<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gainesville (Florida) Bigger Per Capita Solar Producer than California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisarmingTheGreens - Black Hole Sun: Germany Spends €100 Billion in Solar Subsidies</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-112363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DisarmingTheGreens - Black Hole Sun: Germany Spends €100 Billion in Solar Subsidies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-112363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has peak conditions for solar power. While FiT might work in places that are actually sunny (e.g.  Gainesville, Florida), Germany averages only 1,528 hours of  sunshine a year, or one-third of all daylight hours. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has peak conditions for solar power. While FiT might work in places that are actually sunny (e.g.  Gainesville, Florida), Germany averages only 1,528 hours of  sunshine a year, or one-third of all daylight hours. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-110855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-110855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, hadn&#039;t heard about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, hadn&#8217;t heard about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-110853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-110853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) feed-in tariff system is a perfect example.  A perfect example, that is, of how NOT to administer a program, which, from the Gainesville communities’ perspective is widely regarded now, as a dismal failure.  Yes, it could have been a good program to promote solar installation.  Unfortunately it was rife with controversy and crony capitalism.
  
The problem was that Solar Impact, a Gainesville, FL solar contractor, was permitted by GRU to cheat the lottery-style system by submitting incomplete applications in the names of unregistered LLCs, and making application for multiple systems per roof top (other contractors were not permitted to do the same).  This practice, simply stated, resulted in a stacked deck which significantly disadvantaged other solar contractors, applicants, and Solar Impact’s own customers in the selection process.  Subsequently, Solar Impact was awarded 80% of the commercial capacity.

Small solar arrays comprise much of the 7.3 MW in Gainesville; however, the largest feed-in tariff systems currently in operation there, are owned by German companies which have no other ties to the community.  Participation in the feed-in tariff program by foreign companies results in a transfer of wealth out of the Gainesville area.

Civil suits are currently pending against GRU and Solar Impact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) feed-in tariff system is a perfect example.  A perfect example, that is, of how NOT to administer a program, which, from the Gainesville communities’ perspective is widely regarded now, as a dismal failure.  Yes, it could have been a good program to promote solar installation.  Unfortunately it was rife with controversy and crony capitalism.</p>
<p>The problem was that Solar Impact, a Gainesville, FL solar contractor, was permitted by GRU to cheat the lottery-style system by submitting incomplete applications in the names of unregistered LLCs, and making application for multiple systems per roof top (other contractors were not permitted to do the same).  This practice, simply stated, resulted in a stacked deck which significantly disadvantaged other solar contractors, applicants, and Solar Impact’s own customers in the selection process.  Subsequently, Solar Impact was awarded 80% of the commercial capacity.</p>
<p>Small solar arrays comprise much of the 7.3 MW in Gainesville; however, the largest feed-in tariff systems currently in operation there, are owned by German companies which have no other ties to the community.  Participation in the feed-in tariff program by foreign companies results in a transfer of wealth out of the Gainesville area.</p>
<p>Civil suits are currently pending against GRU and Solar Impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gainesville, Florida, Becomes a World Leader in Solar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-110731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gainesville, Florida, Becomes a World Leader in Solar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-110731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (MW) of solar to the city&#8217;s 125,000 residents.  The raw number isn&#8217;t much, but it puts Gainesville among the world leaders in solar installed per capita, beating out Japan, France, and China (and besting California, with 32 kilowatts -kW- per 1000 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (MW) of solar to the city&#8217;s 125,000 residents.  The raw number isn&#8217;t much, but it puts Gainesville among the world leaders in solar installed per capita, beating out Japan, France, and China (and besting California, with 32 kilowatts -kW- per 1000 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gainesville, Florida a Leader in Solar Energy &#124; Sustainablog</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-110454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gainesville, Florida a Leader in Solar Energy &#124; Sustainablog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-110454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Most people would think that this city must be in California, but they would be wrong. The city quickly ramping up their solar electrical generation capacity is a medium sized Florida city called Gainesvi.... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Most people would think that this city must be in California, but they would be wrong. The city quickly ramping up their solar electrical generation capacity is a medium sized Florida city called Gainesvi&#8230;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-107849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-107849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, updated. thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, updated. thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken O</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/22/gainesville-florida-bigger-per-capita-solar-producer-that-california/#comment-107848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32351#comment-107848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EDITOR: please tell writer to update title from &quot;That&quot; to &quot;Than&quot; and dock her $0.25 for the error. Cheers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EDITOR: please tell writer to update title from &#8220;That&#8221; to &#8220;Than&#8221; and dock her $0.25 for the error. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
