<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011: The Year Renewables Overtook Nuclear in the US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/09/2011-the-year-renewables-overtook-nuclear-in-the-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/09/2011-the-year-renewables-overtook-nuclear-in-the-us/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/09/2011-the-year-renewables-overtook-nuclear-in-the-us/#comment-110956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33675#comment-110956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Odd mix-up. Corrected. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd mix-up. Corrected. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/09/2011-the-year-renewables-overtook-nuclear-in-the-us/#comment-110920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33675#comment-110920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; [EIA figures] showed that renewable sources were providing around 12% of the US’ energy production. Nuclear was only providing 2%. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
Hmm? From the linked article:
&lt;blockquote&gt; In the first three months of 2011, the country’s biomass/biofuel, hydropower, wind, geothermal, and solar energy generation plants produced a combined 2.245 quadrillion Btus of energy or 11.73 percent of U.S. energy production. During the same period, nuclear energy plants produced 2.125 quadrillion Btus. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 2.125/2.245 * 11.73% = 11.10%]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> [EIA figures] showed that renewable sources were providing around 12% of the US’ energy production. Nuclear was only providing 2%. </p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm? From the linked article:</p>
<blockquote><p> In the first three months of 2011, the country’s biomass/biofuel, hydropower, wind, geothermal, and solar energy generation plants produced a combined 2.245 quadrillion Btus of energy or 11.73 percent of U.S. energy production. During the same period, nuclear energy plants produced 2.125 quadrillion Btus. </p></blockquote>
<p> 2.125/2.245 * 11.73% = 11.10%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geothermal Resources Council</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/09/2011-the-year-renewables-overtook-nuclear-in-the-us/#comment-110919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geothermal Resources Council]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33675#comment-110919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rav: Nice article but please don&#039;t diminish the contribution of geothermal:

&quot;All in all, hydropower accounts for 4.35% of US energy supply. Next comes biomass at 3.15%,.... Solar? just 0.15%, half as much as geothermal energy.&quot;

Geothermal contributed 0.29% of US energy in 2011 and is a constant source of energy, available 24/7, unaffected by calm winds, drought and other environmental factors. Also, it comes from an inexhaustible source. Let&#039;s give geothermal power the attention it deserves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rav: Nice article but please don&#8217;t diminish the contribution of geothermal:</p>
<p>&#8220;All in all, hydropower accounts for 4.35% of US energy supply. Next comes biomass at 3.15%,&#8230;. Solar? just 0.15%, half as much as geothermal energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Geothermal contributed 0.29% of US energy in 2011 and is a constant source of energy, available 24/7, unaffected by calm winds, drought and other environmental factors. Also, it comes from an inexhaustible source. Let&#8217;s give geothermal power the attention it deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommi Henriksen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/09/2011-the-year-renewables-overtook-nuclear-in-the-us/#comment-110882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommi Henriksen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33675#comment-110882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beware the thought that hydro power is, by definition, clean and safe. Reservoir seismicity MAY prove to be a great hazard (The jury is still out)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware the thought that hydro power is, by definition, clean and safe. Reservoir seismicity MAY prove to be a great hazard (The jury is still out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
