<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why New Clean Energy Bill Cuts More CO2 than Climate Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 03:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re somewhat correct.

Power from coal (or nuclear) plants built some years ago and now paid off is pretty danged cheap.  And, of course, heavy electricity users are going to migrate to places where power is cheaper.  

Where your thinking breaks down is in not realizing that those older coal (and nuclear) plants are wearing out and will need to be replaced.  New coal (and nuclear) plants are very expensive.

You cannot generate power from a newly built coal (or nuclear) plants as cheaply as you can generate power from a new wind farm, geothermal plant, hydro plant and, in some parts of the country, a new solar array.

And we didn&#039;t even add in the extra cost of burning coal that eat up your tax dollars and raise you health insurance premiums. 

Do you know how much you&#039;re spending in tax and premium dollars because we&#039;re burning coal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re somewhat correct.</p>
<p>Power from coal (or nuclear) plants built some years ago and now paid off is pretty danged cheap.  And, of course, heavy electricity users are going to migrate to places where power is cheaper.  </p>
<p>Where your thinking breaks down is in not realizing that those older coal (and nuclear) plants are wearing out and will need to be replaced.  New coal (and nuclear) plants are very expensive.</p>
<p>You cannot generate power from a newly built coal (or nuclear) plants as cheaply as you can generate power from a new wind farm, geothermal plant, hydro plant and, in some parts of the country, a new solar array.</p>
<p>And we didn&#8217;t even add in the extra cost of burning coal that eat up your tax dollars and raise you health insurance premiums. </p>
<p>Do you know how much you&#8217;re spending in tax and premium dollars because we&#8217;re burning coal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOcitizen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MOcitizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The states that do rely mainly on coal are the same states that have lower electricity costs and a higher concentration of manufacturing. No wonder other countries are growing faster than the US while we struggle to rebound yet we&#039;re sitting on massive amounts of a secure energy source.  Sounds like the EPA is being influenced. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The states that do rely mainly on coal are the same states that have lower electricity costs and a higher concentration of manufacturing. No wonder other countries are growing faster than the US while we struggle to rebound yet we&#8217;re sitting on massive amounts of a secure energy source.  Sounds like the EPA is being influenced. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coal use in the US is dropping.

China will be capping their coal use in 2015.  

Any increase in use at the moment will likely be temporary.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal use in the US is dropping.</p>
<p>China will be capping their coal use in 2015.  </p>
<p>Any increase in use at the moment will likely be temporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wondering</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wondering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escalating energy prices for what?  The global demand for coal is surging.  We share the same planet.

http://www.powermag.com/coal/THE-BIG-PICTURE-Coal-Demand-Surges_4591.html

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Escalating energy prices for what?  The global demand for coal is surging.  We share the same planet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.powermag.com/coal/THE-BIG-PICTURE-Coal-Demand-Surges_4591.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.powermag.com/coal/THE-BIG-PICTURE-Coal-Demand-Surges_4591.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green News Daily: Tuesday, May 8th, 2012 - Resurrectedrestorations.com &#187; Resurrectedrestorations.com</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green News Daily: Tuesday, May 8th, 2012 - Resurrectedrestorations.com &#187; Resurrectedrestorations.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Clean Energy Bill Cuts More CO2 Than Climate Bill [CleanTechnica] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] New Clean Energy Bill Cuts More CO2 Than Climate Bill [CleanTechnica] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green News Daily: Tuesday, May 8th, 2012</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green News Daily: Tuesday, May 8th, 2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Clean Energy Bill Cuts More CO2 Than Climate Bill [CleanTechnica] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] New Clean Energy Bill Cuts More CO2 Than Climate Bill [CleanTechnica] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Word, 5-8-12 &#124; New Mexico Telegram</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/07/why-new-ces-bill-cuts-more-co2-than-climate-bill/#comment-120378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morning Word, 5-8-12 &#124; New Mexico Telegram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 06:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37700#comment-120378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sen. Jeff Bingaman&#8217;s clean energy bill would cut more CO2 emissions than a proposed climate bill. Of course, neither have a very good chance of passing while Republicans are willing to filibuster [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sen. Jeff Bingaman&#8217;s clean energy bill would cut more CO2 emissions than a proposed climate bill. Of course, neither have a very good chance of passing while Republicans are willing to filibuster [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
