<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy-Monitoring Companies Go to Battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/10/energy-monitoring-companies-go-to-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/10/energy-monitoring-companies-go-to-battle/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Brundell</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/10/energy-monitoring-companies-go-to-battle/#comment-113418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Brundell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34803#comment-113418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without knowning the specifics of the patents Honeywell is claiming infringement on, it certainly sounds like a stretch to claim that &quot;power sipping&quot; and remote control are violations. After all, most programmable thermostats are equipped with batteries for preserving scheduling but most use the 12V DC power that is one of the 5 standard HVAC thermostat wires. Perhaps not all of the recharge their batteries but that sounds like an obvious innovation. Likewise, to claim that remote control is a violation is going to spread the infringement net so wide that Honeywell is apparently attempting to corner the entire Smart Energy market. I guess Radio Thermostat, Ecobee, Digi, Sony and probably 50 other companies should close close up shop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without knowning the specifics of the patents Honeywell is claiming infringement on, it certainly sounds like a stretch to claim that &#8220;power sipping&#8221; and remote control are violations. After all, most programmable thermostats are equipped with batteries for preserving scheduling but most use the 12V DC power that is one of the 5 standard HVAC thermostat wires. Perhaps not all of the recharge their batteries but that sounds like an obvious innovation. Likewise, to claim that remote control is a violation is going to spread the infringement net so wide that Honeywell is apparently attempting to corner the entire Smart Energy market. I guess Radio Thermostat, Ecobee, Digi, Sony and probably 50 other companies should close close up shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivor O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/10/energy-monitoring-companies-go-to-battle/#comment-113227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivor O'Connor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34803#comment-113227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many products are prompted via normal questions. And many products leach electricity. Honeywell may have some valid patents but they should mention them. Not bogus ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many products are prompted via normal questions. And many products leach electricity. Honeywell may have some valid patents but they should mention them. Not bogus ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
