<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar is an Asset, Not a Cost &#8212; Why Focus on Grid Parity? (Reader Comment)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/13/solar-is-an-asset-not-a-cost-why-focus-on-grid-parity-reader-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/13/solar-is-an-asset-not-a-cost-why-focus-on-grid-parity-reader-comment/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberlyvdavis1</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/13/solar-is-an-asset-not-a-cost-why-focus-on-grid-parity-reader-comment/#comment-111346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimberlyvdavis1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33843#comment-111346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YESSSSSSSS! I never see an amortized period of paying down the capital cost of a solar system when comparing $/kWh, or watt, to conventional.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YESSSSSSSS! I never see an amortized period of paying down the capital cost of a solar system when comparing $/kWh, or watt, to conventional&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/13/solar-is-an-asset-not-a-cost-why-focus-on-grid-parity-reader-comment/#comment-111308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33843#comment-111308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When they lower the cost another 50% my roof is covered with them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they lower the cost another 50% my roof is covered with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don W Mayfield</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/13/solar-is-an-asset-not-a-cost-why-focus-on-grid-parity-reader-comment/#comment-111252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don W Mayfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33843#comment-111252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also note that solar is nuclear without the expense and danger of a nuclear plant, since the Sun is 93,000,000 miles away.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also note that solar is nuclear without the expense and danger of a nuclear plant, since the Sun is 93,000,000 miles away.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/13/solar-is-an-asset-not-a-cost-why-focus-on-grid-parity-reader-comment/#comment-111234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikhail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33843#comment-111234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another issue with a grid parity statement is that it only has two states: renewables reached the parity or they did not. The grid parity does not necessarily show how far the solar or wind power are in the money. 

Dandelion Renewables customers often ask us about an alternative measure, so called simple payback. The strength of this measure is in the simplicity, but it  does not recognize the time value of the money spent on future inverter replacements, maintenance costs for wind, insurances and solar module degradation. 

Solar and wind projects can be treated as investments with revenues calculated as avoided utility costs. Representing the projects from this angle allows to estimate Return On Investment (ROI). As any other project measure, the ROI is very dependent on input assumptions, such as grid price projections, project life and others. When the customer is clear about the ROI assumptions, he/she can compare the investment in the own power generation with any other alternative investments in socks, mutual funds, bonds, etc. 

That is where a question about how risky is each of the investments comes into play. Unlike most investments on the market, investments in renewables and especially in solar power typically reduce your overall household portfolio risk by hedging away the risk to future commodity price swings.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another issue with a grid parity statement is that it only has two states: renewables reached the parity or they did not. The grid parity does not necessarily show how far the solar or wind power are in the money. </p>
<p>Dandelion Renewables customers often ask us about an alternative measure, so called simple payback. The strength of this measure is in the simplicity, but it  does not recognize the time value of the money spent on future inverter replacements, maintenance costs for wind, insurances and solar module degradation. </p>
<p>Solar and wind projects can be treated as investments with revenues calculated as avoided utility costs. Representing the projects from this angle allows to estimate Return On Investment (ROI). As any other project measure, the ROI is very dependent on input assumptions, such as grid price projections, project life and others. When the customer is clear about the ROI assumptions, he/she can compare the investment in the own power generation with any other alternative investments in socks, mutual funds, bonds, etc. </p>
<p>That is where a question about how risky is each of the investments comes into play. Unlike most investments on the market, investments in renewables and especially in solar power typically reduce your overall household portfolio risk by hedging away the risk to future commodity price swings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
