<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gasoline Fuel Cell Would Boost Electric Car Range</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EsotericWombat</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-127463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EsotericWombat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-127463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is nice and all, but the solution to range anxiety is to electrify the highways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice and all, but the solution to range anxiety is to electrify the highways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article on a very important subject.  The rapid advancement of technology is amazing. Now that the large car companies like General Motors and Ford have started to utilize the technology that has been around for awhile, maybe it will snowball towards faster realization of these Eco-friendy technologies.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article on a very important subject.  The rapid advancement of technology is amazing. Now that the large car companies like General Motors and Ford have started to utilize the technology that has been around for awhile, maybe it will snowball towards faster realization of these Eco-friendy technologies.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love this:

In other words, why haven&#039;t we heard of the thousands of EV drivers over the last decade and a half complain about getting stuck with no charge because they didn&#039;t plan properly. It&#039;s because if you have half a brain, you won&#039;t put yourself in that situation. You&#039;ll use your secondary gas car or rent/borrow a gas car or take public transit to make that long trip. It becomes part of your routine mental process, just like you constantly monitoring your cell phone charge state.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love this:</p>
<p>In other words, why haven&#8217;t we heard of the thousands of EV drivers over the last decade and a half complain about getting stuck with no charge because they didn&#8217;t plan properly. It&#8217;s because if you have half a brain, you won&#8217;t put yourself in that situation. You&#8217;ll use your secondary gas car or rent/borrow a gas car or take public transit to make that long trip. It becomes part of your routine mental process, just like you constantly monitoring your cell phone charge state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anumakonda Jagadeesh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anumakonda Jagadeesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gasoline Fuel Cell is future energy storage.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gasoline Fuel Cell is future energy storage.</p>
<p>Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com">anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Plahn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Plahn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are they burning fuel to heat it up or using electric from the battery?  I&#039;m just wondering...  

Size and I&#039;m assuming weight would be big benefits to this system  The Chevy Volts dua power plants (battery/generator) add weight and take up room that could otherwise be allotted to passengers or luggage.  

The fact that this system is being considered is tribute to GM&#039;s foresight in bringing the Volt to market.  GM is in an ideal position to take advantage of advanced power generation technologies such as fuel cells.  No other company has a production model that could take advantage of these. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they burning fuel to heat it up or using electric from the battery?  I&#8217;m just wondering&#8230;  </p>
<p>Size and I&#8217;m assuming weight would be big benefits to this system  The Chevy Volts dua power plants (battery/generator) add weight and take up room that could otherwise be allotted to passengers or luggage.  </p>
<p>The fact that this system is being considered is tribute to GM&#8217;s foresight in bringing the Volt to market.  GM is in an ideal position to take advantage of advanced power generation technologies such as fuel cells.  No other company has a production model that could take advantage of these. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what I put in...

600 vdc
335 amps (67kWh/600x3 - one third of an hour charge time)
5&#039; for cable length.  Obviously could be much shorter with clever design. 2% acceptable loss.
Calculated size 9 AWG

1% acceptable loss = 6 AWG
5% acceptable loss = 13 AWG

As infrequently as most people would use a Level 3 charger (or should we call this a Level 4?) I would think a 5% loss would be acceptable. Charging up with $0.12/kWh power would make the total cost only ~ $0.40 higher.


You see a mistake I made?  I&#039;m not used to working with these sort of numbers.  I&#039;m sort of a 120vac guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I put in&#8230;</p>
<p>600 vdc<br />
335 amps (67kWh/600&#215;3 &#8211; one third of an hour charge time)<br />
5&#8242; for cable length.  Obviously could be much shorter with clever design. 2% acceptable loss.<br />
Calculated size 9 AWG</p>
<p>1% acceptable loss = 6 AWG<br />
5% acceptable loss = 13 AWG</p>
<p>As infrequently as most people would use a Level 3 charger (or should we call this a Level 4?) I would think a 5% loss would be acceptable. Charging up with $0.12/kWh power would make the total cost only ~ $0.40 higher.</p>
<p>You see a mistake I made?  I&#8217;m not used to working with these sort of numbers.  I&#8217;m sort of a 120vac guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need the sort of electrical service that we install at highway interstates.  The sort that will power multiple deep fat fryers and lots of AC.  That&#039;s where we&#039;re putting Level 3 chargers now.

And you&#039;d need some honking big connectors.

Do the math with close to 20 minutes.  Don&#039;t distort the issue by using five.

0.35kWh/mile.  175 miles.  Add in another 10% for charging inefficiency. 18 minutes.  Say 67kWh.

(I tried with an online DC calculator and the size looked too small.)

Yes, there could easily be a need for buffering at the site.  Some ultracapactors or batteries could do that part of the job as well as lowering peak needs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need the sort of electrical service that we install at highway interstates.  The sort that will power multiple deep fat fryers and lots of AC.  That&#8217;s where we&#8217;re putting Level 3 chargers now.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;d need some honking big connectors.</p>
<p>Do the math with close to 20 minutes.  Don&#8217;t distort the issue by using five.</p>
<p>0.35kWh/mile.  175 miles.  Add in another 10% for charging inefficiency. 18 minutes.  Say 67kWh.</p>
<p>(I tried with an online DC calculator and the size looked too small.)</p>
<p>Yes, there could easily be a need for buffering at the site.  Some ultracapactors or batteries could do that part of the job as well as lowering peak needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with fast charging isn&#039;t the batteries. 

