<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevy Volt Gets Highest Satisfaction Rating in Consumer Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy Chevy Volt Drivers (Videos) - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-125190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Happy Chevy Volt Drivers (Videos) - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-125190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has put out a handful of videos of users discussing the Volt (in a good way, of course). The Volt had the highest satisfaction rating in Consumer Reports of any car in the most recent ratings, so Chevy is happy to tout its owners&#8217;&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has put out a handful of videos of users discussing the Volt (in a good way, of course). The Volt had the highest satisfaction rating in Consumer Reports of any car in the most recent ratings, so Chevy is happy to tout its owners&#8217;&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-110508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-110508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks -- correcting that right now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8212; correcting that right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nehemiah Spencer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-110490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nehemiah Spencer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-110490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your article. I&#039;d like to clarify a major error in your article. There have been around 3 dozen total people who have contacted GM regarding a vehicle loaner while the Volt is investigated. Not 33%. Major difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your article. I&#8217;d like to clarify a major error in your article. There have been around 3 dozen total people who have contacted GM regarding a vehicle loaner while the Volt is investigated. Not 33%. Major difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-109025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-109025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so stealing this....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so stealing this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-109024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-109024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a little bump of new coal plants coming on line.  They were started many years ago.  Like nuclear, it takes a long time to build a new coal plant.  As far as I know we  have permitted only one new coal plant in the last two plus years.  And we&#039;ve scheduled a large number of coal plants for early closure.

We average about 800 gasoline car fires per day in the US.  Anytime you store a lot of energy in a small place you&#039;ve got potential problems, be it gas, electricity, flywheels, springs, or steam.  Batteries should work out to be a lot safer than gasoline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a little bump of new coal plants coming on line.  They were started many years ago.  Like nuclear, it takes a long time to build a new coal plant.  As far as I know we  have permitted only one new coal plant in the last two plus years.  And we&#8217;ve scheduled a large number of coal plants for early closure.</p>
<p>We average about 800 gasoline car fires per day in the US.  Anytime you store a lot of energy in a small place you&#8217;ve got potential problems, be it gas, electricity, flywheels, springs, or steam.  Batteries should work out to be a lot safer than gasoline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-109023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-109023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@brenro

One more thing:  The concept of a lithium shortage or dependency on lithium from one part of the world, e.g. Chile, has been argued down numerous times.  There is plenty of lithium available.

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2011/08/lithium-20110803.html   - August 2011
“University of Michigan and Ford researchers see plentiful lithium resources for electric vehicles”  - August 2011

http://www.pv-tech.org/news/solarworld_goes_from_modules_to_mining  “SolarWorld goes from modules to mining” - March 2011
“The Saxony-located lithium deposits were claimed to be among the ten largest lithium deposits in the world.”

http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=23518  “Afghanistan Could Be &#039;Saudi Arabia&#039; of Lithium” - June 2010

http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Lithium+mine+will+help+power+revolution/2260866/story.html   - November 2009
“Quebec lithium mine will help power electric-car revolution”          “Quebec will have a mine north of Val d&#039;Or on stream in 2011 and Australia&#039;s Talison Lithium, the world&#039;s biggest single producer, is coming with an initial public share offering in Canada and at home.”

http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=21825  “Is There Enough Lithium for Electric Car Boom? Most Experts Say Yes” - September 2009
“SYNOPSIS: Between new lithium resources and recycling, proponents see enough lithium for electric car batteries into the foreseeable future.”

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Rodinia-Minerals-Inc-TSX-VENTURE-RM-1037656.html   - August 2009
“Rodinia Minerals Inc.: Clayton Valley Lithium Project Drilling Update”

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/01/outlook-lithium.html  “Outlook: Lithium Industry Will Be Pushed into Oversupply through 2013” - January 2009

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/geothermal-power-lithium-mining-two-in-one-in-california   - September 2009
“Geothermal Power, Lithium Mining Two-in-One in California”
“Geothermal power plants can extract lithium from underground brine and sell it to battery makers. One geothermal project is turning to startup Simbol Mining to try it out.”          “Generate geothermal power, and extract enough lithium from the briny water those plants emit to match a quarter of the world&#039;s supply of the metal.”
http://www.news.com/8301-11128_3-9881869-54.html  Simbol Mining - “ Mining lithium from geothermal &#039;lemonade&#039; ” – February 2008
“The start-up eventually aims to mine more than 100,000 tons of lithium carbonate each year from geothermal sources. That&#039;s more than the current annual market for the compound; the company expects demands for it to quintuple by 2013.“

http://www.evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1434  “Lithium in Abundance” – April 2008
“Evans pointed out that a single geothermal well in southern California can produce enough lithium to meet all of the world&#039;s current demand for lithium.”          “There are also lithium-bearing clays called Hectorite and oilfield brines that contain commercially-viable concentrations of lithium, though they would be more expensive to produce”          “He estimates it at 28.4 million tonnes of lithium, which is equivalent to 150 million tonnes of lithium carbonate. Current world demand is 16,000 tonnes.”
“His conclusion is that &quot;concerns regarding lithium availability for hybrid or electric vehicle batteries or other foreseeable applications are unfounded.&quot; 
http://www.worldlithium.com/Home_files/An%20Abundance%20of%20Lithium.pdf  “AN ABUNDANCE OF LITHIUM” by R. Keith Evans – March 2008

