<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Cleaner Cheaper? The Cincinnatti Blimp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cincinnati Could Be 100% Powered By Renewables This Year</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cincinnati Could Be 100% Powered By Renewables This Year]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nearly 100 people testified in favor of the initiative at a recent public hearing, and Greenpeace recently flew a “Cleaner Is Cheaper” blimp over the city to highlight the externalities associated with coal power, annually estimated at 200 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Nearly 100 people testified in favor of the initiative at a recent public hearing, and Greenpeace recently flew a “Cleaner Is Cheaper” blimp over the city to highlight the externalities associated with coal power, annually estimated at 200 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Study: EV More Polluting than Petrol??! Not So Fast.. - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Study: EV More Polluting than Petrol??! Not So Fast.. - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] power plant a week. The cost of operating such plants, however, is not only the coal but the externality of pollution associated with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] power plant a week. The cost of operating such plants, however, is not only the coal but the externality of pollution associated with [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure what you mean. What&#039;s your specific correction?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what you mean. What&#8217;s your specific correction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you like blimps, try my Gasbags lighter than air comedy web site:
3w dot hybridblimp dot net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like blimps, try my Gasbags lighter than air comedy web site:<br />
3w dot hybridblimp dot net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jcn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jcn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the point about the foisting of &quot;external&quot; costs onto the public, but which city are we talking about? The Cincinnatti of the headline and hyperlinks, or the Cincinnati of the body?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the point about the foisting of &#8220;external&#8221; costs onto the public, but which city are we talking about? The Cincinnatti of the headline and hyperlinks, or the Cincinnati of the body?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/13/is-cleaner-cheaper-the-cincinnatti-blimp/#comment-113423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34866#comment-113423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems externalities fall under microeconomics but I don&#039;t understand why because at the transaction level the cost isn&#039;t there, so I always assumed externalities would fall under the macro heading...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems externalities fall under microeconomics but I don&#8217;t understand why because at the transaction level the cost isn&#8217;t there, so I always assumed externalities would fall under the macro heading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
