<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 25 US Cities for Energy Star Buildings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/12/top-us-cities-energy-star-buildings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/12/top-us-cities-energy-star-buildings/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/12/top-us-cities-energy-star-buildings/#comment-118145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36953#comment-118145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I know, would be nice if it were put in relative terms of some sort or another, like % of spft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, would be nice if it were put in relative terms of some sort or another, like % of spft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/04/12/top-us-cities-energy-star-buildings/#comment-118127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36953#comment-118127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This report would have been even better with one more piece of data. A ranking based on percent of sqft. It would be a little more level field. A &quot;small&quot; city like Cincinnati or Colorado Spring will likely never have more buildings (of any type) than a big town like L.A, Boston, DC. So a ranking based on percent of Sqft that is Energy Star might be very different.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This report would have been even better with one more piece of data. A ranking based on percent of sqft. It would be a little more level field. A &#8220;small&#8221; city like Cincinnati or Colorado Spring will likely never have more buildings (of any type) than a big town like L.A, Boston, DC. So a ranking based on percent of Sqft that is Energy Star might be very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
