Comments on: $20 Trillion for Urgent Climate Change Action

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:20:00 +0000

Geoengineering solutions are concerning as hell. Which is one reason why prevention through cutting gg emissions is such a better option.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:20:00 +0000

Yep. Geoengineering solutions are concerning as hell. Which is one reason why prevention through cutting gg emissions is such a better option.

By: boambria

boambria — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:24:00 +0000

what about the geo-engineering?? every day HUGE grids of X’s in the sky as far as the eye can see.. the constant release of dangerous chemicals in the sky? also the ionospheric testing going on … constant pumping of high and low frequencies being pumped into the ionosphere causing jet stream manipulation and massive energy rebounds ???

By: boambria

boambria — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:16:00 +0000

so.. what about all the Geo-engineering, cloud seeding etc…? what about the ionospheric testing going on all over the world? all the chemicals being sprayed in the air from jets.. every day HUGE grids of giant X’s in the sky….the pumping of mass amounts of low and high frequencies into the ionosphere, causing jet stream manipulations and massive rebounds of energy??

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:33:00 +0000

Haha, appreciate it

Spent toooo much time on comments here and on Planetsave today

Keeps me from other important work, but guess it’s got to be done (think that’s part of the reason why the funded commenters and bots are working though — to take time away from other work).

on what we’re already seeing, yeah, love our secretary of Ag’s statement on this: “Hard to Explain” How Anyone Could Not Tell the Climate is Changing
Source: Planetsave (http://s.tt/13m7y)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:20:00 +0000

Good work Zach. Keep fighting the righteous fight on behalf of those who follow us.

Even for us, now that we’re starting to ‘enjoy’ the fruits of global climate change, all those 100 year floods year after year, the 500 year floods, the 1,000 year flood….

The NE US should get its snow shovels ready. Hudson Bay is not freezing back on schedule. Look for the possibility of a lot of lake effect snow coming your way in a few weeks. And northern Europe – doesn’t look good for you this year. You might want to pick up some extra long underwear.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:03:00 +0000

1st of all: this is blogging.
2nd: these are issues i’ve covered a thousand times in more depth. the news was the statement by these investors.
3rd: are you seriously going to use “girls” like that and then act as if you are fighting for justice and equality. that’s borderline hilarious & borderline insane.
4th: if your group is not including climate change as an issue, i hope to god you aren’t pretending to represent the 99% or even the majority. and that’s both sad is hell & masochistic.
5th: there’s no way you’re going to address the 6th mass extinction of the planet without address climate change.
6th: i was once critical of C&T, but, after looking into it much more, it is a completely sensible approach to the problem, imho. yes, i’d probably prefer a carbon tax, but not matter what the solution is the most important point is that a price be put on CO2, and the devil is in the details. in my opinion, given the current political situation, C&T is our best and a highly needed option.
7th: ignoring climate change (the problem) because you don’t like the most popular solution is like ignoring murderers because you don’t like the death penalty. guess what? ignoring the problem doesn’t help in the least. want a better solution to the problem than the solution on the table. push for it. but don’t let murders continue murdering people.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:30:00 +0000

m k, you sincerely think thousands of scientists all over the world and just about every major scientific body is wrong? you think they’ve all been bribed (rather than the 1-3% of climate scientists funded by the fossil-fuel industry who disagree)?

the science has been clear for decades. you think the scientists decades ago who warned us about this were also bribed?

have you ever if seen a climate scientist talking about these issues?

have you looked at the clear science showing how our planet is heating up?

if not, i recommend the following:

BEST Study (Climate Science Skeptic Study) Finds Global Warming is Real — Global Warming Deniers Are Pissed (What’s New?) ( http://planetsave.com/2011/10/22/best-study-climate-science-skeptic-study-finds-global-warming-is-real-whats-new/ )

http://planetsave.com/2011/10/06/global-warming-videos/

255 Leading Scientists, 11 Nobel Laureates Write Letter Supporting Climate Scientists & Climate Science ( http://planetsave.com/2010/05/07/255-leading-scientists-11-nobel-laureates-write-letter-supporting-climate-scientists-climate-science/ )

17 Nobel Laureates Call for “fundamental transformation and innovation in all spheres and at all scales in order to stop and reverse global environmental change” ( http://planetsave.com/2011/05/21/17-nobel-laureates-call-for-%E2%80%9Cfundamental-transformation-and-innovation-in-all-spheres-and-at-all-scales-in-order-to-stop-and-reverse-global-environmental-change%E2%80%9D/ )

there’s a reason why these organizations say global warming caused by humans is a FACT:

U.S. Agency for International Development
United States Department of Agriculture
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
National Institute of Standards and Technology
United States Department of Defense
United States Department of Energy
National Institutes of Health
United States Department of State
United States Department of Transportation
U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
National Center for Atmospheric Research
National Aeronautics & Space Administration
National Science Foundation
Smithsonian Institution
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Council
African Academy of Sciences
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias
Cameroon Academy of Sciences
Royal Society of Canada
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Académie des Sciences, France
Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina of Germany
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Accademia nazionale delle scienze of Italy
Indian National Science Academy
Science Council of Japan
Kenya National Academy of Sciences
Madagascar’s National Academy of Arts, Letters and Sciences
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias
Nigerian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society of New Zealand
Polish Academy of Sciences
Russian Academy of Sciences
l’Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Academy of Science of South Africa
Sudan Academy of Sciences
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Tanzania Academy of Sciences
Turkish Academy of Sciences
Uganda National Academy of Sciences
The Royal Society of the United Kingdom
National Academy of Sciences, United States
Zambia Academy of Sciences
Zimbabwe Academy of Science
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Astronomical Society
American Chemical Society
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Physics
American Medical Association
American Meteorological Society
American Physical Society
American Public Health Association
American Quaternary Association
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Society of Agronomy
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Plant Biologists
American Statistical Association
Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
Botanical Society of America
Crop Science Society of America
Ecological Society of America
Federation of American Scientists
Geological Society of America
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
Natural Science Collections Alliance
Organization of Biological Field Stations
Society of American Foresters
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Society of Systematic Biologists
Soil Science Society of America
Australian Coral Reef Society
Australian Medical Association
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Engineers Australia
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
Geological Society of Australia
British Antarctic Survey
Institute of Biology, UK
Royal Meteorological Society, UK
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
European Physical Society
European Science Foundation
International Association for Great Lakes Research
International Union for Quaternary Research
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Health Organization
World Meteorological Organization

