<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turbulent Air Reduces Wind Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/28/turbulent-air-reduces-wind-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/28/turbulent-air-reduces-wind-energy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Hoenikker</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/28/turbulent-air-reduces-wind-energy/#comment-112124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix Hoenikker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34327#comment-112124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are wind assessments not modeling in atmospheric conditions? What about farm operators? ISOs? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are wind assessments not modeling in atmospheric conditions? What about farm operators? ISOs? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
