<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renewable Energy Projects Under Pressure from Feds and Environmental Groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interior Opening Up 17 Solar Energy Zones in 6 Western States &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-106937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interior Opening Up 17 Solar Energy Zones in 6 Western States &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-106937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Energy Leaders Call on Obama Administration to Fast-Track Wind &amp; Solar Energy Projects- Renewable Energy Projects Under Pressure from Feds and Environmental Groups- Recovery Act Gets Another Half Gigawatt on the Grid in Nevada  /**/ Hello there! If you are new [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Energy Leaders Call on Obama Administration to Fast-Track Wind &amp; Solar Energy Projects- Renewable Energy Projects Under Pressure from Feds and Environmental Groups- Recovery Act Gets Another Half Gigawatt on the Grid in Nevada  /**/ Hello there! If you are new [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona solar potentially losing focus on commercial solar &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-103339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arizona solar potentially losing focus on commercial solar &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-103339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and commercial markets. However a focus on utility-scale projects, particularly where there is pressure on developers in acquiring enough land to make such a project feasible, could be problematic for solar in Arizona in general. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and commercial markets. However a focus on utility-scale projects, particularly where there is pressure on developers in acquiring enough land to make such a project feasible, could be problematic for solar in Arizona in general. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona solar potentially losing focus on commercial solar &#124; Solar-Arizona.org</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-103286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arizona solar potentially losing focus on commercial solar &#124; Solar-Arizona.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-103286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and commercial markets. However a focus on utility-scale projects, particularly where there is pressure on developers in acquiring enough land to make such a project feasible, could be problematic for solar in Arizona in general. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and commercial markets. However a focus on utility-scale projects, particularly where there is pressure on developers in acquiring enough land to make such a project feasible, could be problematic for solar in Arizona in general. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona solar potentially losing focus on commercial solar &#124; Clean Energy Experts</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-103285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arizona solar potentially losing focus on commercial solar &#124; Clean Energy Experts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-103285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and commercial markets. However a focus on utility-scale projects, particularly where there is pressure on developers in acquiring enough land to make such a project feasible, could be problematic for solar in Arizona in general. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and commercial markets. However a focus on utility-scale projects, particularly where there is pressure on developers in acquiring enough land to make such a project feasible, could be problematic for solar in Arizona in general. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert E. Itzkovich</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-103208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert E. Itzkovich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-103208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice!: ... . Keep ON the GOOD WORK _ in FULL POWER CAPACITY!: ... . MOST Satisfactional!: ... .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!: &#8230; . Keep ON the GOOD WORK _ in FULL POWER CAPACITY!: &#8230; . MOST Satisfactional!: &#8230; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Giezentanner</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-103072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Giezentanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-103072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m all about solar energy, and I think it&#039;s important to develop it quickly in as many places as possible. But that doesn&#039;t mean &quot;Everywhere, at any cost to the environment.&quot; If clean energy is an environmental as well as societal goal, then it&#039;s implementation shouldn&#039;t destroy the environment. That seems pretty intuitive. I&#039;m not talking about rich folks worrying about a new wind farm ruining their precious view of the sea - that&#039;s a selfish and stupid thing to do. But building a huge solar farm on top of a delicate and relatively pristine piece of desert habitat is another issue. These projects should be sited carefully so that we can get the environmental benefits of solar and wind without harming the environment where they are built.

People who care about sustainability should be wary of making the same argument that the oil and gas industry makes for increased drilling - that the government shouldn&#039;t impose environmental regulations in the west because it increases costs and we need the energy and jobs. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all about solar energy, and I think it&#8217;s important to develop it quickly in as many places as possible. But that doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;Everywhere, at any cost to the environment.&#8221; If clean energy is an environmental as well as societal goal, then it&#8217;s implementation shouldn&#8217;t destroy the environment. That seems pretty intuitive. I&#8217;m not talking about rich folks worrying about a new wind farm ruining their precious view of the sea &#8211; that&#8217;s a selfish and stupid thing to do. But building a huge solar farm on top of a delicate and relatively pristine piece of desert habitat is another issue. These projects should be sited carefully so that we can get the environmental benefits of solar and wind without harming the environment where they are built.</p>
<p>People who care about sustainability should be wary of making the same argument that the oil and gas industry makes for increased drilling &#8211; that the government shouldn&#8217;t impose environmental regulations in the west because it increases costs and we need the energy and jobs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Dowdy, AICP</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/12/renewable-energy-projects-under-pressure-from-feds-and-environmental-groups/#comment-103061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Dowdy, AICP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=29598#comment-103061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a conservationist in Arizona I find the author of this article particularly ill-informed.  The facts fly in the face of this article so consider them since the author failed to do research:
1. Enviromission is not proposed on BLM lands, rather on Arizona State Trust lands.
2. Lands under consideration as &quot;wild lands&quot; under the Obama policy were largely pristine lands in remote and sensitive areas, the vast majority of which were not suitable for alternative energy development
3. The conservation and environmental community largely embraces solar development and are informing and guiding the BLM toward suitable lands.
4. Renewable energy is a balancing act, the benefit must outweigh the harm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a conservationist in Arizona I find the author of this article particularly ill-informed.  The facts fly in the face of this article so consider them since the author failed to do research:<br />
1. Enviromission is not proposed on BLM lands, rather on Arizona State Trust lands.<br />
2. Lands under consideration as &#8220;wild lands&#8221; under the Obama policy were largely pristine lands in remote and sensitive areas, the vast majority of which were not suitable for alternative energy development<br />
3. The conservation and environmental community largely embraces solar development and are informing and guiding the BLM toward suitable lands.<br />
4. Renewable energy is a balancing act, the benefit must outweigh the harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