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:25:00 +0000

global warming and climate change are different things. they’ve both been in the scientific literature for decades.

the only known to have focused heavily on getting everyone to use one term over the other was Republican pollster Frank Luntz, who actually promoted using “climate change” because it was less scary.

more history here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sdALFnlwV_o

& here: http://planetsave.com/2011/10/06/global-warming-videos/

dozens of Nobel Laureates and just about every overarching scientific body in the world, and even climate skeptics who have carefully analyzed the data, have determined that global warming is happening, concerning, and human-caused.

see: 255 Leading Scientists, 11 Nobel Laureates Write Letter Supporting Climate Scientists & Climate Science ( http://planetsave.com/2010/05/07/255-leading-scientists-11-nobel-laureates-write-letter-supporting-climate-scientists-climate-science/ )

see: 17 Nobel Laureates Call for “fundamental transformation and innovation in all spheres and at all scales in order to stop and reverse global environmental change” ( http://planetsave.com/2011/05/21/17-nobel-laureates-call-for-%E2%80%9Cfundamental-transformation-and-innovation-in-all-spheres-and-at-all-scales-in-order-to-stop-and-reverse-global-environmental-change%E2%80%9D/ )

see: BEST Study (Climate Science Skeptic Study) Finds Global Warming is Real — Global Warming Deniers Are Pissed (What’s New?) ( http://planetsave.com/2011/10/22/best-study-climate-science-skeptic-study-finds-global-warming-is-real-whats-new/ )

see: Global Warming Videos (Best, Funniest, Most Inspiring) ( http://planetsave.com/2011/10/06/global-warming-videos/ )

these organizations say global warming caused by humans is a FACT:

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:20:00 +0000

right, a fool and dozens of Nobel Laureates and just about every overarching scientific body in the world and even climate skeptics who have carefully analyzed the data.

see: Global Warming Videos (Best, Funniest, Most Inspiring) ( http://planetsave.com/2011/10/06/global-warming-videos/ )

of course, only a fool would believe the clear scientific proof…

note: these organizations say global warming caused by humans is a FACT:

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:00 +0000

Wow, i think you have DEFINITELY drunk the kool aid.

mini ice age? have you seen the temperatures graphs of the last 2 decades?

there is a kernel of truth there: we might have been cooling slightly if we weren’t burning up so many greenhouse gases that we’re cooking the planet.

even top climate SKEPTICS have now confirmed what thousands upon thousands of scientists have been warning us of for decades:

for past climate change, please check out these posts:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-change-little-ice-age-medieval-warm-period.htm

http://www.skepticalscience.com/heading-into-new-little-ice-age.htm

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:00 +0000

replies to more myths here: http://planetsave.com/2010/08/13/119-one-liners-to-respond-to-climate-science-myths/

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:02:00 +0000

it looks like some people with common sense and money don’t want to go headlong into a natural-disaster-ridden world

By: Shocker! Climate Change Action Much Cheaper than Inaction | Planetsave

Shocker! Climate Change Action Much Cheaper than Inaction | Planetsave — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:30:30 +0000

[…] I know is that without these rich-as-s*** people telling us the obvious we never would have figured it out. I mean, no scientist studying the […]

By: m k

m k — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:25:00 +0000

dude, you don’t mean carbon right? you mean carbon dioxide. ‘carbon burning technology’ ooh that sounds bad. carbon dioxide, which is what you twits want to get rid of, is a specious, disproved theory by many scientists and most recently the CERN experiments. it’s a bid lie, for big money, for big carbon.

By: JON

JON — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:36:00 +0000

285 top investors who represent $20 trillion. It looks like the 1% are at it again.

By: JON

JON — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:35:00 +0000

UFO’s and bigfoot are real and there is scientific evidence to prove this. We are actually in a mini ice age right now, it used to be a lot warmed 30,000 years ago

By: prohuman

prohuman — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:23:00 +0000

Film I just hope people gullible enough to believe in the easter bunny, UFOs, Bigfoot, Santa and Climate change well know less then you. Only a fool believes this latest fairy tale of man made Global warming.

By: Filmsoundone

Filmsoundone — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:44:00 +0000

Well I think you should hope that most people that read your post you know less then you. That would be the only way in which anything you have said would be taken seriously. The earth “has warmed” by 1 degree through humans using carbon burning technology.

By: Lloyd Vandenberg

Lloyd Vandenberg — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:13:00 +0000

Who are these companies or group of companies? What happened to global warming? Is it now global climate change because we can’t “prove” warming? Why are we spending billions on a carbon reduction strategy that has no measurable benefit? Why was Greenland inhabited and farmed by Erik the Red in 985 and is now to cold to farm? Why did we have climate change back then without all the “Carbon emmisions” we have now?