LOTS OF LITHIUM IS AVAILABLE DUDE!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brenro</p>
<p>One more thing:  The concept of a lithium shortage or dependency on lithium from one part of the world, e.g. Chile, has been argued down numerous times.  There is plenty of lithium available.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2011/08/lithium-20110803.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2011/08/lithium-20110803.html</a>   &#8211; August 2011<br />
“University of Michigan and Ford researchers see plentiful lithium resources for electric vehicles”  &#8211; August 2011</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pv-tech.org/news/solarworld_goes_from_modules_to_mining" rel="nofollow">http://www.pv-tech.org/news/solarworld_goes_from_modules_to_mining</a>  “SolarWorld goes from modules to mining” &#8211; March 2011<br />
“The Saxony-located lithium deposits were claimed to be among the ten largest lithium deposits in the world.”</p>
<p><a href="http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=23518" rel="nofollow">http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=23518</a>  “Afghanistan Could Be &#8216;Saudi Arabia&#8217; of Lithium” &#8211; June 2010</p>
<p><a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Lithium+mine+will+help+power+revolution/2260866/story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Lithium+mine+will+help+power+revolution/2260866/story.html</a>   &#8211; November 2009<br />
“Quebec lithium mine will help power electric-car revolution”          “Quebec will have a mine north of Val d&#8217;Or on stream in 2011 and Australia&#8217;s Talison Lithium, the world&#8217;s biggest single producer, is coming with an initial public share offering in Canada and at home.”</p>
<p><a href="http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=21825" rel="nofollow">http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=21825</a>  “Is There Enough Lithium for Electric Car Boom? Most Experts Say Yes” &#8211; September 2009<br />
“SYNOPSIS: Between new lithium resources and recycling, proponents see enough lithium for electric car batteries into the foreseeable future.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Rodinia-Minerals-Inc-TSX-VENTURE-RM-1037656.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Rodinia-Minerals-Inc-TSX-VENTURE-RM-1037656.html</a>   &#8211; August 2009<br />
“Rodinia Minerals Inc.: Clayton Valley Lithium Project Drilling Update”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/01/outlook-lithium.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/01/outlook-lithium.html</a>  “Outlook: Lithium Industry Will Be Pushed into Oversupply through 2013” &#8211; January 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/geothermal-power-lithium-mining-two-in-one-in-california" rel="nofollow">http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/geothermal-power-lithium-mining-two-in-one-in-california</a>   &#8211; September 2009<br />
“Geothermal Power, Lithium Mining Two-in-One in California”<br />
“Geothermal power plants can extract lithium from underground brine and sell it to battery makers. One geothermal project is turning to startup Simbol Mining to try it out.”          “Generate geothermal power, and extract enough lithium from the briny water those plants emit to match a quarter of the world&#8217;s supply of the metal.”<br />
<a href="http://www.news.com/8301-11128_3-9881869-54.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com/8301-11128_3-9881869-54.html</a>  Simbol Mining &#8211; “ Mining lithium from geothermal &#8216;lemonade&#8217; ” – February 2008<br />
“The start-up eventually aims to mine more than 100,000 tons of lithium carbonate each year from geothermal sources. That&#8217;s more than the current annual market for the compound; the company expects demands for it to quintuple by 2013.“</p>
<p><a href="http://www.evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1434" rel="nofollow">http://www.evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1434</a>  “Lithium in Abundance” – April 2008<br />
“Evans pointed out that a single geothermal well in southern California can produce enough lithium to meet all of the world&#8217;s current demand for lithium.”          “There are also lithium-bearing clays called Hectorite and oilfield brines that contain commercially-viable concentrations of lithium, though they would be more expensive to produce”          “He estimates it at 28.4 million tonnes of lithium, which is equivalent to 150 million tonnes of lithium carbonate. Current world demand is 16,000 tonnes.”<br />
“His conclusion is that &#8220;concerns regarding lithium availability for hybrid or electric vehicle batteries or other foreseeable applications are unfounded.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.worldlithium.com/Home_files/An%20Abundance%20of%20Lithium.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldlithium.com/Home_files/An%20Abundance%20of%20Lithium.pdf</a>  “AN ABUNDANCE OF LITHIUM” by R. Keith Evans – March 2008</p>
<p>LOTS OF LITHIUM IS AVAILABLE DUDE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-109022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-109022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@brenro

