<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Record CO2 Reduction in US Cap &amp; Trade States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/24/record-co2-reduction-in-us-cap-trade-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/24/record-co2-reduction-in-us-cap-trade-states/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/24/record-co2-reduction-in-us-cap-trade-states/#comment-122452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34226#comment-122452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, a tax (price mechanism) will do the same as a cap (quantity mechanism) theoretically—and your statement that a low tax may not deter rich consumers is true for cap-n-trade if the cap is too lax.  Profitable firms will just purchase cheap excess permits and continue to produce at high levels, where on the other hand if a tax higher than the trading permit price existed and was lower than marginal production costs, the tax would achieve better reduction levels.  It&#039;s sort of a silly way to denigrate a tax mechanism merely because the RGGI cap system has worked.  They are equally effective if done right so why perpetuate unnecessary biases.

The rich may not have &quot;limits&quot; as you suggest, but in aggregate a price necessarily has a corresponding quantity &quot;cap&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a tax (price mechanism) will do the same as a cap (quantity mechanism) theoretically—and your statement that a low tax may not deter rich consumers is true for cap-n-trade if the cap is too lax.  Profitable firms will just purchase cheap excess permits and continue to produce at high levels, where on the other hand if a tax higher than the trading permit price existed and was lower than marginal production costs, the tax would achieve better reduction levels.  It&#8217;s sort of a silly way to denigrate a tax mechanism merely because the RGGI cap system has worked.  They are equally effective if done right so why perpetuate unnecessary biases.</p>
<p>The rich may not have &#8220;limits&#8221; as you suggest, but in aggregate a price necessarily has a corresponding quantity &#8220;cap&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mexico Finalizes Climate Bill to Cap Carbon &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/24/record-co2-reduction-in-us-cap-trade-states/#comment-112559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mexico Finalizes Climate Bill to Cap Carbon &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=34226#comment-112559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have covered some of the details here in: Record CO2 Reduction in Cap &amp; trade States, EU on Track to Meet or Exceed Original Kyoto Targets, and Five Good Things Cap &amp; Trade Has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have covered some of the details here in: Record CO2 Reduction in Cap &amp; trade States, EU on Track to Meet or Exceed Original Kyoto Targets, and Five Good Things Cap &amp; Trade Has [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
