<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renewables Now Cheaper than Coal in Michigan, Could Be $5-Billion Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcacci Communications</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-141831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcacci Communications]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-141831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Independent economists have estimated a 25 percent RES in Michigan will create $10 billion in new investment and more than 56,000 jobs – on top of the existing 20,500 jobs and $5 billion in economic activity already supported by the state’s clean energy industry. State analysts estimate the current RPS has spurred $100 million in economic activity and made newrenewables cheaper than coal generation. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Independent economists have estimated a 25 percent RES in Michigan will create $10 billion in new investment and more than 56,000 jobs – on top of the existing 20,500 jobs and $5 billion in economic activity already supported by the state’s clean energy industry. State analysts estimate the current RPS has spurred $100 million in economic activity and made newrenewables cheaper than coal generation. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Renewable Revolution is Here. Will the US Compete? &#171; Climate Denial Crock of the Week</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-124301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Renewable Revolution is Here. Will the US Compete? &#171; Climate Denial Crock of the Week]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-124301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Validating the cost effectiveness of clean energy, the Michigan Public Service Commission has determine that wind energy in Michigan costs about 40% less t... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Validating the cost effectiveness of clean energy, the Michigan Public Service Commission has determine that wind energy in Michigan costs about 40% less t&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-114807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-114807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study is talking about new coal. And existing plant just has the fuel and operation to pay for, for the most part. But new production is a diff story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study is talking about new coal. And existing plant just has the fuel and operation to pay for, for the most part. But new production is a diff story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Van Damme</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-114801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Van Damme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-114801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awful lot of water going down the St. Clair river, doing nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful lot of water going down the St. Clair river, doing nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T_</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-114673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-114673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Becouse you have to have constant wind blowing or sun shining 24/7, which is obviously not possible. And there are not enough ways to store the produced energy for the periods when the sun is not shinig/wind blowing. So, for now we need the old infrastructure, becouse the new one cannot do the job. But it is catching up fast and this is very nice! :-)))]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becouse you have to have constant wind blowing or sun shining 24/7, which is obviously not possible. And there are not enough ways to store the produced energy for the periods when the sun is not shinig/wind blowing. So, for now we need the old infrastructure, becouse the new one cannot do the job. But it is catching up fast and this is very nice! :-)))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curly4</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-114620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curly4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-114620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why don&#039;t  Michigan shut down the old technology and use only this new technology? It looks like it would be cheaper and save the customers money  or they could charge the same price and the state could take the difference to balance its  budget.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why don&#8217;t  Michigan shut down the old technology and use only this new technology? It looks like it would be cheaper and save the customers money  or they could charge the same price and the state could take the difference to balance its  budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green News Roundup: Wednesday, February 29th, 2012</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/28/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-in-michigan-could-be-5-billion-industry/#comment-114614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green News Roundup: Wednesday, February 29th, 2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=35303#comment-114614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Renewable Energy Cheaper Than Coal In Michigan [CleanTechnica] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Renewable Energy Cheaper Than Coal In Michigan [CleanTechnica] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
