<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Battery Could Mean More-Efficient Solar Energy Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/new-battery-could-mean-more-efficient-solar-energy-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/new-battery-could-mean-more-efficient-solar-energy-storage/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/new-battery-could-mean-more-efficient-solar-energy-storage/#comment-118837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34870#comment-118837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure where you get that last line. A ton of non-rich families are going solar these days. Generally, folks MAKE money on solar in the long run. And for those who can&#039;t buy a system for some reason, there&#039;s now leasing with as low as $0 up front --- and still savings in the long term. It&#039;s more than affordable --- it&#039;s a money-maker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure where you get that last line. A ton of non-rich families are going solar these days. Generally, folks MAKE money on solar in the long run. And for those who can&#8217;t buy a system for some reason, there&#8217;s now leasing with as low as $0 up front &#8212; and still savings in the long term. It&#8217;s more than affordable &#8212; it&#8217;s a money-maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phylliss</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/new-battery-could-mean-more-efficient-solar-energy-storage/#comment-118779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phylliss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34870#comment-118779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But more testing will be required before being implemented in commercial photovoltaic system
I wish there wasn&#039;t such a &#039;wait&#039; and long &#039;trial&#039; period, before putting things in the market.  Solar power is the way to go, but seriously its too expensive, for anyone but the rich.   
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But more testing will be required before being implemented in commercial photovoltaic system<br />
I wish there wasn&#8217;t such a &#8216;wait&#8217; and long &#8216;trial&#8217; period, before putting things in the market.  Solar power is the way to go, but seriously its too expensive, for anyone but the rich.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