1. 1970s technology Li-Cobalt batteries with flammible electrolytes can be dangerous.  I don&#039;t think these are used in a single EV/PHEV vehicle.  Newer Li-TiO2, Li-Mn2O4, or Li-FePO4 chemistries with non-flammable electrolytes are considerably safer than the Li-Cobalt batteries still used some in electronics.  The newer Lithium chemistries are far safer than using that flammable volatile fuel we know as gasoline.  Gasoline fires destroy vehicles and take lives every year.  Some models of gasoline cars have been famous for frying the occupants in accidents.  Remember the Pinto?  Sure, anything with a high energy density is also going to have some risk and needs regulation oversight.  This will be true for batteries as much as gasoline.  ...BUT you have to be clueless to think the newer lithium battery chemistries are more dangerous than gasoline.

2. Mr Wallace is far more correct about the CO2 production from ICEV compared to coal powered EVs.  The later are cleaner now and will continue to become more so.  An increasing amount of our oil in the USA comes from the tars sands of Alberta Canada.  This is now the major source of our oil imports.  This means ICEVs burning gasoline are in-fact far more polluting than they were a few years ago (from well to wheels perspective).  Since sweet oil production has peaked, we can expect our oil to come increasingly from more polluting sources.

3. The grid is starting to get cleaner.  The only reason we&#039;re &quot;falling behind China&quot; in building new coal plants is because they&#039;re building lots and we&#039;re building almost none.  In fact, I think we&#039;re decommisioning them faster.  Most agree natural gas is going to take a significant share of power generation from coal over the next few decades.  NG is cleaner than coal.  Combine this with the continuing exponential growth of Wind and Solar.  EVs/PHEVs will be cleaner than ICEVs in short order, if they are not already.

4. I live in Washington state.  We use hydro, NG, and wind for electricity.  Almost no coal.  We already have very clean power for EVs and PHEVs.

5. A surprising number of EV owners in S. Cal. charge their cars using home solar power.  (Several of the large auto manufactures with EVs also offer solar charging stations.)  These people of driving nearly CO2 free.  This trend will only increase becuase the cost of coal is increasing and the cost of solar is dropping.

Try to look past the oily empire dogma.  The energy business is changing.  EVs and PHEVs are important:
A.  To get us off oil, so we can balance our international trade better, balance our national budget better, and bring our troops home from the wars in the Middle East.
B. To reduce CO2 output by using cleaner sources of electricity to power our cars.  By the time there is a significant number of EVs/PHEVs on the road, our grid electricity will include much more NG, wind, and solar ...and much less coal ...it will be far cleaner.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brenro</p>
<p>1. 1970s technology Li-Cobalt batteries with flammible electrolytes can be dangerous.  I don&#8217;t think these are used in a single EV/PHEV vehicle.  Newer Li-TiO2, Li-Mn2O4, or Li-FePO4 chemistries with non-flammable electrolytes are considerably safer than the Li-Cobalt batteries still used some in electronics.  The newer Lithium chemistries are far safer than using that flammable volatile fuel we know as gasoline.  Gasoline fires destroy vehicles and take lives every year.  Some models of gasoline cars have been famous for frying the occupants in accidents.  Remember the Pinto?  Sure, anything with a high energy density is also going to have some risk and needs regulation oversight.  This will be true for batteries as much as gasoline.  &#8230;BUT you have to be clueless to think the newer lithium battery chemistries are more dangerous than gasoline.</p>
<p>2. Mr Wallace is far more correct about the CO2 production from ICEV compared to coal powered EVs.  The later are cleaner now and will continue to become more so.  An increasing amount of our oil in the USA comes from the tars sands of Alberta Canada.  This is now the major source of our oil imports.  This means ICEVs burning gasoline are in-fact far more polluting than they were a few years ago (from well to wheels perspective).  Since sweet oil production has peaked, we can expect our oil to come increasingly from more polluting sources.</p>
<p>3. The grid is starting to get cleaner.  The only reason we&#8217;re &#8220;falling behind China&#8221; in building new coal plants is because they&#8217;re building lots and we&#8217;re building almost none.  In fact, I think we&#8217;re decommisioning them faster.  Most agree natural gas is going to take a significant share of power generation from coal over the next few decades.  NG is cleaner than coal.  Combine this with the continuing exponential growth of Wind and Solar.  EVs/PHEVs will be cleaner than ICEVs in short order, if they are not already.</p>
<p>4. I live in Washington state.  We use hydro, NG, and wind for electricity.  Almost no coal.  We already have very clean power for EVs and PHEVs.</p>
<p>5. A surprising number of EV owners in S. Cal. charge their cars using home solar power.  (Several of the large auto manufactures with EVs also offer solar charging stations.)  These people of driving nearly CO2 free.  This trend will only increase becuase the cost of coal is increasing and the cost of solar is dropping.</p>
<p>Try to look past the oily empire dogma.  The energy business is changing.  EVs and PHEVs are important:<br />
A.  To get us off oil, so we can balance our international trade better, balance our national budget better, and bring our troops home from the wars in the Middle East.<br />
B. To reduce CO2 output by using cleaner sources of electricity to power our cars.  By the time there is a significant number of EVs/PHEVs on the road, our grid electricity will include much more NG, wind, and solar &#8230;and much less coal &#8230;it will be far cleaner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a few closures for you...

