<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China-US Solar Trade War Has Complex Arguments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Solar-China Trade Dispute</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-110632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[On the Solar-China Trade Dispute]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-110632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you&#8217;re in the solar industry, or care much about it, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard of the &#8220;solar trade war&#8221;/solar industry trade dispute going on right now. Basically, a handful of solar manufacturing companies from the U.S. and Germany [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you&#8217;re in the solar industry, or care much about it, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard of the &#8220;solar trade war&#8221;/solar industry trade dispute going on right now. Basically, a handful of solar manufacturing companies from the U.S. and Germany [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-108030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-108030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me add, China has some things that need improvement.  Their human rights, citizen control over government, and freedom of speech suck graded by developed nation standards.

But the discussion is about energy issues and it looks to me that China is taking renewable energy more seriously than most western/developed countries.

The United States should be the very last country to complain about China&#039;s CO2 emissions.  China is charging forward with renewables and EVs.  We&#039;re letting dunderheads block our way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add, China has some things that need improvement.  Their human rights, citizen control over government, and freedom of speech suck graded by developed nation standards.</p>
<p>But the discussion is about energy issues and it looks to me that China is taking renewable energy more seriously than most western/developed countries.</p>
<p>The United States should be the very last country to complain about China&#8217;s CO2 emissions.  China is charging forward with renewables and EVs.  We&#8217;re letting dunderheads block our way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-108003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-108003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the best piece on China I think I&#039;ve ever read. :D  Well done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the best piece on China I think I&#8217;ve ever read. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" />  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-107985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-107985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This appears to be the latest numbers for total CO2 emissions.  The top seven...

China 7711 million metric tons

US 5425 million metric tons

India 1602 million metric tons

Russia 1572 million metric tons

Japan 1098 million metric tons

Germany 766 million metric tons

South Korea 528 million metric tons

Canada 541 million tons
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/31/world-carbon-dioxide-emissions-country-data-co2#zoomed-picture 
Here&#039;s the same group of countries based on CO2 per capita...

United States 17.3 metric tons

Canada 15.7 metric tons

Russia 11.0 metric tons

South Korea 10.9 metric tons

Germany 9.3 metric tons

Japan 8.9 metric tons

China 5.7 metric tons

India 1.3 metric tons

You seem to have a lot of China hate bubbling around, but when it comes
down to it China is not releasing much CO2 per person.  Additionally they
are doing a lot of the manufacturing of products which are consumed in the
US and that lowers US levels.  We&#039;ve outsourced a lot of our CO2 to China
and other countries.

China is now installing solar and wind more aggressively than is the US.
 Not on a per capita basis, but they&#039;re gaining there as well.

China is opening coal plants but what is mostly happening is that they are
replacing around 7,000 dirty coal plants that they shut a couple of years
ago with modern, efficient coal plants.  If one takes a look at their
energy plans it appears that they feel that they have  to use coal in the
short run (as Germany is now doing) but their intention (like Germany&#039;s) is
to end up with a clean grid.

China is beginning to tighten regulations and to clean up their industry.
 And to clean up their urban air.  China has just implemented a major
program to put as many drivers as possible into EV rather than liquid fuel
vehicles.  And China has opted for electrified high speed rail rather than
air travel.

China is undervaluing their currency, but they have announced that they do
not intend to do so on a permanent basis.  It&#039;s a little hard to fault
China for being self-centered in their attempt to pull a billion people out
of poverty in a short period of time.

Labor prices are rising in China and we are starting to see some
manufacturing returning to the US.  Right now we can be competitive with
products which have low labor inputs and are bulky/expensive to ship.  As
oil prices rise and Chinese standards of living rise we will find that we
can compete in more and more areas.  Chinese wages will rise and Chinese
citizens will be an enormous new market which will likely suck up most of
what China can produce.

