<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upwind Study: 20 MW Wind Turbines are on the Horizon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BasM</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/#comment-212806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BasM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32770#comment-212806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The (energy of the) wind is taken away by the rotor upwind, so the contribution of the downwind rotor will be small (my rough estimation ~50%)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The (energy of the) wind is taken away by the rotor upwind, so the contribution of the downwind rotor will be small (my rough estimation ~50%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie Brady</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/#comment-204365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie Brady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32770#comment-204365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So badly written- was this an 11 year-old&#039;s homework?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So badly written- was this an 11 year-old&#8217;s homework?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eltorovive</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/#comment-108960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eltorovive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32770#comment-108960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s what I thought too but there is a US company that makes 2-bladed, downwind turbines.  Less stress with two blades and a simple wind directed nacelle plus easy to install.
There is also is a floating version like this the Norwegians are already testing.
So again, double up the turbines onto one nacelle base with contra-rotating blades to cancel torque.  Maybe the downwind side of the nacelle is stretched away from the tower and the upwind turbine gets the usual 3 blades.  
That would look cool...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I thought too but there is a US company that makes 2-bladed, downwind turbines.  Less stress with two blades and a simple wind directed nacelle plus easy to install.<br />
There is also is a floating version like this the Norwegians are already testing.<br />
So again, double up the turbines onto one nacelle base with contra-rotating blades to cancel torque.  Maybe the downwind side of the nacelle is stretched away from the tower and the upwind turbine gets the usual 3 blades.<br />
That would look cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Heimel</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/#comment-108956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliott Heimel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32770#comment-108956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if these gigantic Wind Turbines incorporate the Japanese &quot;WindLens&quot; Turbine Designs with the Inward Curving Ring around the Perimeter of the Turbine Blades to Increase the Focus of Airflow Speed through the Blade Zone by 2 to 3 Times. As a Bonus covering the outer blades with a Lens Shroud reduces the dreaded noise pollution.. http://energyreviewsinfo.com -- Thanks for allowing me to review your Article and make a comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if these gigantic Wind Turbines incorporate the Japanese &#8220;WindLens&#8221; Turbine Designs with the Inward Curving Ring around the Perimeter of the Turbine Blades to Increase the Focus of Airflow Speed through the Blade Zone by 2 to 3 Times. As a Bonus covering the outer blades with a Lens Shroud reduces the dreaded noise pollution.. <a href="http://energyreviewsinfo.com" rel="nofollow">http://energyreviewsinfo.com</a> &#8212; Thanks for allowing me to review your Article and make a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/#comment-108899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32770#comment-108899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a problem with a prop behind the tower.  The blades travel through a wind shadow caused by the tower and put strain on the system.  That blade goes quickly from being fully loaded with wind, to no wind, and back to heavy wind.  Lots of system stress on blades and bearings.

Some of the early turbine designs used aft-positioned blades and it wasn&#039;t a good idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a problem with a prop behind the tower.  The blades travel through a wind shadow caused by the tower and put strain on the system.  That blade goes quickly from being fully loaded with wind, to no wind, and back to heavy wind.  Lots of system stress on blades and bearings.</p>
<p>Some of the early turbine designs used aft-positioned blades and it wasn&#8217;t a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eltorovive</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/upwind-study-20-mw-wind-turbines-are-on-the-horizon/#comment-108889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eltorovive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32770#comment-108889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not install a turbine upwind AND downwind on the same nacelle?  This would make a 7mw almost into a 14mw wind turbine.
Foundations (pile driven or floating) are a huge cost offshore.  Take advantage and double the turbine power on one base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not install a turbine upwind AND downwind on the same nacelle?  This would make a 7mw almost into a 14mw wind turbine.<br />
Foundations (pile driven or floating) are a huge cost offshore.  Take advantage and double the turbine power on one base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