&quot;On Jul. 11, Southern Company announced plans to retire two coal- fired units at Plant Branch in Millidgeville, Georgia, as a result of the new CSAP rule. One is scheduled to close in October 2013 and another by December 2013.

Two days later, Dallas-based Energy Future Holdings Corp said it may have to close some of its 12 coal-burning power plants in the state of Texas as a result of the new CSAP rule.

On Jul. 15, Duke Energy Ohio announced it will retire all six coal- fired generation units at its W.C. Beckjord Station, southwest of Cincinnati, Ohio, by Jan. 1, 2015, as a result of the new rule and new proposals.

On Jul. 24, Duke Energy announced it will retire three coal units at the Lee Steam Station in Williamston, South Carolina, in late 2014.&quot;
 http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5326181/u-s-new-clean-air-rules-force-some-coal-plants-to-close 


The 63 year old coal fire power plant in Muskegon is scheduled to close in 2015.


Sept 26 (Reuters) - Regulations being formulated by state
governments and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to cut
air and water pollution and control the handling of coal waste
are expected to force the retirement of 30,000 to 70,000 MW of
coal and other fossil-fired generation, industry studies show.

 The following is a partial list of U.S. coal plants that
energy companies expect to retire in the coming years. Some
units may be converted to burn alternative fuels or be replaced
with natural gas-fired generation.
OWNER        UNIT                SIZE(MW) STATE  DATE TO SHUT
Exelon       Cromby Units 1,2      345    PA     2011
Exelon       Eddystone Units 1,2   588    PA     2011
AEP          Phillip Sporn         450    WV     2011
TVA          Shawnee Unit 10       124    KY     2011
Duke         Cliffside 1-4         198    NC     2011
Duke         Buck 3 and 4          113    NC     2011
Progress     Weatherspoon          172    NC     2011
AES          Greenidge             156    NY     c2011
AES          Westover              128    NY     c2011
TVA          Widows Creek 1-2      282    AL     Late 2011
TVA          John Sevier Unit 1,2  352    TN     2012
Duke         Edwardsport           160    IN     2012
Duke         Dan River 1-3         276    NC     2012
GenOn        Potomac River         482    VA     Oct 2012
Progress     H.F. Lee              397    NC     2013
Black Hills  W.N. Clark             42    CO     By 2013
Progress     Sutton                600    NC     2014
Duke         WS Lee                370    SC     2014
Dominion     Salem Harbor          738    MA     2014
Duke         Wabash River 2-6      668    IN     2014
AEP          Glen Lyn              335    VA     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Kammer                630    WV     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Kanawha River         400    WV     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Phillip Sporn         600    WV     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Picway Plant          100    OH     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Big Sandy 1,2       1,078    KY     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Clinch River 3        235    VA     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Conesville 3          165    OH     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Muskingum River 1-4   840    OH     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Tanners Creek 1-3     495    IN     Dec 31, 2014
AEP          Welsh 2               528    TX     Dec 31, 2014
Dominion     North Branch           74    VA     Late 2015
Duke         Riverbend 4-7         454    NC     2015
Duke         Buck 5-6              256    NC     2015
Dominion     Yorktown 1-2          323    VA     2015
TVA          Widows Creek 3-6      564    AL     Late 2015
TVA          Johnsonville 1-6      794    TN     Late 2015
Dominion     Chesapeake 1-4        595    VA     2015-2016
PPL&#039;s LG&amp;E   Cane Run              563    KY     2016
PPL&#039;s LG&amp;E   Tyrone                 71    KY      ---
PPL&#039;s LG&amp;E   Green River           163    KY     2016
TVA          Johnsonville 7-10     692    TN     Late 2017
Dominion     State Line            515    IN     By mid-2014
Progress     Cape Fear             316    NC     2017
Xcel         Cherokee 1-4        1,069    CO     By 2017
Xcel         Arapahoe 3,4          156    CO     By 2017
Xcel         Valmont               186    CO     By 2017
CPS Energy   Deely                 871    TX     2018
PGE          Boardman              585    OR     2020
Centralia    TransAlta             688    WA     2020
Centralia    TransAtla             688    WA     2025
APS          Four Corners 1-3      560    NM     ---


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/26/utilities-coal-shutdowns-idUSS1E78P0PE20110926



Now give us some data on lithium battery fires in the last year.

