<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Business Owners: Federal Clean Energy Investment Creates Jobs, Growth; EPA Emissions Regs a Good Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/30/small-business-owners-federal-clean-energy-investment-creates-jobs-growth-epa-emissions-regs-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/30/small-business-owners-federal-clean-energy-investment-creates-jobs-growth-epa-emissions-regs-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Schach</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/30/small-business-owners-federal-clean-energy-investment-creates-jobs-growth-epa-emissions-regs-a-good-thing/#comment-119831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florian Schach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37591#comment-119831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being on the progressive end of the environmental practices is great for the US. However even with the best of intentions the EPA&#039;s timing and implementation of such rules needs a lot of work. Regulations such as these can be a bit much to bear (http://bit.ly/zgsTLu). Because of this we as whole suffer from over-regulation and no real economic progress which can cost jobs that we need now and down the line. It is no wonder that EPA regulations are at the forefront of a number of political discussions. Going forward  we need to work on the transition that these new regulations are going to take on everyone. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being on the progressive end of the environmental practices is great for the US. However even with the best of intentions the EPA&#8217;s timing and implementation of such rules needs a lot of work. Regulations such as these can be a bit much to bear (<a href="http://bit.ly/zgsTLu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/zgsTLu</a>). Because of this we as whole suffer from over-regulation and no real economic progress which can cost jobs that we need now and down the line. It is no wonder that EPA regulations are at the forefront of a number of political discussions. Going forward  we need to work on the transition that these new regulations are going to take on everyone. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/30/small-business-owners-federal-clean-energy-investment-creates-jobs-growth-epa-emissions-regs-a-good-thing/#comment-119815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37591#comment-119815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP reps/senators are not voting with Small Business or general GOP members; when it comes to clean air/water, green jobs, or the economy in general. I wonder who does have their vote? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP reps/senators are not voting with Small Business or general GOP members; when it comes to clean air/water, green jobs, or the economy in general. I wonder who does have their vote? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
