<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Stronger EU CO2 Target Would Benefit Country that Blocked It, &amp; Cost EU Citizens a Few Cups of Coffee on Average</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/01/report-stronger-eu-co2-target-would-benefit-country-that-blocked-it-cost-eu-citizens-a-few-cups-of-coffee-on-average/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/01/report-stronger-eu-co2-target-would-benefit-country-that-blocked-it-cost-eu-citizens-a-few-cups-of-coffee-on-average/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Germany Pushes (Again) for Stronger EU Carbon Emissions Cuts - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/01/report-stronger-eu-co2-target-would-benefit-country-that-blocked-it-cost-eu-citizens-a-few-cups-of-coffee-on-average/#comment-122033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Germany Pushes (Again) for Stronger EU Carbon Emissions Cuts - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37629#comment-122033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] from 20% by 2020 to 30% by 2020, despite the fact that such a policy change would result in a net benefit for Poland! Perhaps hoping that Poland would come around following the report showing that to be the case, or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from 20% by 2020 to 30% by 2020, despite the fact that such a policy change would result in a net benefit for Poland! Perhaps hoping that Poland would come around following the report showing that to be the case, or [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/01/report-stronger-eu-co2-target-would-benefit-country-that-blocked-it-cost-eu-citizens-a-few-cups-of-coffee-on-average/#comment-119902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37629#comment-119902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all the externalities of reduced air pollution, improved health, more secure supply, better balance of payments, and modernised power systems were included in looks like a no brainer to adjust the target from 20% to 30% by 2020. 

Whatever about the rest of them, Belgium isn&#039;t a basket case, but I&#039;d be happy to see them all including the Belgiums getting a few euros more than their fair share on the restricted cost analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all the externalities of reduced air pollution, improved health, more secure supply, better balance of payments, and modernised power systems were included in looks like a no brainer to adjust the target from 20% to 30% by 2020. </p>
<p>Whatever about the rest of them, Belgium isn&#8217;t a basket case, but I&#8217;d be happy to see them all including the Belgiums getting a few euros more than their fair share on the restricted cost analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