The UPS plane, we don&#039;t know how the fire started.  There are
thousands of things which, if ignited, would have brought the plane
down.

And take your &quot; patriotic chest beating&quot; crap and shove it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a few closures for you&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;On Jul. 11, Southern Company announced plans to retire two coal- fired units at Plant Branch in Millidgeville, Georgia, as a result of the new CSAP rule. One is scheduled to close in October 2013 and another by December 2013.</p>
<p>Two days later, Dallas-based Energy Future Holdings Corp said it may have to close some of its 12 coal-burning power plants in the state of Texas as a result of the new CSAP rule.</p>
<p>On Jul. 15, Duke Energy Ohio announced it will retire all six coal- fired generation units at its W.C. Beckjord Station, southwest of Cincinnati, Ohio, by Jan. 1, 2015, as a result of the new rule and new proposals.</p>
<p>On Jul. 24, Duke Energy announced it will retire three coal units at the Lee Steam Station in Williamston, South Carolina, in late 2014.&#8221;<br />
 <a href="http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5326181/u-s-new-clean-air-rules-force-some-coal-plants-to-close" rel="nofollow">http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/5326181/u-s-new-clean-air-rules-force-some-coal-plants-to-close</a> </p>
<p>The 63 year old coal fire power plant in Muskegon is scheduled to close in 2015.</p>
<p>Sept 26 (Reuters) &#8211; Regulations being formulated by state<br />
governments and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to cut<br />
air and water pollution and control the handling of coal waste<br />
are expected to force the retirement of 30,000 to 70,000 MW of<br />
coal and other fossil-fired generation, industry studies show.</p>
<p> The following is a partial list of U.S. coal plants that<br />
energy companies expect to retire in the coming years. Some<br />
units may be converted to burn alternative fuels or be replaced<br />
with natural gas-fired generation.<br />
OWNER        UNIT                SIZE(MW) STATE  DATE TO SHUT<br />
Exelon       Cromby Units 1,2      345    PA     2011<br />
Exelon       Eddystone Units 1,2   588    PA     2011<br />
AEP          Phillip Sporn         450    WV     2011<br />
TVA          Shawnee Unit 10       124    KY     2011<br />
Duke         Cliffside 1-4         198    NC     2011<br />
Duke         Buck 3 and 4          113    NC     2011<br />
Progress     Weatherspoon          172    NC     2011<br />
AES          Greenidge             156    NY     c2011<br />
AES          Westover              128    NY     c2011<br />
TVA          Widows Creek 1-2      282    AL     Late 2011<br />
TVA          John Sevier Unit 1,2  352    TN     2012<br />
Duke         Edwardsport           160    IN     2012<br />
Duke         Dan River 1-3         276    NC     2012<br />
GenOn        Potomac River         482    VA     Oct 2012<br />
Progress     H.F. Lee              397    NC     2013<br />
Black Hills  W.N. Clark             42    CO     By 2013<br />
Progress     Sutton                600    NC     2014<br />
Duke         WS Lee                370    SC     2014<br />
Dominion     Salem Harbor          738    MA     2014<br />
Duke         Wabash River 2-6      668    IN     2014<br />
AEP          Glen Lyn              335    VA     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Kammer                630    WV     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Kanawha River         400    WV     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Phillip Sporn         600    WV     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Picway Plant          100    OH     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Big Sandy 1,2       1,078    KY     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Clinch River 3        235    VA     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Conesville 3          165    OH     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Muskingum River 1-4   840    OH     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Tanners Creek 1-3     495    IN     Dec 31, 2014<br />
AEP          Welsh 2               528    TX     Dec 31, 2014<br />
Dominion     North Branch           74    VA     Late 2015<br />
Duke         Riverbend 4-7         454    NC     2015<br />
Duke         Buck 5-6              256    NC     2015<br />
Dominion     Yorktown 1-2          323    VA     2015<br />
TVA          Widows Creek 3-6      564    AL     Late 2015<br />
TVA          Johnsonville 1-6      794    TN     Late 2015<br />
Dominion     Chesapeake 1-4        595    VA     2015-2016<br />
PPL&#8217;s LG&amp;E   Cane Run              563    KY     2016<br />
PPL&#8217;s LG&amp;E   Tyrone                 71    KY      &#8212;<br />
PPL&#8217;s LG&amp;E   Green River           163    KY     2016<br />
TVA          Johnsonville 7-10     692    TN     Late 2017<br />
Dominion     State Line            515    IN     By mid-2014<br />
Progress     Cape Fear             316    NC     2017<br />
Xcel         Cherokee 1-4        1,069    CO     By 2017<br />
Xcel         Arapahoe 3,4          156    CO     By 2017<br />
Xcel         Valmont               186    CO     By 2017<br />
CPS Energy   Deely                 871    TX     2018<br />
PGE          Boardman              585    OR     2020<br />
Centralia    TransAlta             688    WA     2020<br />
Centralia    TransAtla             688    WA     2025<br />
APS          Four Corners 1-3      560    NM     &#8212;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/26/utilities-coal-shutdowns-idUSS1E78P0PE20110926" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/26/utilities-coal-shutdowns-idUSS1E78P0PE20110926</a></p>
<p>Now give us some data on lithium battery fires in the last year.</p>
<p>The UPS plane, we don&#8217;t know how the fire started.  There are<br />
thousands of things which, if ignited, would have brought the plane<br />
down.</p>
<p>And take your &#8221; patriotic chest beating&#8221; crap and shove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether the fire on that 747 started with batteries or not they are most certainly what brought that aircraft down. They burn at a very high temperature. Laptop batteries, cell phone batteries, do you not watch the news? Not a single one of the 53 coal plants in the US on Forbes Top 200 dirtiest power plants in the world have been taken off the grid. Please save the patriotic chest beating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether the fire on that 747 started with batteries or not they are most certainly what brought that aircraft down. They burn at a very high temperature. Laptop batteries, cell phone batteries, do you not watch the news? Not a single one of the 53 coal plants in the US on Forbes Top 200 dirtiest power plants in the world have been taken off the grid. Please save the patriotic chest beating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of April of this year there is no definitive report that states the cause of the UPS fire due to shipped batteries.  If you know of a firm finding, please post.