And, no, I do not receive any funding from China....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to be the latest numbers for total CO2 emissions.  The top seven&#8230;</p>
<p>China 7711 million metric tons</p>
<p>US 5425 million metric tons</p>
<p>India 1602 million metric tons</p>
<p>Russia 1572 million metric tons</p>
<p>Japan 1098 million metric tons</p>
<p>Germany 766 million metric tons</p>
<p>South Korea 528 million metric tons</p>
<p>Canada 541 million tons<br />
 <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/31/world-carbon-dioxide-emissions-country-data-co2#zoomed-picture" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/31/world-carbon-dioxide-emissions-country-data-co2#zoomed-picture</a><br />
Here&#8217;s the same group of countries based on CO2 per capita&#8230;</p>
<p>United States 17.3 metric tons</p>
<p>Canada 15.7 metric tons</p>
<p>Russia 11.0 metric tons</p>
<p>South Korea 10.9 metric tons</p>
<p>Germany 9.3 metric tons</p>
<p>Japan 8.9 metric tons</p>
<p>China 5.7 metric tons</p>
<p>India 1.3 metric tons</p>
<p>You seem to have a lot of China hate bubbling around, but when it comes<br />
down to it China is not releasing much CO2 per person.  Additionally they<br />
are doing a lot of the manufacturing of products which are consumed in the<br />
US and that lowers US levels.  We&#8217;ve outsourced a lot of our CO2 to China<br />
and other countries.</p>
<p>China is now installing solar and wind more aggressively than is the US.<br />
 Not on a per capita basis, but they&#8217;re gaining there as well.</p>
<p>China is opening coal plants but what is mostly happening is that they are<br />
replacing around 7,000 dirty coal plants that they shut a couple of years<br />
ago with modern, efficient coal plants.  If one takes a look at their<br />
energy plans it appears that they feel that they have  to use coal in the<br />
short run (as Germany is now doing) but their intention (like Germany&#8217;s) is<br />
to end up with a clean grid.</p>
<p>China is beginning to tighten regulations and to clean up their industry.<br />
 And to clean up their urban air.  China has just implemented a major<br />
program to put as many drivers as possible into EV rather than liquid fuel<br />
vehicles.  And China has opted for electrified high speed rail rather than<br />
air travel.</p>
<p>China is undervaluing their currency, but they have announced that they do<br />
not intend to do so on a permanent basis.  It&#8217;s a little hard to fault<br />
China for being self-centered in their attempt to pull a billion people out<br />
of poverty in a short period of time.</p>
<p>Labor prices are rising in China and we are starting to see some<br />
manufacturing returning to the US.  Right now we can be competitive with<br />
products which have low labor inputs and are bulky/expensive to ship.  As<br />
oil prices rise and Chinese standards of living rise we will find that we<br />
can compete in more and more areas.  Chinese wages will rise and Chinese<br />
citizens will be an enormous new market which will likely suck up most of<br />
what China can produce.</p>
<p>And, no, I do not receive any funding from China&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-107979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-107979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[on top of Susan&#039;s reply, i&#039;ll just add that China doesn&#039;t contribute ANYTHING to us. And we don;t benefit in any clear way from point out China&#039;s clean energy leadership.


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on top of Susan&#8217;s reply, i&#8217;ll just add that China doesn&#8217;t contribute ANYTHING to us. And we don;t benefit in any clear way from point out China&#8217;s clean energy leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-107977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-107977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree that China has enormous pollution problems, (unrelated to solar, mostly) it is wrong that their &quot;main source of hydro power is from coal&quot;. These are two different forms of energy, one clean - one dirty.

Hydro-electric power is generated by water in rivers simply rushing though turbines, unaided by coal. Hydro power is a renewable form of energy, unlike coal. 

But China, while it now leads the world in hydro power, as a developing country with regard to hydro (about equivalent to the US a century ago) has made some gigantic mistakes in how it went in to that too, with some of the worst environmental damage in the world. Another complex mess of good and bad!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that China has enormous pollution problems, (unrelated to solar, mostly) it is wrong that their &#8220;main source of hydro power is from coal&#8221;. These are two different forms of energy, one clean &#8211; one dirty.</p>
<p>Hydro-electric power is generated by water in rivers simply rushing though turbines, unaided by coal. Hydro power is a renewable form of energy, unlike coal. </p>
<p>But China, while it now leads the world in hydro power, as a developing country with regard to hydro (about equivalent to the US a century ago) has made some gigantic mistakes in how it went in to that too, with some of the worst environmental damage in the world. Another complex mess of good and bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Norrad</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-107967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Norrad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-107967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, how much does China contribute to you ? I sense that there is some hipocracy here. China is one of the worlds big polluters. One cannot breathe in the green air of Beijing in summer. Their main
source of hydro power is from coal and they are building coal fired generation to keep up with their growth. You remind me of David Suziki, who defends China as a non-polluter while being funded by the Chinese in a big way and all the while having a bigger carbon footprint than Al Gore. And the Chinese are known for flooding the markets with cheap products, undervalued by huge subsidies.
In additon they have no regulations on production standards, including food. And they keep their currency deliberately low rather than let it float on the world market like all other WTO members. 
They are crooks of the worst kind. They cannot be trusted in any venue. If they allowed their currency to float, stopped the huge subsidies, they would not be able to compete and the manufacturing would return to North America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how much does China contribute to you ? I sense that there is some hipocracy here. China is one of the worlds big polluters. One cannot breathe in the green air of Beijing in summer. Their main<br />
source of hydro power is from coal and they are building coal fired generation to keep up with their growth. You remind me of David Suziki, who defends China as a non-polluter while being funded by the Chinese in a big way and all the while having a bigger carbon footprint than Al Gore. And the Chinese are known for flooding the markets with cheap products, undervalued by huge subsidies.<br />
In additon they have no regulations on production standards, including food. And they keep their currency deliberately low rather than let it float on the world market like all other WTO members.<br />
They are crooks of the worst kind. They cannot be trusted in any venue. If they allowed their currency to float, stopped the huge subsidies, they would not be able to compete and the manufacturing would return to North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/24/china-us-solar-trade-war-has-complex-arguments/#comment-107962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32423#comment-107962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonderful post, Susan! Thanks for this :D

It is a complex case, but I think you really nail it here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful post, Susan! Thanks for this <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>It is a complex case, but I think you really nail it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
