Comments on: Rand Paul Tries to Stop EPA’s Ozone Cap and Trade

By: Susan Kraemer

Susan Kraemer — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:50:00 +0000

And that the infrastructure is already built and paid for. Including the transcontinental railways (to bring the coal to the power stations across country) that we federally funded back in the 19th century when we believed in such investment.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:31:00 +0000

Good point–the land grants. Now all we have to do is sneak down to foxnews and reap the whirlwind!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:46:00 +0000

The picture says it. Coal is only cheap because whole mountains are being blown up. This is a crime.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:15:00 +0000

Absolutely none of this would be necesary if the EPA did not pick winners and losers at the direction of whoever the sitting President is. We, as citizens, should be able to sue these companies out of business for tresspassing on our property. The Constitution does not give the Federal Government the authority to take away my rights, nor does it allow for the Executive Branch to write legislation. I am sick and tired of the government overstepping their authority and taking away my rights. EPA bureaucrats are not subject to election so the only person that they have to answer to is the president. Since GE, a major player in the nuclear power industry worldwide, provided so much contribution to the current president’s campaign, I can just imagine who pushed this new un-Constitutional regulation through. This is un-American as we have no right to redress of grievences. We can’t vote these EPA bums out. Eliminate the EPA and get us back our rights that these crooks stole under the guise of protecting us, and we can solve all these problems ourselves.