Lets walk through this - 175 miles of highway range is about 350Wh for a Volt-style vehicle, or 61kWh. So at what rate do you have to recharge that battery to get 61kWh into the battery in 5 minutes? 1.28MW. How big of copper conductors do you need to push 1.28MW of 600V/2100A DC power back into the battery? The tables I have don&#039;t go up that high - you&#039;d need at least seven 4/0 AWG copper conductors in parallel to carry that much current. 

How is the grid going to handle going from 0 to 1.28MW for 5 minutes then turning off? You&#039;d need some sort of grid-side load balance to take some of the load. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with fast charging isn&#8217;t the batteries. </p>
<p>Lets walk through this &#8211; 175 miles of highway range is about 350Wh for a Volt-style vehicle, or 61kWh. So at what rate do you have to recharge that battery to get 61kWh into the battery in 5 minutes? 1.28MW. How big of copper conductors do you need to push 1.28MW of 600V/2100A DC power back into the battery? The tables I have don&#8217;t go up that high &#8211; you&#8217;d need at least seven 4/0 AWG copper conductors in parallel to carry that much current. </p>
<p>How is the grid going to handle going from 0 to 1.28MW for 5 minutes then turning off? You&#8217;d need some sort of grid-side load balance to take some of the load. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fast recharging isn&#039;t really a problem.  The Toshiba SCiB lithium-ion battery that Honda is using in their EVs will take a 95% recharge in less than 20 minutes.

What we need is around 175 miles of  highway range.  That would allow a 500 mile driving day with two short stops.  About what people would do with ICEVs.

The question is whether range will increase or fuel cell price decrease fastest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast recharging isn&#8217;t really a problem.  The Toshiba SCiB lithium-ion battery that Honda is using in their EVs will take a 95% recharge in less than 20 minutes.</p>
<p>What we need is around 175 miles of  highway range.  That would allow a 500 mile driving day with two short stops.  About what people would do with ICEVs.</p>
<p>The question is whether range will increase or fuel cell price decrease fastest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The eventual goal as stated in the source article of 350C seems a bit hot, but maybe its reasonable. As stated, it seems like a great way to provide for range extension, as well as for providing a fast-refill capability on longer journeys. 

By the time this becomes commercially viable (5-10 years) batteries will be able to get us around town (100+ miles) no problem. But a four or five hour drive isn&#039;t possible due to a number of issues (battery size, fast recharge, etc). Having a small fuel tank and this as a range extender (if its twice as efficient as ICE) would allow people to drive for 300-400 miles, along with being able to stop, refill the gas tank in five minutes, and be off for another 300 miles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eventual goal as stated in the source article of 350C seems a bit hot, but maybe its reasonable. As stated, it seems like a great way to provide for range extension, as well as for providing a fast-refill capability on longer journeys. </p>
<p>By the time this becomes commercially viable (5-10 years) batteries will be able to get us around town (100+ miles) no problem. But a four or five hour drive isn&#8217;t possible due to a number of issues (battery size, fast recharge, etc). Having a small fuel tank and this as a range extender (if its twice as efficient as ICE) would allow people to drive for 300-400 miles, along with being able to stop, refill the gas tank in five minutes, and be off for another 300 miles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onthefence</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/05/gasoline-fuel-cell-would-boost-electric-car-range/#comment-108579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onthefence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32650#comment-108579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other important consideration is efficiency of energy conversion. And maintenance costs. Not to be a naysayer, but 650C is still pretty hot to be carrying around in your car. That said, this is another concept that could be the saving grace for a complete conversion to plugin vehicles. 

Range is not so much something to worry about, but it is a reality,  an important nuance to bring up. In other words, why haven&#039;t we heard of the thousands of EV drivers over the last decade and a half complain about getting stuck with no charge because they didn&#039;t plan properly. It&#039;s because if you have half a brain, you won&#039;t put yourself in that situation. You&#039;ll use your secondary gas car or rent/borrow a gas car or take public transit to make that long trip. It becomes part of your routine mental process, just like you constantly monitoring your cell phone charge state. 

But range COUPLED WITH CHARGE TIMES means that EVs are only practical for certain types of transit. This is an important distinction from range anxiety. You can&#039;t drive cross country very efficiently for example, but you COULD do it as shown by a number of cross country or around the world EV races. 

Hopefully people will begin to understand EVs better than they currently do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other important consideration is efficiency of energy conversion. And maintenance costs. Not to be a naysayer, but 650C is still pretty hot to be carrying around in your car. That said, this is another concept that could be the saving grace for a complete conversion to plugin vehicles. </p>
<p>Range is not so much something to worry about, but it is a reality,  an important nuance to bring up. In other words, why haven&#8217;t we heard of the thousands of EV drivers over the last decade and a half complain about getting stuck with no charge because they didn&#8217;t plan properly. It&#8217;s because if you have half a brain, you won&#8217;t put yourself in that situation. You&#8217;ll use your secondary gas car or rent/borrow a gas car or take public transit to make that long trip. It becomes part of your routine mental process, just like you constantly monitoring your cell phone charge state. </p>
<p>But range COUPLED WITH CHARGE TIMES means that EVs are only practical for certain types of transit. This is an important distinction from range anxiety. You can&#8217;t drive cross country very efficiently for example, but you COULD do it as shown by a number of cross country or around the world EV races. </p>
<p>Hopefully people will begin to understand EVs better than they currently do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
