Comments on: Maryland Offshore Wind Farm Proposal Could Catch A Second Wind in 2012

By: Marcacci Communications

Marcacci Communications — Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:51:32 +0000

[…] previous years, offshore wind legislation was killed by concerns about impacts on consumer utility bills, but the 2013 legislation contained […]

By: Top Software Company

Top Software Company — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:47:00 +0000

It was really great reading it…

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:25:00 +0000

Exactly.

Those all-too-often-neglected health costs.

By: Tippytom18

Tippytom18 — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:17:00 +0000

think of all the local jobs! I’m so excited for this wind bill…plus it will save billions of dollars of healthcare used to treat people affected by coal pollution. As a student its really important that this bill makes it through!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:31:00 +0000

“… one 100-turbine, 450-megawatt (MW) project, and would represent 1,800 temporary construction jobs and 360 permanent maintenance jobs.”

Seems like an implausibly poor use of manpower. That’s the equivalent of three guys working full time on each turbine!