<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Advocates Like Preliminary CPUC Decision to Boost Clean Energy in California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/16/solar-advocates-like-preliminary-puc-decision-to-boost-clean-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/16/solar-advocates-like-preliminary-puc-decision-to-boost-clean-energy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter ODonnell</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/16/solar-advocates-like-preliminary-puc-decision-to-boost-clean-energy/#comment-118639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter ODonnell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37069#comment-118639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Peevey is the lion-tamer for the shareholder owned utilities in California, short-sighted though they are.  If they are paid to perform, paid to embrace their corporate responsibility, perhaps they will remember they work for their own children too.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Peevey is the lion-tamer for the shareholder owned utilities in California, short-sighted though they are.  If they are paid to perform, paid to embrace their corporate responsibility, perhaps they will remember they work for their own children too.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/16/solar-advocates-like-preliminary-puc-decision-to-boost-clean-energy/#comment-118530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=37069#comment-118530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus net meeting of solar is a money maker for the electric distribution portion of a Utility. Since the extra solar is &quot;on-line&quot; during peak energy time. So the distribution company &quot;trades&quot; low peak power minutes to the PV provider for high peak min when the PV over produces.

Now for the coal plant portion of a Utilitiy company it isn&#039;t so good, since they get to run less during peak.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus net meeting of solar is a money maker for the electric distribution portion of a Utility. Since the extra solar is &#8220;on-line&#8221; during peak energy time. So the distribution company &#8220;trades&#8221; low peak power minutes to the PV provider for high peak min when the PV over produces.</p>
<p>Now for the coal plant portion of a Utilitiy company it isn&#8217;t so good, since they get to run less during peak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
