<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevy EN-V Concept Launched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/13/chevy-en-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/13/chevy-en-v/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/13/chevy-en-v/#comment-105523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31373#comment-105523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MIT City is a very interesting small car.  I&#039;m not sure the collapsing part is that useful, it already has a small footprint.  But the rest, I like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MIT City is a very interesting small car.  I&#8217;m not sure the collapsing part is that useful, it already has a small footprint.  But the rest, I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/13/chevy-en-v/#comment-105522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31373#comment-105522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see them as neighborhood driver-less taxis.  It seems that self-navigation is pretty well developed.  A fleet of these little guys could park themselves around town and redistribute themselves as needed.  They could charge while parked and pick you up with a phone call.

We may be a few years away from self-driving vehicles but they&#039;re coming and I suspect they&#039;ll be tried out first in slower speed units something like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see them as neighborhood driver-less taxis.  It seems that self-navigation is pretty well developed.  A fleet of these little guys could park themselves around town and redistribute themselves as needed.  They could charge while parked and pick you up with a phone call.</p>
<p>We may be a few years away from self-driving vehicles but they&#8217;re coming and I suspect they&#8217;ll be tried out first in slower speed units something like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Garven</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/13/chevy-en-v/#comment-105508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Garven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=31373#comment-105508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still like the MIT City Car better.  Go here to see a picture.

http://cities.media.mit.edu/projects/citycar.html

While it might not be quite as tricked out as the futuristic networked Chevy is, it seems to be a more serious attempt at creating a more functional and efficient transportation vehicle.  You could either own/rent/lease it which I believe would make it a potentially bigger seller.  I also question the readiness of people to buy a vehicle based on the balancing act of a two wheeled Segway.  I could accept the 3 wheeled Aptera but 4 wheels sounds better. 

What I would like to have is a two passenger electric vehicle with enough space for 4-6 bags of groceries or enough space for a few gallons of paint from the local hardware store.  Something more than a golf cart but something less than my 5 passenger vehicle.  Its range should be about 25-30 miles per charge.  That type of electric vehicle would meet about 95% of my driving needs.  I don&#039;t need the MIT City Car to fold up or have 4 wheel steering.  Where I live parking is no big deal.  In New York City or Downtown L.A. maybe - but then again that really limits it&#039;s sales potential/volume doesn&#039;t it. 

I just don&#039;t see this vehicle [a big Segway] as having much potential but it is a cool looking concept.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still like the MIT City Car better.  Go here to see a picture.</p>
<p><a href="http://cities.media.mit.edu/projects/citycar.html" rel="nofollow">http://cities.media.mit.edu/projects/citycar.html</a></p>
<p>While it might not be quite as tricked out as the futuristic networked Chevy is, it seems to be a more serious attempt at creating a more functional and efficient transportation vehicle.  You could either own/rent/lease it which I believe would make it a potentially bigger seller.  I also question the readiness of people to buy a vehicle based on the balancing act of a two wheeled Segway.  I could accept the 3 wheeled Aptera but 4 wheels sounds better. </p>
<p>What I would like to have is a two passenger electric vehicle with enough space for 4-6 bags of groceries or enough space for a few gallons of paint from the local hardware store.  Something more than a golf cart but something less than my 5 passenger vehicle.  Its range should be about 25-30 miles per charge.  That type of electric vehicle would meet about 95% of my driving needs.  I don&#8217;t need the MIT City Car to fold up or have 4 wheel steering.  Where I live parking is no big deal.  In New York City or Downtown L.A. maybe &#8211; but then again that really limits it&#8217;s sales potential/volume doesn&#8217;t it. </p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t see this vehicle [a big Segway] as having much potential but it is a cool looking concept.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
