<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semprius to Produce Dot-Sized, Low Cost-High Efficiency Solar CPV Cells, Modules at NC Plant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 03:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/#comment-136973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33035#comment-136973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s my take on storage.


1) We don&#039;t need it (except for wind firming) for several years.  We&#039;ve got a lot of dispatchable supply that can be used for fill-in.


2) Worst case, we could install lots of pump-up hydro.  We have thousands of existing dams that could be used.  I doubt we&#039;ll go to pump-up because there are almost certainly going to be cheaper solutions.


3) There are multiple US &quot;better coming&quot; battery technologies in the works.


The most promising, IMO, is Ambri&#039;s liquid metal battery.  It&#039;s working at the prototype level and should be very cheap.


The first to come on line apparently will be Aquion&#039;s sodium-ion battery.  They should start manufacturing this year.  Their battery should be very affordable, just not as cheap as Ambri&#039;s.


Other interesting technologies such as zinc-air, lithium-air and redox-flow approaches are also possibilities.


Of course we have no idea what China might be developing.  We tend to sell China short, I&#039;m afraid, but should remember that China has major battery companies and lots of well-trained engineers and scientists.  


And there are other non-battery approaches being studied.  One interesting one is to store energy as heat in large well-insulated containers of gravel and to move the heat between containers using argon gas and heat pumps.


It&#039;s early in the storage game.  Way too early to pick winner.



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my take on storage.</p>
<p>1) We don&#8217;t need it (except for wind firming) for several years.  We&#8217;ve got a lot of dispatchable supply that can be used for fill-in.</p>
<p>2) Worst case, we could install lots of pump-up hydro.  We have thousands of existing dams that could be used.  I doubt we&#8217;ll go to pump-up because there are almost certainly going to be cheaper solutions.</p>
<p>3) There are multiple US &#8220;better coming&#8221; battery technologies in the works.</p>
<p>The most promising, IMO, is Ambri&#8217;s liquid metal battery.  It&#8217;s working at the prototype level and should be very cheap.</p>
<p>The first to come on line apparently will be Aquion&#8217;s sodium-ion battery.  They should start manufacturing this year.  Their battery should be very affordable, just not as cheap as Ambri&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Other interesting technologies such as zinc-air, lithium-air and redox-flow approaches are also possibilities.</p>
<p>Of course we have no idea what China might be developing.  We tend to sell China short, I&#8217;m afraid, but should remember that China has major battery companies and lots of well-trained engineers and scientists.  </p>
<p>And there are other non-battery approaches being studied.  One interesting one is to store energy as heat in large well-insulated containers of gravel and to move the heat between containers using argon gas and heat pumps.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s early in the storage game.  Way too early to pick winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Miller</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/#comment-136957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33035#comment-136957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coal Oil and enriched uranium reactors (plus their waste disposal costs) Challenged! Will further electric storage schemes even surpass the &#039;old School&quot; logic? Can molten salts be used?Something better coming? From China?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal Oil and enriched uranium reactors (plus their waste disposal costs) Challenged! Will further electric storage schemes even surpass the &#8216;old School&#8221; logic? Can molten salts be used?Something better coming? From China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advanced Solar CPV Manufacturing Plant to Open in NC this Month - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/#comment-132660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Advanced Solar CPV Manufacturing Plant to Open in NC this Month - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33035#comment-132660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] “SunShot Incubator” program, refining and proving its technology with NREL in Golden. NREL validated Semprius&#8217; tiny, dot-sized CPV cells as having an energy conversion efficiency of 41% at a concentration of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] “SunShot Incubator” program, refining and proving its technology with NREL in Golden. NREL validated Semprius&#8217; tiny, dot-sized CPV cells as having an energy conversion efficiency of 41% at a concentration of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Solar Module Efficiency Record.. &#38; These Modules Are Coming to Market &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/#comment-112358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Solar Module Efficiency Record.. &#38; These Modules Are Coming to Market &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33035#comment-112358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (Yep, we&#8217;ve covered Semprius a few times in the past [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (Yep, we&#8217;ve covered Semprius a few times in the past [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/#comment-109532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33035#comment-109532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manufacturing facility -- the capacity is in reference to how many cells/modules it will be able to produce (5 MW worth,.. eventually 35 MW worth)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manufacturing facility &#8212; the capacity is in reference to how many cells/modules it will be able to produce (5 MW worth,.. eventually 35 MW worth)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LE</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/16/semprius-to-produce-dot-sized-low-cost-high-efficiency-solar-cpv-cells-modules-at-nc-plant/#comment-109484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=33035#comment-109484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: &quot;Semprius to Produce Dot-Sized, Low Cost-High Efficiency Solar CPV Cells, Modules at NC Plant&quot;;  AND/OR:
&quot;... Semprius’ manufacturing plant in Henderson, NC... The plant’s due... with an initial capacity of 5 megawatts (MW), expanding to 35 MW over time.&quot;

Is the NC-Henderson building a &#039;CPV-module manufacturing-facility/&#039; AND/OR  a &#039;solar-energy plant&#039; to produce/distribute power???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;Semprius to Produce Dot-Sized, Low Cost-High Efficiency Solar CPV Cells, Modules at NC Plant&#8221;;  AND/OR:<br />
&#8220;&#8230; Semprius’ manufacturing plant in Henderson, NC&#8230; The plant’s due&#8230; with an initial capacity of 5 megawatts (MW), expanding to 35 MW over time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is the NC-Henderson building a &#8216;CPV-module manufacturing-facility/&#8217; AND/OR  a &#8216;solar-energy plant&#8217; to produce/distribute power???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
