<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $500 Billion in Fossil Fuel Subsidies; Removing Them Would Boost Growth &amp; Revenues, Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: OECD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumping Solar: CASM&#8217;s Case Against Chinese Manufacturers &#38; Subsidies, Pt. II &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#comment-111760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dumping Solar: CASM&#8217;s Case Against Chinese Manufacturers &#38; Subsidies, Pt. II &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32239#comment-111760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and uneconomic. As has been pointed out in numerous studies, articles and blog posts (including here on Clean Technica), this conveniently ignores the fact that the US energy industry is highly [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and uneconomic. As has been pointed out in numerous studies, articles and blog posts (including here on Clean Technica), this conveniently ignores the fact that the US energy industry is highly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invest 2% of GDP in 10 Sectors Result: A Green Global Economy &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#comment-107527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Invest 2% of GDP in 10 Sectors Result: A Green Global Economy &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32239#comment-107527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Photo courtesy: SunPowerFor more on kick-starting the transition to a Green Global Economy, see:- $500 Billion in Fossil Fuel Subsidies; Removing Them Would Boost Growth &amp; Revenues, Reduce Green... - International Energy Agency: 5 Years to Change or Be Changed - Cleantech Continues to Rise as an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Photo courtesy: SunPowerFor more on kick-starting the transition to a Green Global Economy, see:- $500 Billion in Fossil Fuel Subsidies; Removing Them Would Boost Growth &amp; Revenues, Reduce Green&#8230; &#8211; International Energy Agency: 5 Years to Change or Be Changed &#8211; Cleantech Continues to Rise as an [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akbweb2</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#comment-107616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akbweb2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32239#comment-107616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thx again Ron. Updated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx again Ron. Updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Steenblik</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#comment-107615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Steenblik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32239#comment-107615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s because the map is for non-OECD countries; the flags are for OECD countries. (You can&#039;t imagine how controversial maps -- i.e., drawings of international borders -- has become ... )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because the map is for non-OECD countries; the flags are for OECD countries. (You can&#8217;t imagine how controversial maps &#8212; i.e., drawings of international borders &#8212; has become &#8230; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akbweb2</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#comment-107614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akbweb2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32239#comment-107614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Ron. I&#039;ve corrected the info about the project being a collaboration.

And, yes, lack of transparency may be too strong, though I found that the interactive map comes up with &#039;invalid data/ for the entire G7???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Ron. I&#8217;ve corrected the info about the project being a collaboration.</p>
<p>And, yes, lack of transparency may be too strong, though I found that the interactive map comes up with &#8216;invalid data/ for the entire G7???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/11/17/oecd-urges-removing-fossil-fuel-subsidies-to-boost-growth-revenues-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions/#comment-107606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=32239#comment-107606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for a complimentary article, but I must clarify a couple of the statements. While the report you mention was undertaken in &lt;i&gt;consultation&lt;/i&gt; with the IEA, it was otherwise solely a product of the OECD, not a collaborative effort. The collaborative effort was establishing a joint web portal.

I&#039;m also confused by your statement, &quot;The lack of valid data on fossil fuel subsidies in key countries, including the US, Japan, Germany, France, the UK and Canada – the entire OECD Group of Seven (G7) – highlights the lack of information and transparency.&quot; The very fact that the inventory was able to document so many programs in these countries shows that, for them, lack of information and transparency is not a problem. It&#039;s just that, up to now, nobody had bothered to search out and compile the information in one document.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a complimentary article, but I must clarify a couple of the statements. While the report you mention was undertaken in <i>consultation</i> with the IEA, it was otherwise solely a product of the OECD, not a collaborative effort. The collaborative effort was establishing a joint web portal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also confused by your statement, &#8220;The lack of valid data on fossil fuel subsidies in key countries, including the US, Japan, Germany, France, the UK and Canada – the entire OECD Group of Seven (G7) – highlights the lack of information and transparency.&#8221; The very fact that the inventory was able to document so many programs in these countries shows that, for them, lack of information and transparency is not a problem. It&#8217;s just that, up to now, nobody had bothered to search out and compile the information in one document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
