<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Californians are Getting Cheap Renewable Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/#comment-119642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37418#comment-119642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently these are the ones listed here
http://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/by_project.cfm
as &#039;BrightSource PG&amp;E 3–7&#039;. 

The first one was supposed to break ground in 2011, so that&#039;s definitely been delayed. The next two were expected to break ground in 2012. Which could still happen, but googling &quot;brightsource coyote springs&quot; isn&#039;t encouraging. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently these are the ones listed here<br />
<a href="http://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/by_project.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/by_project.cfm</a><br />
as &#8216;BrightSource PG&amp;E 3–7&#8242;. </p>
<p>The first one was supposed to break ground in 2011, so that&#8217;s definitely been delayed. The next two were expected to break ground in 2012. Which could still happen, but googling &#8220;brightsource coyote springs&#8221; isn&#8217;t encouraging. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/#comment-119630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37418#comment-119630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, Bill. No, the CPUC would hardly list &quot;placeholders&quot;! These are all projects that have been rigorously permitted by dozens of bureaucracies down to county level officials over two or more years! Read through the excel file from the CPUC yourself; you&#039;ll see contracts for 5 200 MW BrightSource projects as well as others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, Bill. No, the CPUC would hardly list &#8220;placeholders&#8221;! These are all projects that have been rigorously permitted by dozens of bureaucracies down to county level officials over two or more years! Read through the excel file from the CPUC yourself; you&#8217;ll see contracts for 5 200 MW BrightSource projects as well as others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/#comment-119624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37418#comment-119624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The 1,000 MW BrightSource project is listed as five 200 MW projects, that come on line one after the other, and these have not been delayed, ...&quot;

Are these real projects, or just some sort of placeholder? The BrightSource website doesn&#039;t list anything that matches that description. In addition to Ivanpah, it only lists Hidden Hills (2 x 250 MW, in Inyo County, CA) and Rio Mesa (3 x 250 MW, in Riverside County, CA). 
http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/projects]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The 1,000 MW BrightSource project is listed as five 200 MW projects, that come on line one after the other, and these have not been delayed, &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Are these real projects, or just some sort of placeholder? The BrightSource website doesn&#8217;t list anything that matches that description. In addition to Ivanpah, it only lists Hidden Hills (2 x 250 MW, in Inyo County, CA) and Rio Mesa (3 x 250 MW, in Riverside County, CA).<br />
<a href="http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/projects" rel="nofollow">http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/projects</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brak</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/#comment-119586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37418#comment-119586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They haven&#039;t got hydrogen storage going yet, but they are going to try it out with a pilot project.  What is starting to be done is using natural gas in fuel cells for cogeneration, providing both heat and electricity on a small, convenient scale.  Provided there is a use for the heat, it&#039;s as efficient as a large scale combined gas cycle plant which are usually a bit too large to put in a building basement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They haven&#8217;t got hydrogen storage going yet, but they are going to try it out with a pilot project.  What is starting to be done is using natural gas in fuel cells for cogeneration, providing both heat and electricity on a small, convenient scale.  Provided there is a use for the heat, it&#8217;s as efficient as a large scale combined gas cycle plant which are usually a bit too large to put in a building basement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bailo</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/26/how-californians-are-getting-cheap-renewable-energy/#comment-119583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bailo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37418#comment-119583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany is currently delivering baseload power using renewable solar and wind coupled with hydrogen produced during optimal generating times.

They are able to occasionally have off peak rates at peak demand times because of this efficiency...they don&#039;t have to spin up coal or other sources.

This model is being proven every day.   Why aren&#039;t we using hydrogen production and fuel cells at utilities to make baseload possible with renewable solar, wind and dam power?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Germany is currently delivering baseload power using renewable solar and wind coupled with hydrogen produced during optimal generating times.</p>
<p>They are able to occasionally have off peak rates at peak demand times because of this efficiency&#8230;they don&#8217;t have to spin up coal or other sources.</p>
<p>This model is being proven every day.   Why aren&#8217;t we using hydrogen production and fuel cells at utilities to make baseload possible with renewable solar, wind and dam power?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
