<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8.5/10 Brits Want More Clean Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/#comment-119772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37461#comment-119772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That last comment made me laugh. Seriously, that is my response (non-verbally) every tie I hear about such ridiculous complaints -- probably doesn&#039;t help that I like how they look, but still... are we bloody idiots?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last comment made me laugh. Seriously, that is my response (non-verbally) every tie I hear about such ridiculous complaints &#8212; probably doesn&#8217;t help that I like how they look, but still&#8230; are we bloody idiots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/#comment-119704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37461#comment-119704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blades spin, and apparently that is enough to put people off. Which is absolutely ridiculous.

Yes - were going to stop our progress tackling climate change because you can see a small rotating object a few miles away. Absolutely f*g stupid. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blades spin, and apparently that is enough to put people off. Which is absolutely ridiculous.</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; were going to stop our progress tackling climate change because you can see a small rotating object a few miles away. Absolutely f*g stupid. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/#comment-119691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Blanchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37461#comment-119691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cannot image that the 1.5 out of 10 want *dirtier* power; but maybe they don&#039;t think there is a problem with the power we have?  

Maybe it would make more sense to say 17 out of 20 people want cleaner power?  I can&#039;t imagine what is not to like about cleaner power.  A burning turbine is not a problem, compared to a burning nuclear plant; or even a coal plant.

Neil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot image that the 1.5 out of 10 want *dirtier* power; but maybe they don&#8217;t think there is a problem with the power we have?  </p>
<p>Maybe it would make more sense to say 17 out of 20 people want cleaner power?  I can&#8217;t imagine what is not to like about cleaner power.  A burning turbine is not a problem, compared to a burning nuclear plant; or even a coal plant.</p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/#comment-119655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37461#comment-119655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot is media conditioning. The papers are frequently going off alarming about how ugly turbines are. 
The one turbine in Scotland that caught fire in gale force winds was front page news, as was the news that turbines will be installed on Royal land despite Prince Charles&#039; protestations about how ugly they are--his comments are usually treated with derision, now suddenly he&#039;s an authority to be listened to.
All that coupled with blatant opinion masquerading as information on the capabilities of wind and tidal and you have one woefully misled public.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot is media conditioning. The papers are frequently going off alarming about how ugly turbines are.<br />
The one turbine in Scotland that caught fire in gale force winds was front page news, as was the news that turbines will be installed on Royal land despite Prince Charles&#8217; protestations about how ugly they are&#8211;his comments are usually treated with derision, now suddenly he&#8217;s an authority to be listened to.<br />
All that coupled with blatant opinion masquerading as information on the capabilities of wind and tidal and you have one woefully misled public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/#comment-119650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37461#comment-119650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is, they may all want clean energy - just not in their backyard. And since everywhere turns out to be someones backyard, the overall progress meter stays at close to zero. For example, while browsing information about the Atlantic Array, look what I found:

http://www.atlanticarray.co.uk/

:(

P.S. I think EON Renewables should damn well take control of that web address - as it seems like an official project page just by looking at the URL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is, they may all want clean energy &#8211; just not in their backyard. And since everywhere turns out to be someones backyard, the overall progress meter stays at close to zero. For example, while browsing information about the Atlantic Array, look what I found:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.atlanticarray.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.atlanticarray.co.uk/</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>P.S. I think EON Renewables should damn well take control of that web address &#8211; as it seems like an official project page just by looking at the URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/27/8-510-brits-want-more-clean-energy/#comment-119629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37461#comment-119629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And if you&#039;re in the UK and want to support a company supporting renewables with real reinvestment of your money from your bills: ecotricity.co.uk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you&#8217;re in the UK and want to support a company supporting renewables with real reinvestment of your money from your bills: ecotricity.co.uk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
