<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Airlines: We &#8220;Will Not Cooperate&#8221; with EU Air Traffic Carbon Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/06/chinese-airlines-we-will-not-cooperate-with-eu-air-traffic-carbon-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/06/chinese-airlines-we-will-not-cooperate-with-eu-air-traffic-carbon-tax/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Much Ado About Nothing? Report Suggests Airlines Might Profit from EU Carbon Levy - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/06/chinese-airlines-we-will-not-cooperate-with-eu-air-traffic-carbon-tax/#comment-134432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Much Ado About Nothing? Report Suggests Airlines Might Profit from EU Carbon Levy - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33613#comment-134432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] based airlines, was illegal because it infringed the sovereignty of non-EU states. (They lost.) China&#8217;s airlines have gone further, saying that they&#8217;re simply not going to pay, raising the prospect of a legal stand-off that could see them barred from EU [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] based airlines, was illegal because it infringed the sovereignty of non-EU states. (They lost.) China&#8217;s airlines have gone further, saying that they&#8217;re simply not going to pay, raising the prospect of a legal stand-off that could see them barred from EU [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/06/chinese-airlines-we-will-not-cooperate-with-eu-air-traffic-carbon-tax/#comment-110832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33613#comment-110832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Major Chinese airlines such as China Eastern and Air China are in poor financial condition and have relatively few EU flights so it&#039;s not surprising they are joining American Airlines in fighting this. 

It remains to be seen if they are willing to give up landing rights over this dispute - I rather doubt it and think they will buckle under once the EU rules against them.

Are ANY airlines really green? Some, I&#039;ll grant you, are better at greenwashing than others but the industry is a major polluter and that won&#039;t change soon to carbon taxation is clearly the only way forward in the near term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major Chinese airlines such as China Eastern and Air China are in poor financial condition and have relatively few EU flights so it&#8217;s not surprising they are joining American Airlines in fighting this. </p>
<p>It remains to be seen if they are willing to give up landing rights over this dispute &#8211; I rather doubt it and think they will buckle under once the EU rules against them.</p>
<p>Are ANY airlines really green? Some, I&#8217;ll grant you, are better at greenwashing than others but the industry is a major polluter and that won&#8217;t change soon to carbon taxation is clearly the only way forward in the near term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/01/06/chinese-airlines-we-will-not-cooperate-with-eu-air-traffic-carbon-tax/#comment-110820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33613#comment-110820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They don&#039;t have to pay but then they shouldn&#039;t be allowed to land - and those goes for anyone else who wants to be exempt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t have to pay but then they shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to land &#8211; and those goes for anyone else who wants to be exempt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
