<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOE Supports Project to Cut Silicon Solar PV Wafer Costs 50%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/09/doe-supports-project-to-cut-silicon-solar-pv-wafer-costs-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/09/doe-supports-project-to-cut-silicon-solar-pv-wafer-costs-50/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/09/doe-supports-project-to-cut-silicon-solar-pv-wafer-costs-50/#comment-104679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30336#comment-104679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent research says the US still has a net positive China trade balance in clean tech, due in part to silicon.  If this investment can help solidify this advantage as a net exporter (to the world), and grow US jobs in the process, its a win.  Nonetheless, don&#039;t know whether the DOE will survive Solyndra. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent research says the US still has a net positive China trade balance in clean tech, due in part to silicon.  If this investment can help solidify this advantage as a net exporter (to the world), and grow US jobs in the process, its a win.  Nonetheless, don&#8217;t know whether the DOE will survive Solyndra. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/09/doe-supports-project-to-cut-silicon-solar-pv-wafer-costs-50/#comment-104355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30336#comment-104355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a national scale, $150 million is tiny money.

Some Superbowl game ads cost $3 million for 30 seconds of air time.

We&#039;re spending the equivalence of buying 25 minutes of time on TV.  If it drives down the price of PV then it is money extremely well spent.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a national scale, $150 million is tiny money.</p>
<p>Some Superbowl game ads cost $3 million for 30 seconds of air time.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re spending the equivalence of buying 25 minutes of time on TV.  If it drives down the price of PV then it is money extremely well spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/09/doe-supports-project-to-cut-silicon-solar-pv-wafer-costs-50/#comment-104349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=30336#comment-104349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The naysayers are getting &quot;Chu-ed&quot;!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The naysayers are getting &#8220;Chu-ed&#8221;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