It is not true that &quot; Li-ion batteries have already been all over the news for igniting&quot;.  There were a few problems some time back, a search of the web for fires turned up two in the last year.  One was a &quot;barrel of batteries&quot; at a Marine base.  I&#039;m willing to guess that was due to improper disposal.  The other was a fire started by a dog chewing up a child&#039;s toy telephone, the dog&#039;s saliva playing a role in the resulting short.

Lithium ion batteries fly everyday by the millions.  They live in houses and commercial buildings by the billions.  Lithium batteries outnumber automobiles many times over.  If they are a great danger, where&#039;s the news of hundreds of thousands of battery fires this last year?

Balance that against the &gt;300,000 gasoline-auto fires we have a year.

Yes, coal is nasty stuff.  That&#039;s why we are shutting down our coal plants. Coal is now less than 45% of our grid supply and we have a large number of coal plants, the dirtiest, scheduled to close.

We are putting no horse before the cart (unless you work for the people who sell oil).  We are simultaneously greening our grid and putting EVs on the
road.  To argue that we should wait with EVs until coal is off the grid is
to do the work of big oil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of April of this year there is no definitive report that states the cause of the UPS fire due to shipped batteries.  If you know of a firm finding, please post.</p>
<p>It is not true that &#8221; Li-ion batteries have already been all over the news for igniting&#8221;.  There were a few problems some time back, a search of the web for fires turned up two in the last year.  One was a &#8220;barrel of batteries&#8221; at a Marine base.  I&#8217;m willing to guess that was due to improper disposal.  The other was a fire started by a dog chewing up a child&#8217;s toy telephone, the dog&#8217;s saliva playing a role in the resulting short.</p>
<p>Lithium ion batteries fly everyday by the millions.  They live in houses and commercial buildings by the billions.  Lithium batteries outnumber automobiles many times over.  If they are a great danger, where&#8217;s the news of hundreds of thousands of battery fires this last year?</p>
<p>Balance that against the &gt;300,000 gasoline-auto fires we have a year.</p>
<p>Yes, coal is nasty stuff.  That&#8217;s why we are shutting down our coal plants. Coal is now less than 45% of our grid supply and we have a large number of coal plants, the dirtiest, scheduled to close.</p>
<p>We are putting no horse before the cart (unless you work for the people who sell oil).  We are simultaneously greening our grid and putting EVs on the<br />
road.  To argue that we should wait with EVs until coal is off the grid is<br />
to do the work of big oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, I will gladly raise a glass with you on the day the world economy is no longer based on petroleum but your arguments are seriously flawed. Li-ion batteries have already been all over the news for igniting, the most horrific being the UPS cargo plane going down in Abu Dhabi. You need to bone up on coal burning power plants. Carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury, arsenic, lead. No car being driven on American roads spews anywhere near the poisons these power plants produce. We have some of the dirtiest on earth. We&#039;ll probably never know the health hazards they&#039;re responsible for. We&#039;re putting the cart before the horse with electric cars because we live in a capitalist society which in turn controls our government. The utility companies are fighting modernization tooth and nail and you can be sure any expense they incur will show up on your bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I will gladly raise a glass with you on the day the world economy is no longer based on petroleum but your arguments are seriously flawed. Li-ion batteries have already been all over the news for igniting, the most horrific being the UPS cargo plane going down in Abu Dhabi. You need to bone up on coal burning power plants. Carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury, arsenic, lead. No car being driven on American roads spews anywhere near the poisons these power plants produce. We have some of the dirtiest on earth. We&#8217;ll probably never know the health hazards they&#8217;re responsible for. We&#8217;re putting the cart before the horse with electric cars because we live in a capitalist society which in turn controls our government. The utility companies are fighting modernization tooth and nail and you can be sure any expense they incur will show up on your bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Lithium batteries are inherently dangerous and not ready for large applications like automobiles no matter how desperate you are to get us off our petroleum fix&quot;

