<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worldwide Solar Cell Production in 2011 = 37.2 GW (Up 36%)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/28/worldwide-solar-cell-production-in-2011-37-2-gw-up-36/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/28/worldwide-solar-cell-production-in-2011-37-2-gw-up-36/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/28/worldwide-solar-cell-production-in-2011-37-2-gw-up-36/#comment-116980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36514#comment-116980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh... Of course it should.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh&#8230; Of course it should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/28/worldwide-solar-cell-production-in-2011-37-2-gw-up-36/#comment-116845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36514#comment-116845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;... the 120% growth spurt in the sector in 2012, ...&quot;; should be &#039;in 2010&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; the 120% growth spurt in the sector in 2012, &#8230;&#8221;; should be &#8216;in 2010&#8242;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/28/worldwide-solar-cell-production-in-2011-37-2-gw-up-36/#comment-116794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36514#comment-116794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you can check the numbers published by other PV research firms such as PVinsights,...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you can check the numbers published by other PV research firms such as PVinsights,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
