<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tougher and Lighter Wind Turbine Blade Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hélice mais leve e resistente pode revolucionar a geração eólica &#124; @eco4planet</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/#comment-110082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hélice mais leve e resistente pode revolucionar a geração eólica &#124; @eco4planet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32841#comment-110082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] TechTudo via CleanTechnica &#124;&#124;  valeu @LMTransportes            linkwithin_text=&#039;&#160;&#039;  Por Juan Lourenço em 27.12.2011 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] TechTudo via CleanTechnica ||  valeu @LMTransportes            linkwithin_text=&#039;&nbsp;&#039;  Por Juan Lourenço em 27.12.2011 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adidas jeremy scott</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/#comment-109030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adidas jeremy scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32841#comment-109030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/#comment-108972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32841#comment-108972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;However, the weight of the blades impedes that by holding them back.
It is almost as if there is a force pulling back on the blades, ...&quot;

The weight of blades on one side are being pulled backward, but the blades on the other side are being pulled forward. The force putting drag on the rotor is the generator. 

&quot;This is why vehicles burn additional fuel to accelerate, and also to braking. ...&quot;

What vehicles burn fuel to brake? Cars, trucks, trains, etc. dump their kinetic energy into heating their brake pads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, the weight of the blades impedes that by holding them back.<br />
It is almost as if there is a force pulling back on the blades, &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The weight of blades on one side are being pulled backward, but the blades on the other side are being pulled forward. The force putting drag on the rotor is the generator. </p>
<p>&#8220;This is why vehicles burn additional fuel to accelerate, and also to braking. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What vehicles burn fuel to brake? Cars, trucks, trains, etc. dump their kinetic energy into heating their brake pads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/#comment-108971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32841#comment-108971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I&#039;d use Hexmesh or something of the sort paired with the Polyurethane... much much smarter/affordable.. But dont mind me, I&#039;m just the degreeless guy constantly correcting science articles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;d use Hexmesh or something of the sort paired with the Polyurethane&#8230; much much smarter/affordable.. But dont mind me, I&#8217;m just the degreeless guy constantly correcting science articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/09/a-tougher-and-lighter-wind-turbine-blade-design/#comment-108970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32841#comment-108970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I think carbon nanotubes, I think affordable :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I think carbon nanotubes, I think affordable <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
