<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Conservation at Home (9 Tips from ENERGY STAR)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/16/energy-conservation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/16/energy-conservation/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/16/energy-conservation/#comment-113696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34994#comment-113696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; many of those old TVs are replaced by big, flat-panel versions that use double the energy&quot;

How about we go slow on that claim?  My sister recently bought a 55&quot; TV that pulls only 40  watts.  My old 20&quot; CRT computer monitor pulled 150 watts.  In  2008 the average 25&quot; TV used 150 watts.

---

I&#039;ve checked my newer power bricks with a Watt-O-Meter and they pull no power when the connected device is not being used.   That includes battery chargers.

---

If one wants a larger monitor  than a laptop provides then using a netbook is a good alternative.  My ASUS netbook pulls only 15 watts.  I plug in a 20&quot; monitor (35 watts), external keyboard and trackball.  

All the functionality of a desk top with a lot less power usage.  Plenty of processing power for internet/word processing stuff.  I can process RAW images fairly fast. 

And it travels well.  Hardly notice it in my pack.

--

Missed here - light bulbs.  It&#039;s time to switch out the most used lamps to CFLs or LEDs.  CFLs are the best value right now but LEDs are coming on strong.  About 11% of residential power use goes to lighting.  We could cut that by 75% and save money at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; many of those old TVs are replaced by big, flat-panel versions that use double the energy&#8221;</p>
<p>How about we go slow on that claim?  My sister recently bought a 55&#8243; TV that pulls only 40  watts.  My old 20&#8243; CRT computer monitor pulled 150 watts.  In  2008 the average 25&#8243; TV used 150 watts.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve checked my newer power bricks with a Watt-O-Meter and they pull no power when the connected device is not being used.   That includes battery chargers.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>If one wants a larger monitor  than a laptop provides then using a netbook is a good alternative.  My ASUS netbook pulls only 15 watts.  I plug in a 20&#8243; monitor (35 watts), external keyboard and trackball.  </p>
<p>All the functionality of a desk top with a lot less power usage.  Plenty of processing power for internet/word processing stuff.  I can process RAW images fairly fast. </p>
<p>And it travels well.  Hardly notice it in my pack.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Missed here &#8211; light bulbs.  It&#8217;s time to switch out the most used lamps to CFLs or LEDs.  CFLs are the best value right now but LEDs are coming on strong.  About 11% of residential power use goes to lighting.  We could cut that by 75% and save money at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/16/energy-conservation/#comment-113674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff McIntire-Strasburg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34994#comment-113674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the share, Zach... I was thrilled that Denise was willing to do this for us!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the share, Zach&#8230; I was thrilled that Denise was willing to do this for us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
