<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Support a Huge (102.5-MW) Wind Farm in Wisconsin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaineHiker</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/#comment-121642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MaineHiker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37879#comment-121642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[shame on you
Wind Industry Sponsored Online Blogging Alive, Well and Against the Law?
https://skydrive.live.com/?sc=photos&amp;cid=b6147304a619be64

Posted by Whetstone_Willy on May 20, 2012 at 10:00am 
Send Message   View Blog 
The next time you read some bald faced pro-wind lies in an online post, consider that the blogger may be employed by an organization that has made this commenting part of his or her job. The employer could be a wind company but also a wind industry law firm, engineering firm, a paid off so called environmental group, an ornithologist who rigs bird studies, etc.
It is now established fact that many of the pro-wind comments we see in online reader comments are the result of paid bloggers or bloggers otherwise employed by the wind industry or their mercenaries in the paid off environmental organizations.
The following directives are taken from the Board of Directors of the American Wind Energy Association 11/2/11 meeting materials.
&quot;Respond quickly to unfavorable articles by posting comments online, using the AWEA blog and twitter, and putting out press releases&quot;.
&quot; • Work with Grassroots team to recruit and activate a “Wind Army,” identifying state,    member and third-party surrogates to spread AWEA messages. Results: • Quadrupled size of online community from February to October, building online advocacy list from 25,000 to 113,000; plus LinkedIn at 8,000, Twitter at 12,500,     Facebook at 37,000, for a total online community of more than 172,000 and still     rapidly growing&quot;.
The PDF can be seen here:
http://www.coalitionforsensiblesiting.com/doc/AWEAPolicyDoc-Nov2011...
I believe that this sort of paid blogging without disclosure may be illegal. Please see the red colored font below:
For Release: 10/05/2009
FTC Publishes Final Guides Governing Endorsements, Testimonials
Changes Affect Testimonial Advertisements, Bloggers, Celebrity Endorsements
The Federal Trade Commission today announced that it has approved final revisions to the guidance it gives to advertisers on how to keep their endorsement and testimonial ads in line with the FTC Act.
The notice incorporates several changes to the FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, which address endorsements by consumers, experts, organizations, and celebrities, as well as the disclosure of important connections between advertisers and endorsers. The Guides were last updated in 1980.
Thank you, Whetstone Willy
Under the revised Guides, advertisements that feature a consumer and convey his or her experience with a product or service as typical when that is not the case will be required to clearly disclose the results that consumers can generally expect. In contrast to the 1980 version of the Guides – which allowed advertisers to describe unusual results in a testimonial as long as they included a disclaimer such as “results not typical” – the revised Guides no longer contain this safe harbor.
The revised Guides also add new examples to illustrate the long standing principle that “material connections” (sometimes payments or free products) between advertisers and endorsers – connections that consumers would not expect – must be disclosed. These examples address what constitutes an endorsement when the message is conveyed by bloggers or other “word-of-mouth” marketers. The revised Guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service. Likewise, if a company refers in an advertisement to the findings of a research organization that conducted research sponsored by the company, the advertisement must disclose the connection between the advertiser and the research organization. And a paid endorsement – like any other advertisement – is deceptive if it makes false or misleading claims.
Celebrity endorsers also are addressed in the revised Guides. While the 1980 Guides did not explicitly state that endorsers as well as advertisers could be liable under the FTC Act for statements they make in an endorsement, the revised Guides reflect Commission case law and clearly state that both advertisers and endorsers may be liable for false or unsubstantiated claims made in an endorsement – or for failure to disclose material connections between the advertiser and endorsers. The revised Guides also make it clear that celebrities have a duty to disclose their relationships with advertisers when making endorsements outside the context of traditional ads, such as on talk shows or in social media.
The Guides are administrative interpretations of the law intended to help advertisers comply with the Federal Trade Commission Act; they are not binding law themselves. In any law enforcement action challenging the allegedly deceptive use of testimonials or endorsements, the Commission would have the burden of proving that the challenged conduct violates the FTC Act.
The Commission vote approving issuance of the Federal Register notice detailing the changes was 4-0. The notice will be published in the Federal Register shortly, and is available now on the FTC’s Web site as a link to this press release. Copies also are available from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.
The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.
