<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Wind Down, Nuclear Up as UK Rethinks Energy Mix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/new-wind-down-nuclear-up-as-uk-rethinks-energy-mix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/new-wind-down-nuclear-up-as-uk-rethinks-energy-mix/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/new-wind-down-nuclear-up-as-uk-rethinks-energy-mix/#comment-114848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35355#comment-114848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, we know all about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we know all about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/new-wind-down-nuclear-up-as-uk-rethinks-energy-mix/#comment-114704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35355#comment-114704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is excellent.

If you&#039;re in favor of Brits spending more for electricity and increasing the pile of hazardous radioactive waste they&#039;re leaving their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, ....

What is it with Britain and its former colonies, Australia, Canada and the US?  Is there something in the genetic Brit gene poll that creates stupid conservative parties?  

Is it perhaps a desire to grieve the loss of Empire by just destroying the planet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is excellent.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re in favor of Brits spending more for electricity and increasing the pile of hazardous radioactive waste they&#8217;re leaving their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, &#8230;.</p>
<p>What is it with Britain and its former colonies, Australia, Canada and the US?  Is there something in the genetic Brit gene poll that creates stupid conservative parties?  </p>
<p>Is it perhaps a desire to grieve the loss of Empire by just destroying the planet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregorynorminton</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/new-wind-down-nuclear-up-as-uk-rethinks-energy-mix/#comment-114703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregorynorminton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35355#comment-114703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, the Conservative party&#039;s electorate is fed a daily diet of nonsense by the rightwing press: endless junk science and unbalanced reporting to feed an anti-renewables backlash. These same publications - The Mail, the Telegraph, The Spectator, and to a lesser degree the Murdoch papers - are also full of outright climate change denial. And although the Prime Minister seems to know better (he has access to experts, rather than hacks), he hasn&#039;t the guts to challenge the obscurantism in public. So British conservatism slides towards the same strategic blindness that now pervades the Republican Party. It&#039;s quite concerning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the Conservative party&#8217;s electorate is fed a daily diet of nonsense by the rightwing press: endless junk science and unbalanced reporting to feed an anti-renewables backlash. These same publications &#8211; The Mail, the Telegraph, The Spectator, and to a lesser degree the Murdoch papers &#8211; are also full of outright climate change denial. And although the Prime Minister seems to know better (he has access to experts, rather than hacks), he hasn&#8217;t the guts to challenge the obscurantism in public. So British conservatism slides towards the same strategic blindness that now pervades the Republican Party. It&#8217;s quite concerning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/new-wind-down-nuclear-up-as-uk-rethinks-energy-mix/#comment-114696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35355#comment-114696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
