Comments on: Fracking Infographic http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 By: Zachary Shahan http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-137580 Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:13:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-137580 yep, we’re biased against bad technology. thanks for noticing. :D

]]> By: Bob_Wallace http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-137223 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:15:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-137223 Just noticed something. In the “Who has the gas” graphic it states that the US has 862 trillion cubic feet of NG.

In 2010 we were burning at a 24tcf rate per year. At that rate or NG supply would last 36 years.

In 2012 we’re using 50% more NG for electricity than we were in 2010. As we close coal plants we’re going to use even more. We’re also starting to use more for transportation and we’re going to be exporting a bunch. We could easily cut that 36 year supply down to 18 years.

]]> By: FrackingIsntEvil http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-137219 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:29:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-137219 You need to read more. You are clearly misinformed and extremely biased.

]]> By: Hydraulic Fracturing Infographic – Save The Poconos – Stop Fracking With Our Water! http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-114461 Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:38:42 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-114461 […] CleanTechnica.com Posted in […]

]]> By: Anonymous http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-105042 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:37:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-105042 Used in over 800 gas and oil wells mostly in Canadian Northwest. This year they moved new equipment into Eagleford shale of Texas. They have done test wells in Marcellus shale. Husky Oil has been working with Gasfrac Energy Services Inc for sometime. A long term contract with them is validation that recovery of gas and oil liquids is superior to hydro-fracking in addition to the environmental advantages.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-105038 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:11:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-105038 hmm, haven’t heard of it.

so, it is not really used yet but you think it will be used widely?

]]> By: Anonymous http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/27/fracking-infographic/#comment-105037 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:06:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30924#comment-105037 You need to look at the alternative to hydro-fracking. LPG fracking by Gasfrac Energy Services Inc. has a much smaller environmental impact .No water is used so no water to decontaminate .No minerals ,salts radioactive isotopes brought to the surface because LPG does not react with shale . Virtual all LPG is recovered leaving no fracking fluids in ground. LPG is reused. Almost no venting or flaring. One fifth the truck traffic. They just signed long term contract with Husky Oil. This is transformative technology.
J.Otto

]]>