<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power of.. Solar Power (Infographic)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Coombie</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/#comment-106420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Coombie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31737#comment-106420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok! Ok people, do we go for solar power or not. Just a straight yes or no will do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok! Ok people, do we go for solar power or not. Just a straight yes or no will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/#comment-106369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Vaughn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31737#comment-106369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad Bill Woods has such a sharp eye. I had only caught the error: &quot;solar panels are made of Silicon which is just melted sand.&quot;

That&#039;s incorrect, as Bill pointed out. You could say &quot;solar panels are made of silicon which is just chemically reduced sand.&quot; 

That is to say that sand is silicon dioxide, while solar panels are (almost) pure silicon. There&#039;s a drastic difference in processing to simply melt sand compared to removing those two oxygen atoms from the silicon in sand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Bill Woods has such a sharp eye. I had only caught the error: &#8220;solar panels are made of Silicon which is just melted sand.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s incorrect, as Bill pointed out. You could say &#8220;solar panels are made of silicon which is just chemically reduced sand.&#8221; </p>
<p>That is to say that sand is silicon dioxide, while solar panels are (almost) pure silicon. There&#8217;s a drastic difference in processing to simply melt sand compared to removing those two oxygen atoms from the silicon in sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/#comment-106360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31737#comment-106360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to use the &quot;Contact us&quot; on your website, but got

&quot;There has been an error: ERROR: Code injection attempt denied! Please don&#039;t use the following sequences in your message: &#039;TO:&#039;, &#039;CC:&#039;, &#039;CCO:&#039; or &#039;Content-Type&#039;.&quot;

&quot;The sun strikes every square meter of our planet with more than 1,360 watts of power&quot;

The sun strikes the cross-section of the planet with that power. Since the Earth is a sphere, divide by 4. (pi r^2 vs. 4pi r^2)

&quot;terrawatts&quot; should be terawatts.

&quot;17 gigawatts is equivalent to 17 nuclear power plants&quot;

With a capacity factor of 10-30%, 17 GW of solar PV is equivalent to ~4 1-GW nuclear reactors, or ~2 two-reactor nuclear plants.

&quot;Solar panels are made of Silicone which is just melted sand.&quot;

Solar panels are made of silicon; the processing of which is a bit more involved.

&quot;The amount of energy we receive from the sun in one day is:
1.5 x 10 the 22 power Joules
translates to:
4.6 quadrillion kW/h
which looks like this:
4,166,666,667,000,000
(4.16 quadrillion)
At $.015 per kw/H that is worth:
$625,000,000,000,000&quot;

1.5 e22 J = 1.5 e22 J / 3600 s/h = 4.17 e15 kW-h of thermal energy.
If that were electrical energy, 
4.17 e15 kW(e)-h * 0.15 $/kW-h = $625 e12.

But 89 PW * 3600 s/h * 24 h = 7.7 e21 J of heat = 2.14 e15 kW(th)-h 
~~&gt; 3.2 e14 kW(e)-h at 15% efficiency 
~~&gt; $48 e12 at 0.15 $/kW-h
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to use the &#8220;Contact us&#8221; on your website, but got</p>
<p>&#8220;There has been an error: ERROR: Code injection attempt denied! Please don&#8217;t use the following sequences in your message: &#8216;TO:&#8217;, &#8216;CC:&#8217;, &#8216;CCO:&#8217; or &#8216;Content-Type&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The sun strikes every square meter of our planet with more than 1,360 watts of power&#8221;</p>
<p>The sun strikes the cross-section of the planet with that power. Since the Earth is a sphere, divide by 4. (pi r^2 vs. 4pi r^2)</p>
<p>&#8220;terrawatts&#8221; should be terawatts.</p>
<p>&#8220;17 gigawatts is equivalent to 17 nuclear power plants&#8221;</p>
<p>With a capacity factor of 10-30%, 17 GW of solar PV is equivalent to ~4 1-GW nuclear reactors, or ~2 two-reactor nuclear plants.</p>
<p>&#8220;Solar panels are made of Silicone which is just melted sand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Solar panels are made of silicon; the processing of which is a bit more involved.</p>
<p>&#8220;The amount of energy we receive from the sun in one day is:<br />
1.5 x 10 the 22 power Joules<br />
translates to:<br />
4.6 quadrillion kW/h<br />
which looks like this:<br />
4,166,666,667,000,000<br />
(4.16 quadrillion)<br />
At $.015 per kw/H that is worth:<br />
$625,000,000,000,000&#8243;</p>
<p>1.5 e22 J = 1.5 e22 J / 3600 s/h = 4.17 e15 kW-h of thermal energy.<br />
If that were electrical energy,<br />
4.17 e15 kW(e)-h * 0.15 $/kW-h = $625 e12.</p>
<p>But 89 PW * 3600 s/h * 24 h = 7.7 e21 J of heat = 2.14 e15 kW(th)-h<br />
~~&gt; 3.2 e14 kW(e)-h at 15% efficiency<br />
~~&gt; $48 e12 at 0.15 $/kW-h</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skelly Electric, Inc</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/#comment-106356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skelly Electric, Inc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31737#comment-106356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great infographic about the power of solar!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great infographic about the power of solar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/#comment-106337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31737#comment-106337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty graphic, needs a proof-reader. Fake boobs are made of silicone. Solar panels and sand are silicon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty graphic, needs a proof-reader. Fake boobs are made of silicone. Solar panels and sand are silicon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/26/the-power-of-solar-power-infographic/#comment-106319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31737#comment-106319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lot of errors in there. For instance,

&quot;17 gigawatts produces 224,400,000,000 kW/h [224.4 TW-h] of energy ...&quot;

17 GW = 17 GW * 8766 h/yr = 149 TW-h per year. 
I can&#039;t figure out how they got a bigger number. 224.4 / 17 = 13.2, but what&#039;s that?
For 17 GW of solar, multiply by the capacity factor. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lot of errors in there. For instance,</p>
<p>&#8220;17 gigawatts produces 224,400,000,000 kW/h [224.4 TW-h] of energy &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>17 GW = 17 GW * 8766 h/yr = 149 TW-h per year.<br />
I can&#8217;t figure out how they got a bigger number. 224.4 / 17 = 13.2, but what&#8217;s that?<br />
For 17 GW of solar, multiply by the capacity factor. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
