did you ever read things on the subject?

read excess heat… if you dare.

http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/lenr%20home%20page/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf (it is a pdf don’t be afraid)

Spawar? just navy skunwork team? don’t they apply emerging steam power for navy in the old time ?

Did you say me support crackpot… I just have disdain for anti-scientific crackpotery like critics of lewis, Gary taubes, Huizenga.

Just read that wikipedia article

http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/293wikipedia.html

BTW: strange that trolling ? do you want to muddy the water for a client? a bit late.

ALL Scientists (except ones that support you) are full of

s_it Every hair brained half AS_ED idea is right!

SPAWAR!

Like you even know what it means!

Because you post on every BS Blog about every conspiracy

to hide “LENR” or whatever who are you?

AND who cares?

Alain Coetmeur!

Another self important (Bill Beatty VORTEX)
AS_HOLE

ALL Scientists (except ones that support you) are full of

s_it Every hair brained half AS_ED idea is right!

SPAWAR!

Like you even know what it means!

Because you post on every BS Blog about every conspiracy

to hide “LENR” or whatever who are you?

AND who cares?

Alain Coetmeur!

Another self important (Bill Beatty VORTEX)
AS_HOLEIO

If you have read the book “Excess Heat” by Charles Beaudette http://iccf9.global.tsinghua.edu.cn/lenr%20home%20page/acrobat/BeaudetteCexcessheat.pdf

and the articles cited, and the absence of critical article that were not rebutted about the LENR calorimetry of McKubre, Fleischmann, and others (ok it tooks few years to confirm LENR), then you would know LENr is a confirmed science… since the 90s.

For Rossi, if you have read the answer of Bo Hoistad on the Pomp&Eriksson you will know those physicist are conspiracy theorist like many physicist are on LENR.

find serious argument, and not conspiracy theory.

and please no strawman attach.
I trust Elforsk due dilligence, McKubre after checked by garwin and Lewis visit, not your biased opinion, neither the other parrots who refuse to read the dissenting data.

I would suggest people apply an unusually high level of skepticism. (For those who are ‘confused’, skepticism is not the same as denial.)

Rossi has no background in chemistry or nuclear physics. His degree is in philosophy and ran a company that worked on turning waste in to oil.

Two options here. 1) Rossi, a guy with no apparent background experience in energy outside of waste processing has made one of the great discoveries of all times or 2) he’s “bending spoons”.

I need to see this turned over to multiple major labs for conformation.

Rossi’s lack of patents claims is BS. Major universities and government labs would sign non-disclosure agreements. If the ‘secret sauce’ was disclosed any court would give him full control over future manufacturing just as if he had patents.

He could sign a non-disclosure agreement with someone and give them a 0.01% share in the business to get the million or so it would take to get world wide patents.

If he is really selling these things, as he claims, someone could buy one and hacksaw it open. And he has no patent.

Comments from author of the scientific paper on Rossi’s E-Cat HT machine.

Cold Fusion gets red hot and aims for EU

24 MAY 13 by DAVID HAMBLING

The resurgence of “cold fusion” research just shifted up a gear with the most remarkable development yet.

http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Celani_ICCF17_Trasp3.pdf

They are not declaring that they have a working project ready for private investment.

and many other, and enjoy critics.
We need it. It make bad argument dies and find good arguments and reasoning. And also it can correct wrong beliefs.

Every morning I’m afraid to be wrong, and check the counter-arguments…