<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only Way to Stop Greenhouse Gas Emissions is to Use Clean Electricity, Study Finds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Energy From the Sahara Desert Could Power the World &#8211; But Will It? - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-122837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar Energy From the Sahara Desert Could Power the World &#8211; But Will It? - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-122837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Shuman believed that humanity would revert to barbarism without it, and Knies felt that it was the only way to avoid dirty and dangerous fossil fuels. Knies even went so far as to say that the desert received enough energy in a few hours to power [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Shuman believed that humanity would revert to barbarism without it, and Knies felt that it was the only way to avoid dirty and dangerous fossil fuels. Knies even went so far as to say that the desert received enough energy in a few hours to power [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help American Wind Energy &#8212; Get the PTC Renewed - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-115075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Help American Wind Energy &#8212; Get the PTC Renewed - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-115075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] wind industry, it should be renewed, and your rep will help decide that. I don’t have to tell you why renewable energy is a good thing – you’re already here, reading this blog, and chances are you agree [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wind industry, it should be renewed, and your rep will help decide that. I don’t have to tell you why renewable energy is a good thing – you’re already here, reading this blog, and chances are you agree [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Tokyo Tower Greener Than Expected, But Not Green Enough &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Tokyo Tower Greener Than Expected, But Not Green Enough &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] include an aquarium, a theater, and not less than 310 shops for tourists – all of which will need a considerable amount of energy to maintain.Where Does It All Go??The EcoAssist-Enterprise-Light is supposed to provide real-time [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] include an aquarium, a theater, and not less than 310 shops for tourists – all of which will need a considerable amount of energy to maintain.Where Does It All Go??The EcoAssist-Enterprise-Light is supposed to provide real-time [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about buying a piece of a community solar farm?  You would get the benefits of the panels without having them attached to your home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about buying a piece of a community solar farm?  You would get the benefits of the panels without having them attached to your home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Garcia</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy Garcia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe the 80% by 2050 goal comes from NASA&#039;s chief climate scientist James Hansen among others. 
For all you techies, is there a clean energy form that I can put on a condo, besides low-e windows and insulation? They don&#039;t like solar and I think that might extend to small wind turbines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the 80% by 2050 goal comes from NASA&#8217;s chief climate scientist James Hansen among others.<br />
For all you techies, is there a clean energy form that I can put on a condo, besides low-e windows and insulation? They don&#8217;t like solar and I think that might extend to small wind turbines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas isn&#039;t the most blame-worthy in my book.

Texas is a leader in onshore wind and is moving forward with offshore wind.  They might even be the first in the US to get towers in the water.

And they&#039;re starting to get going with solar.  As well, Houston is getting a lot of EV charge points in place.

Now, Texans serving in Congress, that&#039;s likely a different story.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas isn&#8217;t the most blame-worthy in my book.</p>
<p>Texas is a leader in onshore wind and is moving forward with offshore wind.  They might even be the first in the US to get towers in the water.</p>
<p>And they&#8217;re starting to get going with solar.  As well, Houston is getting a lot of EV charge points in place.</p>
<p>Now, Texans serving in Congress, that&#8217;s likely a different story.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charis Michelsen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charis Michelsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is indeed a trick question! :)  

Seriously, though, imagine how different the move toward cleaner energy would be if, for example, we were all driving electric cars and shifting from coal and nuclear power to renewable energy - so much easier than shifting from gas-powered to electric cars. (I blame Texas for this, which is likely politically incorrect of me.) 

PS - I cannot sign in with Facebook, for some reason, which is why the site seems to think I&#039;m a guest. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed a trick question! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  </p>
<p>Seriously, though, imagine how different the move toward cleaner energy would be if, for example, we were all driving electric cars and shifting from coal and nuclear power to renewable energy &#8211; so much easier than shifting from gas-powered to electric cars. (I blame Texas for this, which is likely politically incorrect of me.) </p>
<p>PS &#8211; I cannot sign in with Facebook, for some reason, which is why the site seems to think I&#8217;m a guest. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s an interesting geothermal conversion case history.  These people replaced a propane heating system and air conditioner with an $18,200 geothermal system.

They give a financial analysis based on the 2009 price of propane at $2.15/gallon even though it had already risen to $3.33/gallon by this last March.  Using the lower propane price they save $2,820 a year.   That&#039;s a 6.5 year payback and roughly 11% per year.

Based on more recent propane costs of $3.33/gallon the savings would be $4,370 per year.  That makes for a 4.1 year payback and roughly 17.5% per year.

http://www.geothermalgenius.org/thinking-of-buying/geothermal-installation-by-the-numbers-in-pennsylvania.html

I do think the $18k price too high, but even overpaying if you&#039;re getting a 11% - 17.5% return should you refuse to install?  I think not.  How do you get 15%+ returns on investment short of becoming a loan shark and  busting kneecaps?

Borrow the money, pay off the loan in four to seven years, and then enjoy significant savings.   Ed is right, when you install geothermal you&#039;ve locked in your main source of heat (or cool) at a fixed price.  Those who make their heat with fossil fuels or electricity are almost certainly going to get hurt as prices rise.

