<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sungevity, Rabobank Team Up with $75 million Residential Solar Leasing Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/#comment-105604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31388#comment-105604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All good criticisms. And I agree with you.

The only reasons I support solar leasing is that some people just won&#039;t take the other route (sadly) -- i try to always mention they lose out in the long run by not just installing themselves. And, for some people, it may actually be the only legitimate option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good criticisms. And I agree with you.</p>
<p>The only reasons I support solar leasing is that some people just won&#8217;t take the other route (sadly) &#8212; i try to always mention they lose out in the long run by not just installing themselves. And, for some people, it may actually be the only legitimate option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/#comment-105600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31388#comment-105600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I was being facetious about the pennies, true the savings will be more than a few pennies.  Although I don&#039;t believe these leases are the wisest of decisions.  One is leasing away their mineral rights so to speak for many years.  New technology that promises cheaper solar cells, made with less polluting processes, using less energy to produce are here now, and being brought online.  &quot;Liquid Phase Processing, will eliminate the need for the expensive ovens for processing the AR coatings, black silcon will increase effficiency by another 15% or so, and tandem cells will almost double today&#039;s current efficiency rates. 

Today you can buy or lease PV&#039;s that will reduce your bill,. In a short time, you will be able to buy PV&#039;s that may eliminate your electric bill entirely, at a reduced cost to todays systems.

Why lease from a company who is essentially getting a loan from a bank, to buy and install your system?  Why not just obtain the loan yourself, and keep more of the savings for yourself?  Yes there are some valid reasons for leasing, they provide the maintenance, and can obtain loans that some homeowners otherwise could not.  Yes it is good to see the conversion to solar moving forward, but let&#039;s call it like it is, Sungevity and banks stand to earn handsome profits, while homeowners realize some meager savings.  

My beef is that Sungevity is not a publicly traded company. It continues the distribution process of wealth to those that already have plenty, while offering the homeowner a small savings.  People would be better servied to start co-ops, that fund these projects for a whole neighborhood. The energy from the sun falling on one&#039;s property is a valuable resource, one should not be so quick to squander it, for reduced electric bills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I was being facetious about the pennies, true the savings will be more than a few pennies.  Although I don&#8217;t believe these leases are the wisest of decisions.  One is leasing away their mineral rights so to speak for many years.  New technology that promises cheaper solar cells, made with less polluting processes, using less energy to produce are here now, and being brought online.  &#8220;Liquid Phase Processing, will eliminate the need for the expensive ovens for processing the AR coatings, black silcon will increase effficiency by another 15% or so, and tandem cells will almost double today&#8217;s current efficiency rates. </p>
<p>Today you can buy or lease PV&#8217;s that will reduce your bill,. In a short time, you will be able to buy PV&#8217;s that may eliminate your electric bill entirely, at a reduced cost to todays systems.</p>
<p>Why lease from a company who is essentially getting a loan from a bank, to buy and install your system?  Why not just obtain the loan yourself, and keep more of the savings for yourself?  Yes there are some valid reasons for leasing, they provide the maintenance, and can obtain loans that some homeowners otherwise could not.  Yes it is good to see the conversion to solar moving forward, but let&#8217;s call it like it is, Sungevity and banks stand to earn handsome profits, while homeowners realize some meager savings.  </p>
<p>My beef is that Sungevity is not a publicly traded company. It continues the distribution process of wealth to those that already have plenty, while offering the homeowner a small savings.  People would be better servied to start co-ops, that fund these projects for a whole neighborhood. The energy from the sun falling on one&#8217;s property is a valuable resource, one should not be so quick to squander it, for reduced electric bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/#comment-105593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31388#comment-105593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, individuals will save more than a few pennies. But, otherwise, Yep!.. But if people would rather lose money than put more money down up front, good for the companies making a profit on that while helping us transition to a clean energy economy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, individuals will save more than a few pennies. But, otherwise, Yep!.. But if people would rather lose money than put more money down up front, good for the companies making a profit on that while helping us transition to a clean energy economy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/#comment-105586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31388#comment-105586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sungevity is a privately held company.  Home owners will save a few pennies on their electric bills, while venture capitalists and banks will reap the lion&#039;s share of the profits.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sungevity is a privately held company.  Home owners will save a few pennies on their electric bills, while venture capitalists and banks will reap the lion&#8217;s share of the profits.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrymckay</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/14/sungevity-rabobank-team-up-with-75-million-residential-solar-leasing-fund/#comment-105529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henrymckay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31388#comment-105529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will you establish a branch in South Africa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will you establish a branch in South Africa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
