<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/22/solar-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/22/solar-news/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/22/solar-news/#comment-119771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37282#comment-119771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Sager</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/22/solar-news/#comment-119696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Sager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37282#comment-119696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McKinsey&#039;s comment on their assessment industry in &quot;growth pains&quot; vs. &quot;death throws&quot; must be correct.  Without even going through their assessment (Which I will do after typing):  Solar will continue to grow for two very simple reasons:  (1)  The technology always has application on a micro scale irrespective of grid-scale or public incentives &amp; (2) Cost reductions have delivered for 3 decades more or less consistently and improvements, once attained are not lost.  Bottom line: There is NOTHING to suggest cost reductions in the hardware will not continue.  Suddenly, National Solar is announcing $3.5 per watt installations that sound very &quot;Germanesesque.&quot; in metrics.  Yes hardware gradually bumps up against an asymptotic installation.  So?  The competition, just gets more expensive and volatile over time.  kyle sager helioshirt.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKinsey&#8217;s comment on their assessment industry in &#8220;growth pains&#8221; vs. &#8220;death throws&#8221; must be correct.  Without even going through their assessment (Which I will do after typing):  Solar will continue to grow for two very simple reasons:  (1)  The technology always has application on a micro scale irrespective of grid-scale or public incentives &amp; (2) Cost reductions have delivered for 3 decades more or less consistently and improvements, once attained are not lost.  Bottom line: There is NOTHING to suggest cost reductions in the hardware will not continue.  Suddenly, National Solar is announcing $3.5 per watt installations that sound very &#8220;Germanesesque.&#8221; in metrics.  Yes hardware gradually bumps up against an asymptotic installation.  So?  The competition, just gets more expensive and volatile over time.  kyle sager helioshirt.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
