<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 141 GW of European Offshore Wind Under Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 03:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-150225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-150225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming in late, but love the discussion. It ain´t just the wind, friends.  Closely observe Germany´s build out of waste incineration plants coupled with long distance-heat-hot water systems. Watch its sewage sludge bio gas generation system. Agrarian bio-gas is just getting started- and will be producing 44 GW by the end of 2025.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming in late, but love the discussion. It ain´t just the wind, friends.  Closely observe Germany´s build out of waste incineration plants coupled with long distance-heat-hot water systems. Watch its sewage sludge bio gas generation system. Agrarian bio-gas is just getting started- and will be producing 44 GW by the end of 2025.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-120547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-120547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google says that Vicki says -

In Germany, a large number of jobs in the clean energy sector.The government has been actively involved in this process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google says that Vicki says &#8211;</p>
<p>In Germany, a large number of jobs in the clean energy sector.The government has been actively involved in this process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Stuart</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-120545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicki Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-120545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Deutschland eine große Anzahl von Arbeitsplätzen im Bereich saubere Energie. Die Regierung hat sich aktiv an diesem Prozess beteiligt.
http://www.ewea.com/green-jobs-in-germany/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Deutschland eine große Anzahl von Arbeitsplätzen im Bereich saubere Energie. Die Regierung hat sich aktiv an diesem Prozess beteiligt.<br />
<a href="http://www.ewea.com/green-jobs-in-germany/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ewea.com/green-jobs-in-germany/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-119479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-119479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[josetony,

130 million is waaaay too much indeed. 4 GW of offshore wind will produce about 14 TWh annually. The average european household consumes about 3500 kWh per year. Divide the two and the result is 4 million homes. 

Btw I find the &#039;homes&#039; metric a bit misleading as household consumption is only about a quarter of total electricity consumption. We also need to power our factories and offices and trains and trams and street lights etc.

So if you assign a proportionate part of this &#039;other&#039; consumption to each household, the 4 GW of offshore wind is enough to power 1 million households.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>josetony,</p>
<p>130 million is waaaay too much indeed. 4 GW of offshore wind will produce about 14 TWh annually. The average european household consumes about 3500 kWh per year. Divide the two and the result is 4 million homes. </p>
<p>Btw I find the &#8216;homes&#8217; metric a bit misleading as household consumption is only about a quarter of total electricity consumption. We also need to power our factories and offices and trains and trams and street lights etc.</p>
<p>So if you assign a proportionate part of this &#8216;other&#8217; consumption to each household, the 4 GW of offshore wind is enough to power 1 million households.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josetony</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-118442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[josetony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-118442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there is a mistake on the report about the number of houses powered by the offshore wind. It says 130 million homes are powered by 4,000 megawatts of offshore wind. It will come out to 32,500 houses per megawatt which is way too high. A megawatt of power is good for 500-600 houses in the US. I know that houses in Europe use less electricity. I assume that maybe you put an extra zero by mistake and the reality could be 13 million homes that will translate to 3,250 homes per megawatt. This I think is more realistic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a mistake on the report about the number of houses powered by the offshore wind. It says 130 million homes are powered by 4,000 megawatts of offshore wind. It will come out to 32,500 houses per megawatt which is way too high. A megawatt of power is good for 500-600 houses in the US. I know that houses in Europe use less electricity. I assume that maybe you put an extra zero by mistake and the reality could be 13 million homes that will translate to 3,250 homes per megawatt. This I think is more realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EU Considers Tightening Caps as Carbon Price Collapses</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-109892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EU Considers Tightening Caps as Carbon Price Collapses]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-109892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at 84 GW, as well as controlling 99% of the burgeoning offshore wind industry. (Previous story: 141 GW of European Offshore Wind Under Way.)(Related: Why DOE-Funded Floating Turbines May Change Future  of Off Shore Wind.)The other option [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] at 84 GW, as well as controlling 99% of the burgeoning offshore wind industry. (Previous story: 141 GW of European Offshore Wind Under Way.)(Related: Why DOE-Funded Floating Turbines May Change Future  of Off Shore Wind.)The other option [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why DOE-Funded Floating Turbines May Change Future of Offshore Wind</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-108975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why DOE-Funded Floating Turbines May Change Future of Offshore Wind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-108975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] world&#8217;s offshore wind is already a maturing industrial sector in Europe, with a staggering 141 GW of offshore wind in the pipeline.In Europe offshore wind projects are going forward with turbines attached to the sea floor which [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] world&#8217;s offshore wind is already a maturing industrial sector in Europe, with a staggering 141 GW of offshore wind in the pipeline.In Europe offshore wind projects are going forward with turbines attached to the sea floor which [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EU Invades US for Energy Resource &#8211; Offshore Wind &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/07/141-gw-of-european-offshore-wind-under-way/#comment-108916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EU Invades US for Energy Resource &#8211; Offshore Wind &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32730#comment-108916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] floating turbine on these shores. Europe makes 99% of the offshore wind power in the world and is on track to build 141 GW more!!! over the next two decades. But Europe only has so much coastal water near population centers, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] floating turbine on these shores. Europe makes 99% of the offshore wind power in the world and is on track to build 141 GW more!!! over the next two decades. But Europe only has so much coastal water near population centers, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