Gasoline is inherently dangerous as well but we still use it don&#039;t we? Besides Li-ion is used every day in millions if not billions of devices and scaling up to larger applications is typically done with smaller Li-ion cells in series or parallel so there is nothing new or dangerous about it compared to what we already are doing.  The biggest issue with larger Li-ion batteries is individual cell failure.

You argue about coal power but you think its okay to put gas in your car? How many coal disasters have killed massive amounts of wildlife like oil has? At least with coal powering electric cars the pollution is isolated at a single source and can be controlled better than emissions from millions of different vehicles. You have any idea the amount of people driving on the road with failed egr valves, or have completely removed their catalytic converters and other emissions equipment?

The Volt is an American car fueled by American energy, it doesn&#039;t get any better than that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lithium batteries are inherently dangerous and not ready for large applications like automobiles no matter how desperate you are to get us off our petroleum fix&#8221;</p>
<p>Gasoline is inherently dangerous as well but we still use it don&#8217;t we? Besides Li-ion is used every day in millions if not billions of devices and scaling up to larger applications is typically done with smaller Li-ion cells in series or parallel so there is nothing new or dangerous about it compared to what we already are doing.  The biggest issue with larger Li-ion batteries is individual cell failure.</p>
<p>You argue about coal power but you think its okay to put gas in your car? How many coal disasters have killed massive amounts of wildlife like oil has? At least with coal powering electric cars the pollution is isolated at a single source and can be controlled better than emissions from millions of different vehicles. You have any idea the amount of people driving on the road with failed egr valves, or have completely removed their catalytic converters and other emissions equipment?</p>
<p>The Volt is an American car fueled by American energy, it doesn&#8217;t get any better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, you can increase the number of dependents you claim on your withholding and get your rebate each month.  The subsidy starts with your next pay check.

Yes, if you don&#039;t pay much in taxes then you wouldn&#039;t benefit from the rebate, but few people who pay little or no tax are likely to be buying new cars, so I think we can put your tax concerns to rest.

Lithium batteries are not nearly as dangerous as a ruptured gas tank.  I have personal experience with gas leaking after a crash and vehicles going up in flames.  They pulled me out of mine just in time.

The Volt that had its battery catch on fire was hit by a hydraulic ram to simulate a high speed sideways slide into a tree or pole, followed by turning the vehicle over.  Then three weeks later the battery caught on fire.  During 1999 to 2003 the US averaged over 325,000 gasoline vehicle fires per year.

After crashes it is standard practice to drain gas tanks and disconnect batteries before the wrecked vehicle is stored.  With EVs the batteries need to be drained as well.  Plus GM is toughening their battery packs to keep the cooling systems from being ruptured as this one was.

You confuse reserves of lithium with occurrence of lithium.  We&#039;ve got far
more lithium than we need to manufacture EV batteries.  If we somehow ran
out and the rest of the world would not sell us any we could extract it
from sea water and the price of EVs would rise only a few hundred dollars.

You&#039;re using old grid data.  In 2010 we generated 1,847,290 thousand MWhs
of our total 4,127,648 thousand MWhs of electricity with coal.   That is
44.8%.

We&#039;ve essentially quit building coal plants.  We&#039;ve got close to 200 of our
least efficient, dirtiest scheduled for an early shut down.