--

Are there low interest geothermal loans for people with limited incomes?   Saving a couple hundred dollars a month can be a major help for a lot of people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting geothermal conversion case history.  These people replaced a propane heating system and air conditioner with an $18,200 geothermal system.</p>
<p>They give a financial analysis based on the 2009 price of propane at $2.15/gallon even though it had already risen to $3.33/gallon by this last March.  Using the lower propane price they save $2,820 a year.   That&#8217;s a 6.5 year payback and roughly 11% per year.</p>
<p>Based on more recent propane costs of $3.33/gallon the savings would be $4,370 per year.  That makes for a 4.1 year payback and roughly 17.5% per year.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geothermalgenius.org/thinking-of-buying/geothermal-installation-by-the-numbers-in-pennsylvania.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geothermalgenius.org/thinking-of-buying/geothermal-installation-by-the-numbers-in-pennsylvania.html</a></p>
<p>I do think the $18k price too high, but even overpaying if you&#8217;re getting a 11% &#8211; 17.5% return should you refuse to install?  I think not.  How do you get 15%+ returns on investment short of becoming a loan shark and  busting kneecaps?</p>
<p>Borrow the money, pay off the loan in four to seven years, and then enjoy significant savings.   Ed is right, when you install geothermal you&#8217;ve locked in your main source of heat (or cool) at a fixed price.  Those who make their heat with fossil fuels or electricity are almost certainly going to get hurt as prices rise.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Are there low interest geothermal loans for people with limited incomes?   Saving a couple hundred dollars a month can be a major help for a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems clear and obvious on the surface, but is it worth the potential cost?

This is a trick question, right?? 

Everyone who installs any energy system from now on will be only hurting themselves if they go for the &quot;less expensive&quot; up front cost of &quot;business as usual&quot; Bob notes a 12% return in six years but after amortizing the initial cost the return will escalate yearly until the hardware needs replacing. The rising cost of fossils will assure that.

Ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems clear and obvious on the surface, but is it worth the potential cost?</p>
<p>This is a trick question, right?? </p>
<p>Everyone who installs any energy system from now on will be only hurting themselves if they go for the &#8220;less expensive&#8221; up front cost of &#8220;business as usual&#8221; Bob notes a 12% return in six years but after amortizing the initial cost the return will escalate yearly until the hardware needs replacing. The rising cost of fossils will assure that.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent question.

Actually $10k might not be too bad.  I&#039;m seeing reports of people paying far more for a residential geothermal.

An air to air heat pump might cost $4k or $5k if the duct work is already in place.  A 400&#039; well is likely to be over $5k.  (Based on the cost of drilling a water well.  $15/foot would be a good price.)

As installation companies get more experienced and there is more competition prices should come down but I wouldn&#039;t bet there&#039;s much room below $10k.

$10k is not that bad a price.  Subtract the cost of the alternative system (~$4k for an air to air) and then look at the payoff time for the difference.  If the geothermal system saves you an average of $200 a month for five months you&#039;re looking at a six year payback.  That&#039;s a 12% return on investment.

A heat pump or furnace/air conditioner might need replacing in 20 years. The geothermal well should be permanent.

If you need AC in the summer your savings will be greater and payback sooner.  If you live in the middle of the country where it gets cold in the
winter and hot in the summer a geothermal heat pump could be a wise
purchase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent question.</p>
<p>Actually $10k might not be too bad.  I&#8217;m seeing reports of people paying far more for a residential geothermal.</p>
<p>An air to air heat pump might cost $4k or $5k if the duct work is already in place.  A 400&#8242; well is likely to be over $5k.  (Based on the cost of drilling a water well.  $15/foot would be a good price.)</p>
<p>As installation companies get more experienced and there is more competition prices should come down but I wouldn&#8217;t bet there&#8217;s much room below $10k.</p>
<p>$10k is not that bad a price.  Subtract the cost of the alternative system (~$4k for an air to air) and then look at the payoff time for the difference.  If the geothermal system saves you an average of $200 a month for five months you&#8217;re looking at a six year payback.  That&#8217;s a 12% return on investment.</p>
<p>A heat pump or furnace/air conditioner might need replacing in 20 years. The geothermal well should be permanent.</p>
<p>If you need AC in the summer your savings will be greater and payback sooner.  If you live in the middle of the country where it gets cold in the<br />
winter and hot in the summer a geothermal heat pump could be a wise<br />
purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/25/only-way-to-stop-greenhouse-gas-emissions-is-to-use-clean-electricity-study-finds/#comment-108040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32433#comment-108040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course it&#039;s worth it.  Many of the technologies don&#039;t need to be anywhere as expensive as they are.  Ground source heat pumps for example are just fridges in reverse.  Why are they $10000+ to install?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s worth it.  Many of the technologies don&#8217;t need to be anywhere as expensive as they are.  Ground source heat pumps for example are just fridges in reverse.  Why are they $10000+ to install?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
