<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget Algae Biofuel, Navy Jets Could Run on Toothpicks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/22/forget-algae-biofuel-navy-jets-could-run-on-toothpicks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/22/forget-algae-biofuel-navy-jets-could-run-on-toothpicks/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Claven</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/22/forget-algae-biofuel-navy-jets-could-run-on-toothpicks/#comment-116228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cliff Claven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36296#comment-116228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so we are going to pay one company (Cobalt) to start with cellulose and food waste and make butanol, then ship that intermediate product to another company (Albemarle) and pay then to apply another complex process to turn butanol into jet fuel.  Honeywell UOP is already under a $1.1M government contract to produce 100 gallons of this alcohol-to-jet fuel ($11,000 a gallon) this year.  This is merely the second step in the above process.  Add to this price the cost to make alcohol from cellulose (a process that has bankrupted Cello and Gevo and Range Fuels), and we should have an approach that can compete with the $2.30 a gallon the U.S. military is currently paying for conventional jet fuel.  Not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so we are going to pay one company (Cobalt) to start with cellulose and food waste and make butanol, then ship that intermediate product to another company (Albemarle) and pay then to apply another complex process to turn butanol into jet fuel.  Honeywell UOP is already under a $1.1M government contract to produce 100 gallons of this alcohol-to-jet fuel ($11,000 a gallon) this year.  This is merely the second step in the above process.  Add to this price the cost to make alcohol from cellulose (a process that has bankrupted Cello and Gevo and Range Fuels), and we should have an approach that can compete with the $2.30 a gallon the U.S. military is currently paying for conventional jet fuel.  Not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green News Daily: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/22/forget-algae-biofuel-navy-jets-could-run-on-toothpicks/#comment-116158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green News Daily: Thursday, March 22nd, 2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=36296#comment-116158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] U.S. Navy Warplanes To Test Wood-Based Butonal Fuel [CleanTechnica] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] U.S. Navy Warplanes To Test Wood-Based Butonal Fuel [CleanTechnica] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
