<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Nuclear Power Plans Trashed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-117018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-117018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re interested in the economics of nuclear you might want to read this....

http://www.mng.org.uk/gh/private/risks_of_nuclear_investment_published.pdf

It&#039;s written for people who might be thinking of investing in new nuclear.  I think it does an excellent job of laying out the arguments and backs them up with many references.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested in the economics of nuclear you might want to read this&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mng.org.uk/gh/private/risks_of_nuclear_investment_published.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.mng.org.uk/gh/private/risks_of_nuclear_investment_published.pdf</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s written for people who might be thinking of investing in new nuclear.  I think it does an excellent job of laying out the arguments and backs them up with many references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasGerke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-117016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThomasGerke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-117016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When they did throw money down the drain, it was usually not their money...
;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they did throw money down the drain, it was usually not their money&#8230;<br />
<img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasGerke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-117015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThomasGerke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-117015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed. 
Especially since E.On complained about the expansion of renewables endangering the profitability of new nuclear power plants in the UK back in 2010. 

This &quot;warning&quot; to the british government made quite some headlines in Germany, where the govenrment was pushing a lifetime extension for nuclear power stations and the Lobby pushing articles about how cheap nuclear truely is at the very same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.<br />
Especially since E.On complained about the expansion of renewables endangering the profitability of new nuclear power plants in the UK back in 2010. </p>
<p>This &#8220;warning&#8221; to the british government made quite some headlines in Germany, where the govenrment was pushing a lifetime extension for nuclear power stations and the Lobby pushing articles about how cheap nuclear truely is at the very same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-117008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-117008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And that&#039;s the story, morning glory. :D

(Businesses aren&#039;t going to throw their money down the drain forever.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s the story, morning glory. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>(Businesses aren&#8217;t going to throw their money down the drain forever.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-117001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-117001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;E.ON wanted to focus on other more short-term strategic projects that delivered quicker benefits.&quot;
Or said another way
Nuclear is too big a risk, there are smart ways to make energy and money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;E.ON wanted to focus on other more short-term strategic projects that delivered quicker benefits.&#8221;<br />
Or said another way<br />
Nuclear is too big a risk, there are smart ways to make energy and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-116998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-116998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I got the impression there was good effort to hide every anti-nuke/pro-decentralized energy they could.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I got the impression there was good effort to hide every anti-nuke/pro-decentralized energy they could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-116922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-116922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s kind of like facts in one country are also facts in another country....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of like facts in one country are also facts in another country&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasGerke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/30/more-nuclear-power-plans-trashed/#comment-116911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThomasGerke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36565#comment-116911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s fascinating how the statements echoed in the UK Press slightly differ from the statements made by E.Ons CEO in the German press:

&quot;We&#039;ve come to the conclusion that investments in decentralized renewable energy sources &amp; energy efficency are more attractive for us &amp; the british customers&quot;

Mhh... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fascinating how the statements echoed in the UK Press slightly differ from the statements made by E.Ons CEO in the German press:</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that investments in decentralized renewable energy sources &amp; energy efficency are more attractive for us &amp; the british customers&#8221;</p>
<p>Mhh&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
