things.

Let&#039;s assume an average 4.5 solar hour day for the area.  About a 19% capacity.  Or enough electricity to fully power 150,000 to 188,000 homes.

It&#039;s still an impressive number and failing to adjust for capacity allows scoffers to quickly dismiss the real accomplishment.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, need to be careful with the &#8216;one million homes&#8217; claim.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what your linked source says &#8211; &#8220;That&#8217;s enough &#8211; when the sun is shining &#8211; to power 800,000 to 1 million homes.&#8221;  And that&#8217;s also not a great way to present things.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume an average 4.5 solar hour day for the area.  About a 19% capacity.  Or enough electricity to fully power 150,000 to 188,000 homes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still an impressive number and failing to adjust for capacity allows scoffers to quickly dismiss the real accomplishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