A $25,000 EV is about the same per month to own and operate as a 40MPG
$20,000 ICEV.  That&#039;s assuming no down payment and five year financing at
4%.  After both cars are paid off at the end of five years the EV is
roughly $100 less per month to operate.  I don&#039;t think people are going to
turn their backs on &quot;pay the same now and a lot less later&quot; EVs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you can increase the number of dependents you claim on your withholding and get your rebate each month.  The subsidy starts with your next pay check.</p>
<p>Yes, if you don&#8217;t pay much in taxes then you wouldn&#8217;t benefit from the rebate, but few people who pay little or no tax are likely to be buying new cars, so I think we can put your tax concerns to rest.</p>
<p>Lithium batteries are not nearly as dangerous as a ruptured gas tank.  I have personal experience with gas leaking after a crash and vehicles going up in flames.  They pulled me out of mine just in time.</p>
<p>The Volt that had its battery catch on fire was hit by a hydraulic ram to simulate a high speed sideways slide into a tree or pole, followed by turning the vehicle over.  Then three weeks later the battery caught on fire.  During 1999 to 2003 the US averaged over 325,000 gasoline vehicle fires per year.</p>
<p>After crashes it is standard practice to drain gas tanks and disconnect batteries before the wrecked vehicle is stored.  With EVs the batteries need to be drained as well.  Plus GM is toughening their battery packs to keep the cooling systems from being ruptured as this one was.</p>
<p>You confuse reserves of lithium with occurrence of lithium.  We&#8217;ve got far<br />
more lithium than we need to manufacture EV batteries.  If we somehow ran<br />
out and the rest of the world would not sell us any we could extract it<br />
from sea water and the price of EVs would rise only a few hundred dollars.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re using old grid data.  In 2010 we generated 1,847,290 thousand MWhs<br />
of our total 4,127,648 thousand MWhs of electricity with coal.   That is<br />
44.8%.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve essentially quit building coal plants.  We&#8217;ve got close to 200 of our<br />
least efficient, dirtiest scheduled for an early shut down.</p>
<p>A $25,000 EV is about the same per month to own and operate as a 40MPG<br />
$20,000 ICEV.  That&#8217;s assuming no down payment and five year financing at<br />
4%.  After both cars are paid off at the end of five years the EV is<br />
roughly $100 less per month to operate.  I don&#8217;t think people are going to<br />
turn their backs on &#8220;pay the same now and a lot less later&#8221; EVs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That subsidy is not instantaneous, it comes at the end of the year when you file your taxes and may or may not actually put any cash in your pocket depending on your tax burden. Lithium batteries are inherently dangerous and not ready for large applications like automobiles no matter how desperate you are to get us off our petroleum fix. The US reserves of lithium are estimated to be 38000 tons which is pretty laughable compared to the 7.5 million in Chile and the 800000 in Argentina which is where it really comes from. The Union of Concerned Scientists pegs coal as 54% of our electric generating source but beyond that we have some of the dirtiest power plants on the globe and we&#039;re even lagging behind China in building cleaner ones. Battery technology and our own power grid have far to go before battery powered cars can be considered mainstream. You can skew facts any way you like but $20000 cars that get 35-40 mpg are going to make more sense to people for a long time to come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That subsidy is not instantaneous, it comes at the end of the year when you file your taxes and may or may not actually put any cash in your pocket depending on your tax burden. Lithium batteries are inherently dangerous and not ready for large applications like automobiles no matter how desperate you are to get us off our petroleum fix. The US reserves of lithium are estimated to be 38000 tons which is pretty laughable compared to the 7.5 million in Chile and the 800000 in Argentina which is where it really comes from. The Union of Concerned Scientists pegs coal as 54% of our electric generating source but beyond that we have some of the dirtiest power plants on the globe and we&#8217;re even lagging behind China in building cleaner ones. Battery technology and our own power grid have far to go before battery powered cars can be considered mainstream. You can skew facts any way you like but $20000 cars that get 35-40 mpg are going to make more sense to people for a long time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The average US new car is roughly $29,000.

The Volt is about $33,000 after the federal subsidy.

As manufacturing volumes rise the cost will drop eliminating the need for the temporary subsidies which we are using to build US manufacturing can to create American jobs.

The US grid is now about 44% coal and falling.

The non EV/PHEV is burning a lot of imported oil.  We spend about $1 billion per day for imported oil and we spend close to another billion fighting our oil wars.

We are now mining and refining lithium in the US.  We should soon be extracting additional lithium from US geothermal waste water.

Rational people are governed by facts.   Some people attempt to sway others with dishonest statements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average US new car is roughly $29,000.</p>
<p>The Volt is about $33,000 after the federal subsidy.</p>
<p>As manufacturing volumes rise the cost will drop eliminating the need for the temporary subsidies which we are using to build US manufacturing can to create American jobs.</p>
<p>The US grid is now about 44% coal and falling.</p>
<p>The non EV/PHEV is burning a lot of imported oil.  We spend about $1 billion per day for imported oil and we spend close to another billion fighting our oil wars.</p>
<p>We are now mining and refining lithium in the US.  We should soon be extracting additional lithium from US geothermal waste water.</p>
<p>Rational people are governed by facts.   Some people attempt to sway others with dishonest statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/08/chevy-volt-gets-highest-satisfaction-rating-in-consumer-reports/#comment-108811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32799#comment-108811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re talking about people who spent over forty thousand dollars on a plug in hybrid that trades overseas oil use with overseas lithium mining and is charged with coal burning power plants. Is any rational person supposed to be swayed by this news?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re talking about people who spent over forty thousand dollars on a plug in hybrid that trades overseas oil use with overseas lithium mining and is charged with coal burning power plants. Is any rational person supposed to be swayed by this news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