MEDIA CONTACT: 
Betsy Lordan
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-3707 
STAFF CONTACT: 
Richard Cleland
Bureau of Consumer Protection 
202-326-3088 
(FTC File No. P034520)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shame on you<br />
Wind Industry Sponsored Online Blogging Alive, Well and Against the Law?<br />
<a href="https://skydrive.live.com/?sc=photos&#038;cid=b6147304a619be64" rel="nofollow">https://skydrive.live.com/?sc=photos&#038;cid=b6147304a619be64</a></p>
<p>Posted by Whetstone_Willy on May 20, 2012 at 10:00am<br />
Send Message   View Blog<br />
The next time you read some bald faced pro-wind lies in an online post, consider that the blogger may be employed by an organization that has made this commenting part of his or her job. The employer could be a wind company but also a wind industry law firm, engineering firm, a paid off so called environmental group, an ornithologist who rigs bird studies, etc.<br />
It is now established fact that many of the pro-wind comments we see in online reader comments are the result of paid bloggers or bloggers otherwise employed by the wind industry or their mercenaries in the paid off environmental organizations.<br />
The following directives are taken from the Board of Directors of the American Wind Energy Association 11/2/11 meeting materials.<br />
&#8220;Respond quickly to unfavorable articles by posting comments online, using the AWEA blog and twitter, and putting out press releases&#8221;.<br />
&#8221; • Work with Grassroots team to recruit and activate a “Wind Army,” identifying state,    member and third-party surrogates to spread AWEA messages. Results: • Quadrupled size of online community from February to October, building online advocacy list from 25,000 to 113,000; plus LinkedIn at 8,000, Twitter at 12,500,     Facebook at 37,000, for a total online community of more than 172,000 and still     rapidly growing&#8221;.<br />
The PDF can be seen here:<br />
<a href="http://www.coalitionforsensiblesiting.com/doc/AWEAPolicyDoc-Nov2011" rel="nofollow">http://www.coalitionforsensiblesiting.com/doc/AWEAPolicyDoc-Nov2011</a>&#8230;<br />
I believe that this sort of paid blogging without disclosure may be illegal. Please see the red colored font below:<br />
For Release: 10/05/2009<br />
FTC Publishes Final Guides Governing Endorsements, Testimonials<br />
Changes Affect Testimonial Advertisements, Bloggers, Celebrity Endorsements<br />
The Federal Trade Commission today announced that it has approved final revisions to the guidance it gives to advertisers on how to keep their endorsement and testimonial ads in line with the FTC Act.<br />
The notice incorporates several changes to the FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, which address endorsements by consumers, experts, organizations, and celebrities, as well as the disclosure of important connections between advertisers and endorsers. The Guides were last updated in 1980.<br />
Thank you, Whetstone Willy<br />
Under the revised Guides, advertisements that feature a consumer and convey his or her experience with a product or service as typical when that is not the case will be required to clearly disclose the results that consumers can generally expect. In contrast to the 1980 version of the Guides – which allowed advertisers to describe unusual results in a testimonial as long as they included a disclaimer such as “results not typical” – the revised Guides no longer contain this safe harbor.<br />
The revised Guides also add new examples to illustrate the long standing principle that “material connections” (sometimes payments or free products) between advertisers and endorsers – connections that consumers would not expect – must be disclosed. These examples address what constitutes an endorsement when the message is conveyed by bloggers or other “word-of-mouth” marketers. The revised Guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service. Likewise, if a company refers in an advertisement to the findings of a research organization that conducted research sponsored by the company, the advertisement must disclose the connection between the advertiser and the research organization. And a paid endorsement – like any other advertisement – is deceptive if it makes false or misleading claims.<br />
Celebrity endorsers also are addressed in the revised Guides. While the 1980 Guides did not explicitly state that endorsers as well as advertisers could be liable under the FTC Act for statements they make in an endorsement, the revised Guides reflect Commission case law and clearly state that both advertisers and endorsers may be liable for false or unsubstantiated claims made in an endorsement – or for failure to disclose material connections between the advertiser and endorsers. The revised Guides also make it clear that celebrities have a duty to disclose their relationships with advertisers when making endorsements outside the context of traditional ads, such as on talk shows or in social media.<br />
The Guides are administrative interpretations of the law intended to help advertisers comply with the Federal Trade Commission Act; they are not binding law themselves. In any law enforcement action challenging the allegedly deceptive use of testimonials or endorsements, the Commission would have the burden of proving that the challenged conduct violates the FTC Act.<br />
The Commission vote approving issuance of the Federal Register notice detailing the changes was 4-0. The notice will be published in the Federal Register shortly, and is available now on the FTC’s Web site as a link to this press release. Copies also are available from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.<br />
The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.<br />
MEDIA CONTACT:<br />
Betsy Lordan<br />
Office of Public Affairs<br />
202-326-3707<br />
STAFF CONTACT:<br />
Richard Cleland<br />
Bureau of Consumer Protection <br />
202-326-3088<br />
(FTC File No. P034520)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/#comment-121587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37879#comment-121587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think you can sign anyway, no?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think you can sign anyway, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/#comment-120702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37879#comment-120702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This. U.K.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This. U.K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/10/you-can-support-a-huge-102-5-mw-wind-farm-in-wisconsin/#comment-120661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37879#comment-120661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a fantastic idea! I would sign, but I live in NZ. :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fantastic idea! I would sign, but I live in NZ. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":-(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
