<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Short Tale &amp; “The Long Tailpipe”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%E2%80%9Cthe-long-tailpipe%E2%80%9D/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%e2%80%9cthe-long-tailpipe%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Study: EV More Polluting than Petrol??! Not So Fast&#8230; - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%e2%80%9cthe-long-tailpipe%e2%80%9d/#comment-113634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Study: EV More Polluting than Petrol??! Not So Fast&#8230; - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33892#comment-113634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to those places where coal is a very large percentage of the electrical energy mix. The US national electrical energy mix for coal is now around 43%. The other nations of the world that have an energy mix that relies so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to those places where coal is a very large percentage of the electrical energy mix. The US national electrical energy mix for coal is now around 43%. The other nations of the world that have an energy mix that relies so [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%e2%80%9cthe-long-tailpipe%e2%80%9d/#comment-111485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33892#comment-111485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice one :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%e2%80%9cthe-long-tailpipe%e2%80%9d/#comment-111408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33892#comment-111408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;These basic energy calculations do not consider the vast amounts of electricity that are presently used by refineries to make the fuel that goes into petrol cars.&quot;

I&#039;d like to see a thorough study of this issue.  Your link covers some of the energy that goes into refining gas, but there&#039;s also a lot of energy that goes into extraction and distribution.

It well may be that the energy needed to bring a gallon of gas to ones fuel tank would actually drive an EV further than the gallon of gas will drive an ICEV.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These basic energy calculations do not consider the vast amounts of electricity that are presently used by refineries to make the fuel that goes into petrol cars.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see a thorough study of this issue.  Your link covers some of the energy that goes into refining gas, but there&#8217;s also a lot of energy that goes into extraction and distribution.</p>
<p>It well may be that the energy needed to bring a gallon of gas to ones fuel tank would actually drive an EV further than the gallon of gas will drive an ICEV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%e2%80%9cthe-long-tailpipe%e2%80%9d/#comment-111381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33892#comment-111381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great read!  I agree that the marketing ploy of conflating EV&#039;s and power plant pollution is a good way to stop the discussion.  I&#039;ve noticed that it is used often and can sometimes distract people from dicussing the comparison of EV&#039;s vs. internal combustion vehicles.  My response to the long tailpipe is this; &quot;how do you confuse a car with a power plant?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read!  I agree that the marketing ploy of conflating EV&#8217;s and power plant pollution is a good way to stop the discussion.  I&#8217;ve noticed that it is used often and can sometimes distract people from dicussing the comparison of EV&#8217;s vs. internal combustion vehicles.  My response to the long tailpipe is this; &#8220;how do you confuse a car with a power plant?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jburt56</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/16/a-short-tale-%e2%80%9cthe-long-tailpipe%e2%80%9d/#comment-111377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jburt56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33892#comment-111377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The calculations may not include the embodied energy of replacement parts.  Electric cars have a greater mean time between failure of components (MTBF).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The calculations may not include the embodied energy of replacement parts.  Electric cars have a greater mean time between failure of components (MTBF).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
